>>61143376
yes, a little bit
yeah
It actually weighs less
depends on the data, 0's weigh more than 1's
>>61143436
>>61143403
who is correct?
>>61143483
prove it
>>61143478
the anon that watches anime
>>61143483
This
>>61143478
You could measure it and then hate yourself for asking such a question
>>61143491
it's simple when you transfer data on to a flash drive it heats up. The plastic shield around it loses particles the longer it is heated. Everyone knows plastic outweighs 1s and 0s
yes
t. computer PRO
Take a mechanical switch.
Flick it to Off.
Weigh it.
Flick it to On.
Weigh it.
Any difference?
On paper you can argue that there is a difference in weight, in reality we have nothing in existence that could measure the supposed difference.
>>61143376
Depends on the storage method used. But generally 1s carry more weight than 0s due to the extra electrons. This question is more relevant to batteries.
>>6114337
The same. What happens in and on the drive stays there. It can't be removed from the inside. Part of it will always be there, though, in a different place.
Information is transferred there and back but i dont think you can weigh [electronic] information.
If it's more, i have no idea how or why.
If its less, not sure why this would be.
>>61143525
Agreed.
>>61143518
It can vibrate, but i dont think particles can just remove themselves from a solid without a certain amount of force.
>>61143376
1's use less pixels than 0's. So it's bound to weigh less.
Does a bowl with water on one left side, separated by a vertical wall, weigh more than the same bowl with the water spread out?
The concept of energy is actually no easy to understand.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy
Actually you're all wrong.
When electricity is transferred to the device, the internal recursion lines vibrate, causing the drive to rapidly increase and decrease in mass. This renders the device weightless.
>>61143525
Don't say that, someone will weight it with a $200 device and claim that it has changed because they don't understand error margins.
>>61143871
no because the wall itself adds weight
>>61143871
Yes because there's a wall in the bowl