>Eizo claims that its new monitor is the first LCD panel to achieve a contrast ratio of 1.000.000:1, which is dramatically higher than any previous LCD panel, including the IPS LCD panels that Eizo has used in the past. These panels typically achieve only around 1000:1. If true, the improved contrast ratio of the LCD panel is close to matching OLED.
>The CG3145 is using neither OLED technology nor LCD local dimming. The company did not elaborate on how it has achieved the extreme contrast but it is highly likely that Eizo is in fact using Panasonic’s new IPS LCD technology with ”light-modulating cells”.
>The Japanese company adds that the monitor is capable of outputting 1000 nits peak brightness. It can also reproduce 98% of the DCI-P3 color space. The panel operates in 10-bit colors per channel and has a 24-bit LUT (look up table).
http://www.flatpanelshd.com/news.php?subaction=showfull&id=1494331977
hot
>>61118714
It's probably going to cost more than OLED so is useless.
>>61118737
I actually doubt that, if this ever hits scale it could smash every one of OLEDs weak spots
>cheap to produce
>no color drift (set and forget)
>no auto brightness limiter (stable white point)
and for gaming retards who cling onto outdated tube trash if you combined dual panel switching with black frame insertion would leave crt tubes in the dust literally
IPS panels dont have that high contrast to begin wit
>something is better
no shit
>>61118901
Nothing like this ever happens though, the industry forces you to buy one piece of hardware for every conceivable task and you better get use to it.
>9th May 2017
>>61118961
IPS panels that don't suck is news to me
>>61118714
>Dynamic contrast meme
lmao hdr nerds btfo
btfo idiots lol
b
t
f
o
>>61118714
>MSRP $8999.99
When are you going to let IREM make a new R-Type game Ezio?
>>61118714
>outputting 1000 nits peak brightness.
Jebus Man
>>61119004
This.
>Panasonic in charge of new tech
yeah that worked out really nice for the 3DO
>>61119004
>>61119079
Is not DCR, for years there has been monitor that have 1.200k+ of DCR.
This is real contrast ratio.
>>61120191
dont give a fuck, 1000 nits ? seared eyeballs
get the fuck outta here
>>61120473
Nice reading comprehension faggot, the text says is "capable of", meaning that's the maximum it can output not the minimum.
I'm sure it can go down to the 250 to 350 nits range.
>>61118714
am I only one that is annoyed when monitor brands claim to achieve something while they are just glorified packaging company?