You know it's true

>>61057082
normies disagree

>>61057122
Normies will get used to it, as everything will be vertical smartphone optimized.

I'm all in for 1:1, 3:2 and 4:3 replacing 16:10/16:9 displays.
They're superior for literally everything but movie consumption

>>61057150
future movies will be VR anyway.

>>61057082
Monitors will soon come standard with a 90 degree turning stand.
Vertical is better 98% of the time, while horizontal is only good for videos and wide spreadsheets/blueprints

>1:1 smartphone
>1:1 thinkpad/laptop
ew
>>61057281
this

>>61057281
fucking hell, how is it not already standard? i hate that i cant mount my monitor vertically

>>61057082

unless eyes evolve to be vertical pretty fucking soon, no.

5:4 master race

>>61057082

>what is the xerox alto

nothingnewunderthesun.tiff

I hate vertical cause the monitor bottom and logo looks weird that way.

File: CAM00285.jpg (484KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

484KB, 1280x960px

This is the future

>>61057343

Toilet bowl monitors?

>>61057318
So that's why paper is horizontal...

oh wait

>>61057390

I'm going to give you a nice long time to think about exactly what you just said anon.

>>61057318
dual monitor with space between them retard

>>61057231
No, they won't. In VR movies you can't see everything without watching it dozen times

>>61057422

Think about what you just said.

>movies are a business

File: a4papersize.jpg (36KB, 590x387px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 590x387px

>>61057399
>I'm going to give you a nice long time to think about exactly what you just said anon.
please enlighten me.

>>61057447

Honestly just think about how profoundly stupid what you are saying is.

@61057478
so you don't have any argument.

okay

thanks for wasting my time, you (you)'s for you

>>61057695
>Doesn't know how to reply
Begone summer faggot.

>>61057082
I don't think that's likely to happen, more vertical space will definitely become the norm, but monitors will get there by just being 16:9 but big.

My 40" monitor with two 1920x2160 windows side by side seems like a glimpse of the future.

>>61057281
but with vertical for web browsing i'd have to set tree style tabs to autohide. with landscape i can have them visible all the time which is much better, and stretch them so that the view of the page is exactly 4:3.

>>61057127
He has a point.

>>61057082
>>61057343
3deep5me

>>61057399
>>61057440
Maybe you should start thinking for yourself a bit.

>>61057934
Nobody gives a shit about your autistic tree style tabs, that is a feature that maybe a few thousand people worldwide even know exists.

>>61058164
tree style tabs are objectively the superior tab layout. going from normal tabs to tree style tabs is like going from opening a new window for every new page to using normal tabs.

>>61057422
>Not projecting 21:9 films onto an arbitrary screen size in a virtual movie theater
We already know that 360 video doesn't work.

>>61058164
Don't you need an add-on for this?

>>61058164
It's the only feature that keeps me from enjoying Chromemium to the fullest. So fucking useful man

>>61057713
>Takes the bait
Wow you must be such an oldfag