What does your font rendering look like, /g/?

>>61085204
W E E A B O O
E
E
A
B
O
O

>>61085218
Platform?

File: Capture.png (430KB, 1226x968px) Image search: [Google]

430KB, 1226x968px

2011 iMac on windows 7

>>61085239
Wangblows
Font rendering is honestly one of the bigger reasons I've stuck with it. Every time I've tried linux it just looks cartoony and over-boldened and shitty.

>>61085204
Shit

File: 1496707182163.jpg (1MB, 1312x1730px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1312x1730px

>>61085273
NEVA 4GET

File: Tokyo.png (605KB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

605KB, 1920x1200px

>>61085204

File: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.png (60KB, 259x231px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 259x231px

>>61085357
>current year
>"if X doesnt work update your drivers"

this is why tech is garbage right now

>>61085390
Only really run into that problem when you buy AMD because devs test extensively on Intel and Nvidia.

>>61085204
for gnome 3 fags not running Ubuntu that want less trash font:
>upgrade from the freetype package to freetype-freeworld in the RPM Fusion repo
this particular version uses RGBA subpixel rendering that's not in the default.
>use gnome-tweak-tool to set Font Hinting to "none" & font antialiasing to "Rgba"
>make a file named .Xresources in your home directory -- should only contain "Xft.lcdfilter: lcddefault"
this enables subpixel rendering.


Tbqh, I feel making a msttcorefonts package is pointless because Liberation Fonts exist ... and replacing Microcuck fonts like Arial, Times New Roman, Courier, etc.

Pretty sure Fedora's implementation of these fonts is outdated, IIRC. Or at least used to be. Might as well give it a look over, because, version 2 looks way better with these """newer""" freetype settings

File: tokyo-scrot.png (516KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

516KB, 1920x1080px

>>61085204
arch

File: 1490237715775.png (863KB, 1386x2033px) Image search: [Google]

863KB, 1386x2033px

>>61085204
>What does your font rendering look like, /g/?
Go ahead, guess the OS and browser.

>>61085477
go away windows and firefox

>>61085402
>completely ignoring the fact that Intel is bugged and needs microcode updates
hurrrr

>>61085522
I'm not ignoring it, its just inconsequential.

AMD has been crashing games with shit drivers in memoriam ad infinum.

>>61085477
Brave/Chrome on Android tablet.

>>61085533
>this ancient meme
enough

File: wew.png (151KB, 803x800px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 803x800px

>>61085570
googled amd change log and just clicked a random one.

>>61085625
>exactly 2 instances of crashes in Fixed Issues
>one is for a benchmark application, the other for browser
>exactly 2 instances of crashes in Known Issues
>one is simply a 3rd party application fucking with graphics, the other is an actual game
wow, fucking DOZENS OF CRASHES CONSTANTLY ALL THE TIME
IN EVERY GAME

>>61085685
There is literally a bug that causes playing a video in a web browser to crash. Changing game profiles causes any app using the GPU to crash.

AMD is garbage lol, you don't see shit like this on Nvidia drivers.

Nvidia drivers are like....
>huge list of new features
>weird shimmer on some random tree in a game fixed.

>>61085494
>go away windows and firefox
Nope.

>>61085561
>Brave/Chrome on Android tablet.
Nope.

File: nvidia best drivers.png (49KB, 956x834px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 956x834px

>>61085701
this is part of a recent Nvidia driver changelog

>>61085728
here's the link to the full .pdf
http://us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/382.53/382.53-win10-win8-win7-desktop-release-notes.pdf

>>61085701
>first W10 issue is literally browser crashing due to NVIDIA drivers
>AMD is garbage lol, you don't see shit like this on Nvidia drivers.
seriously, it's time to stop fucking posting

>>61085757
Notice how it says may crash?

The AMD one says if you have a certain card and play a video it will crash. Not to sound like a dick but the bug you are refering to as an equivalent is an edge case that you probably couldn't reproduce vs AMD having an entire model of card that couldn't play videos in Firefox.

>>61085787
>The AMD one says if you have a certain card and play a video it will crash
Did you even fucking read what you posted?
>Intermittent crash MAY be experienced in Mozilla Firefox while doing video playback on SOME Radeon RX 400 Series graphics products

It's time to face the facts, you're a fucking moron.
Not only were you completely wrong about that, but the AMD driver lists that has a FIXED issue, whereas the Nvidia one lists that bug as an OPEN issue.

>>61085836
Unless you can actually prove otherwise, the bug explanations aren't even remotely comparable.

AMD drivers cause your shit to not even wake up from sleep and your audio to die.

The latest drivers have an ongoing performance issue that causes games to be slow with freesync.

I'm glad I bought g-sync so I'll never see issues like that.

>>61085885
>this backpedaling
You're a retarded fanboy, I've seen enough here.

>>61085898
You are just pissed off that pretty much any random AMD changelog is going to be full horrible shit lol.

File: 1482153034146.jpg (43KB, 480x640px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 480x640px

>>61085836
You have to remember that this is the trip with at least 6 or 7 extra chromosomes. A real KFC double downs. Everything they post is wrong with very few exceptions.

>>61086000
I might bullshit a lot but you shouldn't take it so personally.

You are going to develop cardiovascular disease.

>>61085728
reading this list it seems like nvidia is doing gods work

>>61086042
4EVA BTFO'D HOW WILL TRIPFAG RECOVER

File: did you even finish middle school.png (152KB, 2440x595px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 2440x595px

>>61085273
>>61085402
>>61085533
>>61085625
>>61085701
>>61085787
>>61085885
>>61085911
>>61086042
>says the dumbest tripfag in the history of /g/