What went wrong, /gee/?
The bottom "muh cookies" bar is ENTIRELY Britain's fault
Fucking airstrip one can't keep it's totalitarian cuckery contained
>>61102587
>Having your privacy respected is an authoritarian cuck policy
Good goy, let us mine your data in secret
Javascript.
>>61102593
>implying you can't turn off cookies
>implying your browser doesn't notify you
>implying people even care about that dialog
>implying implications
>>61102593
>bongistan caring about privacy
Good one lad.
>>61102607
I care when it covers the login fields on my phone and its close button is too small to touch.
>>61102597
correct answer
>>61102587
>>61102593
the correct way to handle cookies is to accept them, and then drop them on the floor as soon as you close the tab/window or navigate away from that domain. All this Yuro "need consent to accept cookies" is solving the wrong problem. The problem is that websites try to store things that persist on the user's device, and browsers allow this to happen.
>>61102792
"Keep until I close the page / window" is definitely the best way to handle cookies.
>>61102792
>>61102800
Self-destructing cookies on Firefox does just that. I use it on my mobile Firefox.
>>61102587
the cookie message is the doing of the European Union.
Britain will delete those cookie messages for their citizens once they leave the sinking ship called the EU
>>61102866
Me too. Too bad the dev already announced he will not rewrite the add on for Firefox 57+
>>61102866
>>61103706
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/cookie-autodelete/
>>61102990
>sinking ship
LOL! WHAT A NICE MEME XD
HAHAHAHA
Well, actually britain is the sinking ship
>>61102866
>>61102800
>forgetting the fact that cookies store login sessions, user preferences, etc
cookies are not inherently evil