>dude that program you made is awesome! can I have the source

>>61033166
You're the reason I'm pro-choice.

>>61033194
/thread

I'm not going to run arbitrary code on my computer.
Any project without a makefile is not worth running on your computer.

i release source code that is unrelated to my actual program and nobody ever notices because unless your software has a linux-tier following noone is going to audit it

>>61033235
Fucking devilish.
To be honest most programs probably do this.

>>61033235

Good idea, actually..

File: 1497653470955.png (147KB, 388x527px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 388x527px

>>61033235
what if someone tries to build it

Fuck off, SPA scumbag.

>>61033734
I don't know, but so far I've not had anyone mention it despite the binaries getting 100+ downloads a month. It probably helps that they're Windows applications, I doubt more than 0.01% of winfags have the required software to compile it.

File: 1433504206201518479.jpg (96KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 800x600px

>>61033166
>my brother please help me give me the source to this my email is [email protected] please do the needful

File: 1493849842218.png (97KB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 500x281px

>be botting rs07 w custom skript.
>some boob is begging me for free script.
>copy and paste into paste bin.
>leave out antiban code.

>>61033728
it's pretty much impossible to audit the entire kernel because of its size
>linux projects
depends on the project
there are a lot of shitty old C daemons full of security vulnerabilities out there

see a frogger
pull the trigger

>>61034053
I miss you in /ptg/ threads ;_;

>>61034391
kek

>>61034391
I'm not really into games, how exactly does antiban code work?

>>61034515
And new shit that is complex enough that even an audit may not find a backdoor or intentional vuln. Auditing code is a really hard thing to do. Even harder is writing vulnerable free code. These to things combine to mean that you could easily write functional code that makes it into a project that has intentional vulns and have a way to plausibly deny you mentioned to. I wonder how many devs get paid to do this.
>mfw most people who contribute to oss are getting paid by gov to plant vulns.

<:-)

>>61034786
Depends on the anti-cheat. For VAC or other signature based anticheats, you would ideally want self modifying code to avoid the signature detection, as well as limiting certain factors that can auto-ban you if you're out ot wack (like spin rate on a spin bot).

"Antiban code" seems odd because you avoid anticheat through design decisions like above, not tack-on code. Unless it's a script that directly attacks and defeats the anticheat. Maybe it disguises memory manipulation.

so thats a no?

ok ill decode it anyway

>>61034971
With it being Runescape, it's probably human-like behavior removed from the script.

>>61033166
I used to email random people all the time ages ago asking for source code. It actually worked 99% of the time.

>>61035964
A small section that creates variations in timings for all the variables used.

>>61033235
>>61033734
I do this for tracking. The code works in both versions, but public source code shows that personally identifiable information is either hashed or deleted. The built binary doesn't do that.

>>61033211
any dick that is not stallmans is not worth sucking

>>61033982
I've tried compiling shit before but I can never seem to do it right ._.

>>61034053
I literally want to blow up India, Indians are subhuman

>>61036020
>>61035964
>>61034971
Very interesting, sounds like that'd be fun to work with.