Ryzen pro

Intel does the same shit with vPro processors.

S so I bought 1700 too s soon..?

>>61138811
Those are only interesting to businesses.
I doubt consumers could utilize any of those extra features, aside of maybe the memory encryption.

File: 1495496672387.gif (971KB, 237x142px) Image search: [Google]

971KB, 237x142px

>>61138811
New Features;
>included Secure Boot, Content Protection, per-Application security, fTPM 2.0, and support for Microsoft Device Guard, Windows Hello, fingerprint security, data protection and so on. also adds Transparent Secure Memory Encryption (TSME) on top of them.

Also,
>Better silicon used, longer warranty.

>>61138811
I don't really needs those things. Higher quality silicon is nice and all, but it shouldn't be that much of a difference. The warranty is nice I guess.

File: ryzen_pro_-_june_19_press_deck_-_final_17_575px.jpg (44KB, 678x381px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 678x381px

also r3 specs leaked

>>61138811
Yeah, but is it .. pr0 GAYMUR?! I didn't think so. AMD BTFO as usual, can't get 20,000 FPS in CS:GO so it's useless.

Even with all the security, the question "is AMD CPUs a botnet" remains.
Unless they'll open ryzens

>>61138811
amateur cpu plebs, can't stand them, mine is a professional

File: 1483587203666.png (17KB, 328x215px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 328x215px

>>61138880
>No prices

File: trashman7.gif (2MB, 580x433px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 580x433px

>>61138867
>new features: botnet

>>61138904
That's what enterprise customers want.

File: 1425442254075.gif (724KB, 446x250px) Image search: [Google]

724KB, 446x250px

>>61138886
>Doesn't have pro gaymin equipment
>thinks he's gonna make it at CS:GO

I bet you don't even eat gamer food, fuck off back to cow-a-doody, pleb

File: 1498748638554.png (654KB, 1200x674px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 1200x674px

>>61138880
Tried to clean it up a bit but maybe just made it worse.

File: ryzen_pro_-_june_19_press_deck_-_final_17.jpg (199KB, 1918x1080px) Image search: [Google]

199KB, 1918x1080px

>>61138960

>>61138811
This is so they can put it in business class laptops and slice into that Intel dominated market.

>>61138867
Wait so normal Ryzen doesn't support Hello?

how do prices compare to pleb ryzen? is this the new stepping?

This all sounds entirely unnecessary.

File: 1492296708549.jpg (84KB, 616x539px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 616x539px

what a surprise, AMD forced to refresh the Ryzen lineup already because of lukewarm sales

>>61139424
Can't tell if trolling or just retarded.

Stop using Kumiko to shitpost.

>>61139462
Kyoanus shit is made for shitposting.

>>61138811
>Better sand

Unless that means lower voltages and higher clocks I don't know what better silicone means .

>>61139475
Exactly this. Mods bans for saying "kyoanus" on /a/ though so careful.

sooo better batch of wafers + botnet

>>61139614
>Everything I don't like is botnet

AMD needs this to break into business class computing.

>>61139631
They did it with EPYC.

File: 1498438925043.png (148KB, 222x293px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 222x293px

>>61139424
at least their processors dont come pre-shipped lukeworm like Firelake-X

>>61138867
Whole memory encryption is big, and makes me hopeful they actually did the PSP properly and didn't give it whole arbitrary memory access ala ME.

>>61139656
No. EPYC is for servers
Ryzen Pro is for desktop

>>61139540
>Mods bans for saying "kyoanus" on /a/
yet nurutu is allowed
where did /a/ go so wrong

>>61139868
And both are aimed at enterprise customers.

>>61139889
It's still not the irredeemable shit that is /g/, so it's still fine. Inciting side mentality or tribalism with studios is pure cancer, it's even worse that the retarded Nurutufags.

>>61139034
I am confused How can R7 1700 have same TDP as R3 1200 while having moar corez and more thread

>>61139907
You don't seem to understand. One is high-end hardware for high-end applications, the other is for office machines.

>>61139994
lower clock speeds but the listed tdp is mostly imaginary anyway

>>61138859
Typical AMD whitewashing. When Intel does the very same thing its bad (which is true).

