>Multi-core doesn't matter! >Price/performance doesn't

>>61019172
Staying 22 hours in a thread doesn't matter.

>>61019172
I don't care about anything else - I just wouldn't have an AMD CPU because it's the poorfag brand.

File: IMG_2788c-678x381.jpg (44KB, 678x381px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 678x381px

>>61019193
More projection than a movie theatre.

>>61019172
>Price/performance doesn't matter!
I haven't seen anything beat an Intel build since Lynnfield.

>>61019193

How on earth can you keep making that statement with a straight face, when there is more care, more money, more thought which translates in to more quality put in to the AMD chip during construction?

Silkscreen printing on the IHS with the brand. Soldered to the substrate

Intel cuts any more corners and they are going to send you a DIY heat spreader kit because assembling the chip costs money. Then void your warranty when you didn't do what they wanted you to.

>>61019172
All true.
What's your point rajeesh?

File: intel innovations.png (421KB, 475x798px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 475x798px

>>61019337
>rajeesh
All that projection.

>>61019321
R5 1600 has ridiculous price/performance ratio. Especially when you factor in cooler+motherboard.

File: Untitled.png (34KB, 660x525px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 660x525px

>>61019390
I picked this up for $150 yesterday. Try to do better.

>*OLD* Changing motherboards every time you upgrade matters very much to us

>>61019390
7800x® is definitely superior in price/performance.
just 389$ MSRP, 6 core, 12 threads, over 30% more single core perf, 18% more multi threaded perf

>>61019436
>Comparing used hardware with new hardware
Doesn't work that way, bro.

>>61019458
>Especially when you factor in cooler+motherboard.
Also, the 1600 is $200 on PCpartpicker right now, so that's almost twice the price for the CPU alone.

>>61019461
>performance goes down as soon as it's taken out of the box!
Doesn't work that way, kid.

It's currently running at 4.3GHz. CPU-Z MT of 2097. So, with a 120GB SSD, 2TB hard drive, 16GB RAM, 500W PSU, case, DVD-RAM, and legit copy of Windows 10, find something that beats it at the level of 14 points per dollar.

>>61019458

You forgot the 140 dollar AIO minimum cooling so it doesn't throttle under load. Then the 300 dollar motherboard with half it's features disabled.

It is not a good buy in any sense of the word.

File: 1489878417165.jpg (43KB, 737x758px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 737x758px

>>61019507
u-uh i bought a 7900k off some kid for 20$ find me something that beats it at the level of bs blablabla

>>61019172
Literally all Intel has is muh gigahertz. And in a generation or two that'll be gone too.

>>61019507
Has nothing to do with performance. Used parts have no warranty. Parts are likely to die sooner. More likely to have been abused. Used parts are a risk and a gamble any way you look at it.

>>61019488
>>61019513
Doesn't work that way, kid.
We're comparing cpu price vs cpu price.
No mobo or cooler discussion allowed.

>>61019571
Ok, you got your two CPUs sitting in the case with no motherboard or cooler. Now what? Expensive drink coaster?

>>61019581
Not my problem, kid.
i don't make the rules.

>>61019550
Price/performance is price/performance. Beat it or shut up.

>>61019571

Ok, then an AMD FX-9590 at 8.4Ghz. Demolishes anything for 140 dollars.

>>61019630
>Just buy used shit and pray it doesn't break or have issues the seller didn't mention!

Yeah, no.

>>61019436
I picked up a r5 1600 for 100 yesterday, can you beat that?

>>61019688
Thank you for leaving them all for me. I made $80 on my last upgrade.

>>61019704
Not even close. The i7 2700k is at around -$100 there.

>>61019193
Been in this game too long to fall for the AMD meme. In the end Intel will stay on top.

>>61019507
>find something that beats it at the level of 14 points per dollar.
Any decommissioned 2P server, including Piledriver magny core housefires, with the best performance/price coming from dual X5560's OC'd into oblivion, and much better performance than your shitty overpriced consumer i7 coming from the plethora of SB workstations that go for pennies, including 2P ones

>>61019727
>Been in this game too long to fall for the AMD meme
Pretty sure if you never owned any AMD CPU you're just underage b&.
>In the end Intel will stay on top.
Sure, just keep praying their new arch in 2021 doesn't suck.

>>61019848

Was the Pentium 3 their last successful arch?

>>61019172
You forgot
>Data centers don't matter
>OEMs don't matter
>Hyperscalers don't matter

>>61019767
Price includes electricity cost. You can pick up a quad 6176 SE for $200 but it will cost you $600/yr to run.

>>61019885
No, it was Pentium Pro.

>>61019896
>Shifting goal posts

Fuck off.

>>61019912
Cost is cost. Buying it to sit in a corner because you budgeted $0 for electricity is 0 performance for your $200.

