Whoops wrong drivers he said
>>61128251
That would be pretty sweet actually.
>WANT TO BELIEVE
>still slower than Ti
>firestrike score
Okay, now do an actual bench test
>>61128251
Vega FE performs worse than 980 in SLI, 980 SLI performs worse than a single 1080ti Vega has High Walletwidth memory and is going to cost more than either.
>>61128336
>This was the FE
>RX Vega is optimised for games
>Raja isn't releasing RX Vega until drivers are fully ready
Its promising. Doesn't mean it absolutely definitely will beat the Ti, but it promises something.
>>61128438
>SLI
Yeah, enjoy wanking over benchmark performance and then enjoy your garbage or no scaling in real games.
why do you retards think I has to beat the 1080ti?
I would be glad if they could face a 1080, giving us an alternative to Nvidia.
>>61128356
keep in mind firestrike is DX11 and amd cards run like ass on DX11
>>61128455
I guess we'll have to...
(Just wait)*tm* and see.
Wait is this pthoshoppery or?
>>61128477
Because it was touted as a "titan killer" and cant even beat last years performance from last years cards.
Now all of a sudden its tuened into a "workstation card" not even for gaming lmao
>>61128251
What am I looking at here?
>>61128527
>titan killer
Post five examples from the archive of people calling it this on /g/.
>>61128527
ofcourse amd is gonna say that to build up hype. stop believing marketing, be realistic.
amd has to play the catch up game before they can beat nvidia or intel.
>>61128560
You can find over 5 instances where I have said the performance, at amd's absolute worst, its 1080 at polaris its halfway between 1080 and 1080ti closer to the the ti side, and from there sky's the limit on if they really did focus exclusively on bottleneck alleviation.
>>61128477
>poor volta official ad
>can't beat last year's pascal
Shit's hilarious
>>61128612
Nobody cares, retard. Go step on a rake.
>sandbagging or
>feign weakness where you are strong; appear to be strong where you are weak
Literally, LITERALLY, the art of war
>>61129651
Yeah ok