When AMD feels it has the changes to start doing what Intel has done since the early nineties, it will: no longer same features for the whole range of cpu's.

Thanks, but no thanks: I'll stick with SB and Piledriver. Wake me with the next 40% increase in single threaded performance (from Sandy Bridge). And no: I will never buy cpu with non-soldered IHS. K6 is the only mistake I've done on this issue, but luckily heatsinks sit nicely directly to the die.

>>61139994
They probably didn't care during binning. Since there's so little cores, they didn't need to concern themselves with voltage leak and over-all power efficiency.

>>61140134
>no longer same features for the whole range of cpu's
were you expecting validated ECC functionality on desktop Ryzen chips?

>>61140173
I didn't expect anything, but that is the fact for bdver1 and bdver2 'desktop' chips.

And AMD on purpose made very promising statements about 'ECC support' before release and of course that was excepted because of previously having validated ECC on 'desktop' chips.

>>61139994
Because you're dumb and don't know what TPD means.

AMD could put TDP of 250W for the 1200, the product would be the same, power consumption and all.
It can also put the TDP of the product at 20W, it would be the same only it would thermally throttle in OEM environments.

TDP just tells them what kind of average cooling is required, if AMD says you need a 200W cooler on a 90W product, its TDP is 200W.

Understand now?

>>61140238
>validated
They weren't validated. They just weren't disabled.

>>61140263
Yes they were (not on every mobo though).

File: 1496454190140.jpg (41KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 500x500px

>>61138811

>Transparent Secure Memory Encryption (TSME)
>SME
>SEV
>DASH management protocol


BOTNET
O
T
N
E
T

Neat. So basically Threadrippers with out the cost and the cores

>>61138867
Garbage

>>61138904
>new features: more botnet

File: Tin_foil_hat.png (131KB, 249x238px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 249x238px

>>61138904
>>61140808
>>61142122
>>61142151
Nobody is forcing you to use the business class CPU, you paranoid goons.

File: 1490922440830.jpg (25KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 640x480px

>>61138811
Oh look. One Jew to another.

>>61142996
>pajeet
Yep everything has a botnet in it, now back to /pol/ with you.

>>61138811
Call me when the have an r5 1600x pro

>>61143041
t.inbred racist cis white goy

>>61142832
>It's good botnet because AMD does it
fuck off pajeet

>>61143092

This!

>>61143275
hey newfag, protip: do not use exclamation marks. It outs you as a newfag not just on 4chains, but on the entire internet.

File: gib.png (58KB, 778x512px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 778x512px

>>61138811
do want

>>61143322

>ooo newfag do not use exclamations marks
>you are newfag on the entire internet

Retard, gentlemans.

>>61143445
seriously just listen. You use CAPS, not exclamation marks. Even the reddit diaspora of 2010-2011 knew of this.

>>61143467
who cares man

>>61139347
Thinkpads and Macbooks powered by Ryzen when?

>>61139868
Then what is Ryzen for?
Betatesters?

>>61144303
Yes, welcome to consumer hardware.

>>61144353
I have never been happier in my life for waiting on a product.

I see nothing here to make me regret my 1800x. Not to mention
>no prices released

File: 1470363737406.jpg (50KB, 751x418px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 751x418px

>>61143829

>>61144469
Just waiting for zen3 and navi

File: 1498129116327.jpg (69KB, 495x625px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 495x625px

>>61138811
>AMD used the consumers as a validation team

>>61143829
you have to go back newfag

>commercial grade QUALITY
>commercial grade

What kind of fucking joke is this?

>boot shit

does that mean the user has control of the "Platform Security Processor"?
because that's the only thing they had to fucking do

>>61146971
Worked out pretty good. Especially with as quickly as they tackled some of the problems that came up.

>>61147790
RAM encryption takes care of that.

File: 1491746684899.png (81KB, 556x430px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 556x430px

>>61147842
it still requires that boot shit to boot up

they fucked it up
should've released Ryzen without that shitty boot guard and "management" processor for regular users THEN release Ryzen Pro for business / enterprises with that shitty boot guard and "management" processor

>>61138850
unless you need memory encryption, probably not.