>>61019896
>Price includes electricity cost. You can pick up a quad 6176 SE for $200 but it will cost you $600/yr to run.
>no, it doesn't matter if the parts could be abused and well worn thanks to suicidal voltages! but electricity cost totally does bro!
Holy fuck that goal shifiting, at least learn about actually good performance/cost CPUs before shitposting
And no, it wouldn't cost 600/yr to run a 6176 SE, specially since it would be pants on head retarded to run one 24/7 instead of getting the efficiency monster known as Ryzen, and electricity isn't nearly as expensive as you are implying it is, not even in cuck countries like Germany

>>61019946
The same argument could be applied to the 2700K dumbfuck

>>61019172
wait the dies are soldered???

>>61019848
Well, AMD had ~10 years to come up with ryzen, time to give Intel the same courtesy.

>>61019948
6176 SE's are 137W chips. 4 of them is 548W. With mobo and PSU efficiency, that's over $600/yr.

>>61019970
2700k is undervolted to 1.195V and doesn't use much to begin with. Anything more efficient is only going to be a couple bucks a year, so you're looking at it taking 50 years just to bring its -$100 down to "free."

>>61020018
>6176 SE's are 137W chips. 4 of them is 548W. With mobo and PSU efficiency, that's over $600/yr.
2P isn't 4 processors dumbfuck, nice goalshifting though, yeah a fucking farm with hundreds of them will pull over 10k in electricity costs, but guess what faggot you aren't running a fucking farm
>2700k is undervolted to 1.195V and doesn't use much to begin with. Anything more efficient is only going to be a couple bucks a year, so you're looking at it taking 50 years just to bring its -$100 down to "free."
Yeah, and undervolted at 1.195 you get much lower clocks, might as well run an Atom at such shit performance
Also, undervolting it like that completely obliterates your performance/cost since you're killing performance
Might as well get a 1800X if you have such expensive electricity, even that overpriced SKU will do better than a 2700K shitted down to cuck ultrabook clocks

>>61019903

The pentium pro bore the Pentium 3 which evolved into the Core and BTFO Intel's own netburst P4 housefires

>>61020058
4P is. You can get a 4P for $200 which is pretty good performance for the price if you're not counting electricity. 2P isn't going to be any better since it's not more efficient.

>you aren't running a farm
Yes I am.

>at 1.195 you get much lower clocks
At 1.195V I get 4.3GHz.

>>61020210
>Yes I am.
Then you should be getting ready to run EBINs, or be running 1700s since you're a hobo
>At 1.195V I get 4.3GHz.
No, you don't, not even golden 2700K's did that, most needed 1.3 V to do that, with golden samples going down to 1.25 V
Post your CPU-Z validation, or don't since you're clearly shitposting

>>61019350
The fuck is this?
>only results are linkedin Intel Jews.

>>61019216
Has AMD finally managed to commercialize a CPU that can compete with the Pentium?

>>61020271
>No, you don't, not even golden 2700K's did that, most needed 1.3 V to do that, with golden samples going down to 1.25 V

Really? Would you like to see it at 4.4 then? It bluescreened at 4.5 so I dialed it down two instead of just one, but it was benching fine at 4.4.

>>61015239
kek @ this thread

>>61020355
>just trust what I'm saying!

Test

>>61019571
>unironically using the word "kid" when referring to someone
KYS fag.
Also, you HAVE to buy the motherboard (and cooler if on Intlel) for the CPU to work so it DOES factor in. Buying a pentium with a 200$ motherboard is a much worse deal than an 5 with a 80$ board.

>>61020366
https://valid.x86.fr/0z5y9q

Bumping to 4.4 seems to have made it raise the voltage a bit.

>>61020470
>a bit
Yeah, that's not a bit fucking retard, still that's a golden chip
Post your [email protected], oh wait, you can't since you are talking out of your ass

>>61020487
It just brings me back to the same page.
The validate brings it to 1.208 from 1.192 idle.

>>61020543
Yeah, because when your CPU idles it dials voltage down along with clocks, is this literally your first time OC'ing? Do you have any idea of how Intel's P-States work?

>>61020577
P states are disabled, friend.

>>61020585
If your voltage isn't locked then they aren't disabled, and you aren't actually running 1.195V but 1.216V which it's a massive difference

File: 1496325684368.jpg (71KB, 552x661px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 552x661px

Can't believe aymyd fags are trying to defend Ryzen vs a 6 yo Sandy Bridge and failing

TOPKUK

>>61020621
>resorting to wojak and plain lies
how buttblasted r u

>>61020470
pff I could run my 965 on 4.8GHz with no load and undervolt. I can guarantee you that it'll bsod the second you start prime95.

