Neovim or Vim?

neomale -> neovim
male -> vim
female (male) -> vim with a pink theme

>>61219210
Both.

>>61219210
neovim. because it doesn't have a message about feeding little niggers in Africa every time you start it.

Microshaft Sword.

>>61219210
neomake is better than syntastic and deoplete is better than every other completion extension available on vim.

So yes

>>61219210
Emacs

Gvim on Windows cos Neovim still has a couple holes in.

Neovim elsewhere because Bram is a twat.

File: 1490599050622.png (183KB, 370x359px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 370x359px

>>61219235
>>61219484
>>61219296

File: HoeTrumpGetsHisIdeas.webm (1MB, 640x352px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x352px

>>61219296
>starting vim without a file(name)

Why use neovim when vim exists

>>61219296

 set shortmess+=Iat 

File: 1480527017878.png (65KB, 408x458px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 408x458px

Emacs

>>61219210
I know a trick how to make vim even better

$~ sudo apt-get remove vim
$~ sudo apt-get install emacs


Its the ultimate vim upgrade

File: something_happened.jpg (78KB, 447x456px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 447x456px

>>61219210
neovim because it doesn't crash when you autocomplete

>>61219235
This is very true.

>>61219235
>Vim is for obese greybeards
Makes sense

The one that doesn't block the UI by design.

>>61225420
>UI
kek

>>61219296
this

File: Screenshot from 2017-07-05 13-02-46.png (54KB, 814x619px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 814x619px

>>61219296
>>61227999

>>61221856
I know a trick how to make emacs even better
$~ sudo pacman -R emacs
$~ sudo pacman -S vim

File: Screenshot from 2017-07-05 14-38-22.png (12KB, 834x551px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 834x551px

>>61228172

>>61219210
neovim has noticeably better performance with muh plugins and redrawing the screen.

I actually compile from git because Debian is still distributing .17 (though I saw .20 coming through on experimental)

>>61222259
Neither does vim, you must have fucked up your .vimrc or some plugins

i am using atom, it's truly great.

File: file.png (36KB, 666x479px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 666x479px

>help poor children in Uganda

time to

pacman -R vim && pacman -S neovim

>>61221856
This.

>>61219210
from the thumbnail in catalog I though it was a picture of buddhists

>>61219210
vi

File: hands-arthritic.jpg (11KB, 350x231px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 350x231px

>>61221856
Hands of the average heavy emacs user.

File: no_thanks.jpg (396KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

396KB, 1280x960px

>>61230794
emacs. not even once.

>>61230794
The only serious emacs users I've ever met have RSI. I haven't met that many Vim users but none of them have issues like that. I think there's a distinct personality difference which causes this. Emacs users just want their editor to do everything, even if they have to do extreme hand contortions to perform a few extra macros. Vim users take a pragmatic and comfort driven approach, we try to make things as easy as possible, less keystrokes and less complex shortcuts etc. We optimise and pride ourselves in efficiency and minimal effort. For example, see Vim Golf.