I HURT MYSELF TODAY
>>61148463
These threads are stupid. CPU-Z is shit.
>>61148463
>1.78
>>61148485
>yfw
>>61148487
>worrying about winbloat app versions instead of worrying about being on winbloat itself
>>61148463
>using outdated cpu-z
Amd shills full damage control
>>61148521
>Outdated
Yeah, he doesn't have the update that removed the cache tests straight up because Intel was getting blasted in them
>>61148463
because you get off on pain?
Everyone knows that more cores are good for productivity.
But it doesn't change the fact that the -majority- of games are built for 4 cores, and a Kaby/Skylake CPU has a stronger 4 core architecture.
Take your shilling elsewhere.
>>61148463
What's the score on cpuz v. 1.79.1 current?
I ran CPU-Z with my 1600X in a VM with only 8 out of 12 threads enabled to simulate a 1500X at 4GHz. Beat the 6700k which was also at 4GHz in multithreading but lost in single thread, weird.
>>61148557
No, the cashe tests were straight up incorrect.
>>61149738
Huh, looks a lot more reasonable on real Windows. I knew Ryzen had performance issues in VMs, interesting to see it quantified. Something's thrashing my single thread performance. Oh well, this just proves Ryzen is barely behind Skylake clock for clock.
Feel free to deler urself.
>>61149935
something more recent.
>>61149961
My God man, I don't have a screenshot, but my 12 core I posted earlier gets in the low 6000s on very 1.79.
You need to step up your game bro
>>61150019
This is already way too overkill for me. I am just fine on my i5-4210U laptop that scores much less.
>>61150019
What cpu do you have?
>>61150073
Dual x5680s at 4.5ghz or so.
>>61150069
Yeah ik, I mainly use mine to shitpost about on /g/ from my phone.
>>61150097
My 2696v3 is 18 cores @ 2.8GHz, so obviously 12 cores at 4.5 comes close. But probably consumed 2-3x electricity.