Waterfox

>not avaliable on gnu/linux
why havent you gone back to >>>/v/ yet?

placebo autism tier

>>61184360
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/waterfox-git/
Are you blind or simply retarded?

>>61184360
Go back to using your shitty obongo you dumb nigger

>64-bit optimized
What does this mean?

>faster than Firefox
[CITATION NEEDED]

>no SJW bullshit
Most of the actual code contribution are from white men, SJWs usually don't know anything about programming.

>Visit waterfoxproject.org
>"Download for Mac" button in the middle of the screen
What did they mean by this?

>>61184339
convince me to use it instead of edge.

It's still just as slow as Firefox on my machine.

>>61184641
If you're not using Mac it means you either don't have JavaScript enabled or you're spoofing the user agent.

>>61184339
i uyse waterfox. its just 64 bit fox though. i wish they added back support for homepage to not show file://hhhhhhh when its set to something new

File: palemoon_66357.png (66KB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 200x200px

Because I'm using the superior browser

>>61184657
It isn't named after orgasm control technique.

>>61184751
instead it's name sounds like some watersports sex fetish enthusiast chatroom nickname.

>>61184339
>made by a shady company

no thanks

>>61184825
How about Iceweasel?

>>61184868
what's the benefit performancewise? edge is fast, light, has ublock origin and goes easy on my laptops battery.

>>61184853
Lul if that is your reason why are you using Firefox/chrome then?

>>61184908
No, I meant come up with something sexual about the name Iceweasel.

>>61184339
>32-bit Firefox outperformed 64-bit Waterfox in Peacekeeper browser benchmark tests run by TechRepublic in 2012
>in 2016 64-bit Waterfox performed worse than 64-bit Mozilla Firefox in the Kraken, SunSpider, JetStream, and Octane 2.0 benchmarks. Benchmarks were once available on the developers website but have since been removed.

you're using a browser made by a cuck who coded it when he was 16
you deserve to be perma banned for this, kys

>>61184339
>Unironically using placebo browser with actual shit performance.
Mate...

>>61184339
Because I can compile PGO firefox and disable compile time bloat on Gentoo 300x easier

>>61184339
>sudo apt install waterfox
>package not found

>>>/thrash/

>>61184622
>the world is divided into white men and sjws
>white men can't be sjws
>all non-white and/or non-men are sjws

File: for linux.png (82KB, 789x386px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 789x386px

>>61184360

File: Screenshot at 2017-07-02 13-15-47.png (66KB, 1272x581px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1272x581px

>>61184339
what a fucking turd

the deb doesn't install anything, no gpg key, and the ssh doesn't woek on the master tar.bz2

Isn't this shit useless? There's already a 64bit firefox now, I remember a few years ago that Waterfox actually benchmarked lower than than 32bit firefox

File: unnamed.png (104KB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 300x300px

this is still around
https://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron_download.php
looks slightly better than cromium

>>61185456
Does Richard Gere endorse it?

>>61184641
are you using uMatrix?

what is it going to do about webextensions?

>>61184339
Because any browser that needs to advertise
>no SJW bullshit
probably isn't actually all that great.

>>61185456
probably a necrophile swede then?

>>61187083
>>>/till death/