>make thread about advanced programming or embedded hardware

your thread isn't precluded from being shit because of its topic

>>61187139
Of course not. But what else am I to do? Post on /qa/? Lol.

>>61187167
don't make shit threads and maybe people will reply next time

>This is why I go to Reddit.
>Lol.
>meta thread

yeah wow that's really weird how no one replies to your threads op

>expect intelligent and meaningful threads on 4chan.org
This website is litterally filled with autism. This is the same for all boards:
/vr/: if you want to get replies just post some meme about how avgn is shit or how *insert popular game* is such shit. /mu/: only way to get (you)s is to make a thread about /mu/ memes. 4chan is about memes and autism, nothing more

File: when-she-tells-you-she-uses-facebook.jpg (91KB, 637x613px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 637x613px

This board is filled mostly with under 21 /v/irgins who unironically watch LTT so yes, your thread will die unless it's gayman, consumerist or meme related. Next time use a bait image of a scantily clad women (or Nintendo kiddie dinosaur it that's your thing) and hopefully it will reel in those interested in the subject.

>>61188129
>>expect intelligent and meaningful threads on 4chan.org
There used to be tons of them. Fuck, when I found /k/ it was honestly better than basically every broad topic gun forum at the time (forums devoted to more specific topics did still beat it for discussion of those topics of course).