Thoughts?

They look like headphones

you can probably listen to music on them

>>61037125
What was defective?

>>61037229
after 6 months the speaker on the right blew up. It rattles @ < 50hz

>>61037400
Typical snapheiser headphones with dynamic shitter drivers, tsk tsk

>>61037125
Just get hd600 and a good stack.

The microdetail you lose is made up by a more realistic sound signature, unless you really like bright headphones or have lost some high frequency hearing.

Diminishing returns is out in full force here

>>61037939
This.

HD600 is cheaper and better, but nobody will tell you that because that's how the audiophile market works; new and overhyped products. How else would they get people to spend money on a mature technology.

This isn't like GPUs or CPUs where every year they get better and better, headphones are a mature technology.

>>61037125
T1 Tesla gen 2 are better but also around the same price
You might want to just get something cheaper if you don't have an expensive DAC AMP

>>61037125
OP here, what would be the best way to test them?
I currently have a schitt modi 2 multibit as a dac and a vali 2 as amp(stock tube)