Mobile phone security

Kill yourself

>>61082897
why? are you triggered by something?

>>61082942
You don't know how to ask good questions. I guess that's why you weren't able to research the matter yourself and come up with your own answer instead of posting on a forum full of braindead anime fans.

>>61082970
why are you here then?

>>61082987
I'm here for the desktop threads, my man.

>>61082885
>Do they know something we don't?
Secret Services encrypt they iphones

>>61082885
iPhones are significantly more secure, including encrypting everything by default. They also allow you to say no to the botnet on first boot up.

https://www.apple.com/business/docs/iOS_Security_Guide.pdf

>>61083146

Has no idea what he's talking about.

File: 1483345004727.png (345KB, 728x945px) Image search: [Google]

345KB, 728x945px

>>61082885
ayy

>>61083325
https://www.apple
lmao

>>61084489
email. yes. but not data.

>>61084612
stfu

File: 1488988302116.jpg (222KB, 751x1386px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 751x1386px

>>61084612
>t. iToddler

File: 1492532124497.jpg (51KB, 1080x527px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 1080x527px

>>61082885
Trump is team iPhone too!

I'm yet to see a powerful leader or a billionaire with that pajeetware Androshit phone.

File: 1492445524740.png (14KB, 597x282px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 597x282px

>>61084632
nice argument retard.

CIA had 20+ 0-days for Android and none for iPhone. stay mad.

>>61084701
Why would CIA need 0days for iPhone when all iShits are backdoored out of the factory? >>61084634

>>61083325
"by default" is not an argument in these cases. The question is what the maximum level of security possible is -- they have more than enough resources to attain that level. I use an iPhone, but it would surprise me if there wasn't a more customizable and thus potentially more secure Android phone -- or maybe even one running some custom OS.

Security clearance costs money every time; whatever Android phone of the month isn't going to be allowed because of it, so it's no use speculating about its security based on this.

It is why B.Obama used the same phone for most of his tenure even as he watched the blackberry die and iphone rise in the world around him.

>>61082885
>Which is more secure: iphone or a samsung galaxy phone?
Phone security does not matter here. FSB and white house are running their own portable "cell towers" which filter out botnets like gmail/icloud and make sure that phone calls are properly encrypted.

>>61084634

https://www.absolute.com/en/partners/oem/apple

Doesn't mention anything embedded in the firmware, most other manufacturer pages(including Samsung...) do.

Iphone is provably more secure. By far. Sorry /g/ :(

iphones are miles ahead in terms of security, but android is perfectly fine for the average person.

File: 1485106609753.png (236KB, 966x390px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 966x390px

>>61082885
iPhones literally leave the factory with backdoors built in.

>>61085207
>under certain circumstances
I guess you fell for the stupid clickbait

>>61085237
2 rupees have been deposited in your loo Ranjeet.

File: Image 22.jpg (2MB, 5064x2826px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5064x2826px

>>61085134
I got bored.

>>61085315
what an argument.
racist too.

>there is a secure mobile device

unless you wrote an obscure OS that no one knows about your basiplly fucked