Which is better?

960 pro

>>61144302
bigger one

PRO has better durability than EVO, but the NVMe one is faster.
Whachoo want

Too much for a 1tb ssd.
A see Deals for 250 all the time.

With this in mind, the ssd

File: 000001.jpg (141KB, 2069x1552px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 2069x1552px

>>61144335

File: 000002.jpg (191KB, 720x540px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 720x540px

>>61144336
>>61144374
>>61144380
ok. 850 pro 512gb it is

>>61144424
What does the 512gb cost?

>>61144302
Just look at the transfer speeds senpai.
Assuming you have an m.2 slot the 960 shits on the 850.

The one that best suits your needs you retarded fuck.

>>61144302
The NVME of course , anyone telling you other wise is falling for a meme or too poor to have an M2 Mobo

>>61144482
$310 CDN

Since this thread is shit and basically over, I'll use it to ask a question of my own.
Recently I got a really good deal on an Elitebook, but it came with a m2 sata ssd. I'm thinking about switching to a nvme one and using the old ssd as a usb drive.
The system is already really fast and I'm not sure if I need the plus in speed right now, but if I don't do it now, I'll never do it.
Did anyone on here swap a sata ssd for a nvme one? Was the difference in speed actually noticeable, or just in very special cases?
Would you recommend the upgrade?
I'm thinking about getting the 960 pro if that's important

>>61144607
tldr

>>61144617
>Did anyone on here swap a sata ssd for a nvme one? Was the difference in speed actually noticeable, or just in very special cases?

>Would you recommend the upgrade?

>>61144546
The nvme is a heat throttle.
Blocks the airflow.

>>61144590
Look around for a cheaper price.
Even in germany I get a terabyte one for 250 any other week.

>>61144302

This thread, just looking at performance and model and nothing further.

Oh price. Why is this so retarded, this is genius pricing by samsung to sell the 960 evos

I have the 850, no PCIe space for the 960.

Go with the 960 if you can.

Likely you won't notice the difference. Bottleneck stops being the storage soon enough.

>>61144607
do you even have a m.2 slot

>>61144302
evo
only real advantage of pro is hardware encryption, which you cant trust anyway

>>61144664
because
>muh enterprise

>>61144705
yes, the laptop has an m2 slot and there are versions with nvme ssd and some with sata m2 ssds coming with that OPUS encryption shit I don't need.
So it's able to make use of nvme ssds in theory.

>>61144374
>PRO has better durability than EVO
>MTBF: 2 Mhours (228 years) vs 1.5 Mhours (171 years)
>Endurance: 6046.9TB vs 400TB

You'll upgrade to something else long before that matters...

>>61144762
>>61145192

the nvme is just an experimental phase, the heat generated has only been mitigated very recently

the 850 pro has a warranty of 10 years. try torrenting on evo vs pro, the pro will hold

the pros are used sometimes raided on arrays for 4k video recording on the fly

the intel 750 is a better scratch disk than the nvme

the ssd form is much more reliable than the nvme

the boot time is much longer on a nvme (varies, unsourced)

the ssd format is the better option but just get both if you can (pros on both), this is just R&D for Samsung because the EVO marked down this early is a marker while the 850 pro is a standard still in demand

>>61144302
EVO has enough TBW for normal use
Unless you are a professional video editor
You'll never reach a Samsung PROs TBW in a single lifetime

File: Toshiba-Roadmap-QLC.jpg (595KB, 2000x1312px) Image search: [Google]

595KB, 2000x1312px

Affordable SSDs fucking when? I hate smartphones so much, fuck.

>>61145284
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about, so just stop. They're both SSDs, idiot.

>>61145339
Give it a year or 2

>>61145379

all SSDs are created equal, endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights

>>61145379
Stop knit picking and focus. SSD / m.2 is an obvious distinction.

>>61144302
The NVMe will beat the SATA drive any day, especially in heavy applications.
PCIe adaptor cards for B-Key NGFF drives are very cheap.

>>61146068

It's really not. SATA and m.2 is an obvious distinction. They're both SSDs.

You would be saying that USB Type-C and Thunderbolt 3 are an obvious distinction. They're both using the USB Type-C connector, but TB3 has specific requirements. Similarly, m.2 refers to a specific subset of SSDs that use the m.2 connector, and not all m.2 drives are nvme

How can I know if my motherboard supports full speed nvme?

https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/GA-H110-D3-rev-10#sp

m.2 is there, but I'm not of pci speed.

>>61144634
Barely nigga, if they have that kinda of money im sure cooling is no issue

File: Screenshot_2017-06-29-19-32-05.png (367KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

367KB, 1080x1920px

Pretty much

>>61144302
The M.2 Evos are known for dying quickly

>>61146779
Only if you don't add a heat sink

>>61144302
>not RAID5 nvme on two pci e x8 slots with m.2 nvme backing them up
>not having your sata ports full of HDDs full of porn and anime
what's wrong with you people? is it not 2017

>>61146779
Do they now? I know those small m.2 SSDs can get pretty hot, but die outright? I'm still using an 840 EVO from 2013, looking to get a bigger SSD whenever flash drops again.

File: Lg-Sata-Dvd-Writer-SDL675540710-2-4ee36.jpg (124KB, 850x995px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 850x995px

>>61146548
Since it's a SATA vs M.2
Which is better, pic or M.2

Now shut the fuck up and stop fucking nitpicking shit nobody but you cares about.

File: 20-167-358-05.jpg (29KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 640x480px

>>61147765
I hope you are cooling them.

>>61145339
Is there even any reason to use traditional HDDs anymore?

>>61150661
If you store your HDDs offline and don't want to lose data because the bits for tired

>>61147497
>putting HDDs in your PC instead of a separate NAS

As long as you've got at least a gigabit home network, you can do so much more.

>>61150661
price

>>61144302
I'm not entirely certain but isn't 960 EVO, TLC, while 850 Pro, MLC? Go with MLC if it's endurance and reliability you're looking for.

>>61150661
Price and the supposed data loss if using them for cold storage. I'd love to have a 8TB+ drive instead of all of these HDDs on the desktop, but it's not the time for that.

>>61150730
>not running your pc as your nas