Who here /good processor but shitty graphics card/? I am using

>>61133016
I5-4460/750Ti here

>>61133016
>good processor
>1600
>will literally bottleneck the 1050

>>61133064

shut the fuck up before I start posting cinebench scores.

Phenom II X6 1090t/RX480 8GB

I have the opposite situation, huge bottleneck but still holds up pretty well

>>61133016
i7-3770k/AMD 6950

>>61133016
was doing a FX 8320 and an RX 480.
now doing a R5 1600 and a GTX 1070
should have gone with the 1700 2bh, oh well it will hold until 2nd or 3rd gen. ryzen

R5 1600 with a Rx 550 here
I just needed a gpu, not gaming on this system (I have another one for that)

>>61133016
R7 1700 with an rx 570. Not that much of a bottleneck but it is sort of unbalanced at this point. Oh well, still works for work, I don't game that much

What would be the best CPU for maybe a 1080?

I7 3770k @4.6GHz
GTS 450

Kms

>>61133016
Where to get 1050 for $60

>>61133544
Anything that no sucks should be fine. Bottleneck is overmemed

i5 6600k & Integrated.

I7 4790K with a 7850 1gb
JUST

>>61133016
>good processor
>ryzen

good meme

>>61133016
6700k and a R9 380

can't find a good GPU for the price I want
its uniroically 900 bucks for a 1070 wtf that is just onehunderd off a 1080 in my country mad men miners are.

still mad at miners btw.

i have "ok" processor and good graphics card
lots of shit can be done with cuda and i got in before the mining craze so i figured as long as the cpu doesn't bottleneck it's better to prioritize the gpu

I have a 920 i7 & 980Ti

>>61134687
>Not even the 2GB
FeelsBadMan

File: C__Data_Users_DefApps_AppData_INTERNETEXPLORER_Temp_Saved Images_19105838_1921084568166972_2501636468947415450_n.jpg (20KB, 608x443px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 608x443px

I7 7700k
HD4850

Negligible gains.