>>61020621
KEK, Ryzen still won

File: 1492127308709.png (501KB, 1102x967px) Image search: [Google]

501KB, 1102x967px

>>61020681
>Ryzen still won

How exactly?
Better price/performance
Better single thread
Better multi thread
Better OC'ing

Only wins in power consumption... barely.

This vs a flippin' 6yo 2600k ahahah

>>61020648
Willing to put an 1800X on the line about it?

>>61020707

When you have to justify being this broke and lying to yourself this hard...

I almost feel bad for your destitution and inferiority complex.

>>61019350
POO IN THE JEW

>>61019193
>amd unilaterally sweeped the whole server/datacenter market in 1hour and 43 mins
>amd had all the 6 big played on data storage on state to shill for them and talk about the new server amd is building for them
>epyc provides half the tdp of 2 xeons literally has almost 40% more efficiency
>threadripper is coming to analy rape intel
>r3's are delayed because the yields and dies are so good amd dont have many defected ccx to spare
>amd literally flipped the whole industry
>intel resulted into releasing a statement that even a 4chan user would cringe
>intel lost 13 billions in one day
>the only thing they had to anncounce is a deal with the olympics
>their stock went even more down after the deal
>literally a train wreck
>intel is going to bankrupt and amd will reign
>fuck off

>>61021558
>amd had all the 6 big played on data storage on state to shill for them and talk about the new server amd is building for them
This was the icing on the cake, the presentation was made by them and not by AMD

>>61019458
no no anon last time i heard the 7800 has 2944% more single perf
over 9999% more multi perf
it consumes only 2 watts 4 if you overclock it to 10 Thz
it comes with 36 channel memory
with 1024 pcie lanes
and costs only 10 bucks

>>61021577
well yeah this wasnt an amd show mainly because it didnt had any cringy moment

like that poor girl playing bf1 what was her name again?

>>61019172
>framerate doesn't matter

File: 35052.png (58KB, 600x500px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 600x500px

>>61020707
oh i dont know
1)its a new cpu with more COAR
2)last time i heard on assmark your precious 2600k has 8400+ and 1600 has 13000+ so yeah you can shut up
3)2600k multithreaded perf choose one
4)shit intel has better firestarters that needs a fire brigade everytime you OC something

yeah only wins in tdp cause we all know that intel never lies on tdp
literally 40 watts more than what intel projects

you have run out of arguments you have been beaten with a ryzen dildo your ass is so wide a ryzen waffer can fit in be a man and accept your faggotry

>>61019172
>buying new cpus
pretending like you need a new cpu for "work" reasons is laughable at best

File: 2f7.jpg (28KB, 601x508px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 601x508px

>>61019193
forgot your pic

File: 1489160516428.png (245KB, 800x612px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 800x612px

>>61021961

>>61020008
They had been working on Zen since 2012.

PCIe lanes don't matter!

>>61019193
imagine being this stupid and fall for marketing jews

>>61020339
Ryzen R3 and Raven Ridge APUs will, eventually.

>>61024724
I wouldn't be surprised is there's no r3's. Just 1400's at a cut rate price. They have too high a yield. And cutting down dies cost money.

>>61025638
So they're just going to drop prices on 1400's or underclock them?

>>61019172
vga don't matter

>>61019172
Soldered does fucking matter.

I swear I will never buy another jizz chip again.

>>61025638
the r3 will have igpus too, so they can't just not sell them

>>61029160
Thats raven ridge m8

File: shill.jpg (41KB, 402x402px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 402x402px

>>61019193
>poorfag
Applel shill detected.

>>61019193
t. BE!Awesome

Intel:
>hardy at workloads
>the smoothest hyperthreading
>the most solid wattage usage
>fits well with the best coolers
>has most sockets so you know they have most engineering experience
>when you upgrade, you upgrade the whole set so you can fun shipping

What did I miss?

>>61030308

>the smoothest hyperthreading

In so much that only Intel has hyperthreading. If you meant SMT IBM and AMD laugh at Intel's pitiful excuse.

File: 1399988222535.jpg (295KB, 1296x968px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1296x968px

>>61030308
>>has most sockets so you know they have most engineering experience
>>when you upgrade, you upgrade the whole set so you can fun shipping

this seems out of place. Are you trying to claim those are advantages?

>>61030308
>>61030367
>Upgradeability doesn't matter!

Should be on the list for sure.

>>61030574
>>61030367
>>61030343
Check these out: Intel:
>is like a tiger when threatened by AMD *RAWR*
>protects its processors like mama bear
>uses gum: thinks about customers dental plan

>>61019458
Cheapest x299 mobo on amazon right now is 400$. Kek

https://chiru.no/u/average_intel_owner.webm

>>61019172
>There is no market for Ryzen, everybody who needed more cores already bought Xeons of X99
>Price doesn't matter, people who need performance can pay for it

>>61031347
you know the first LCD tv was 18,000$, what's ur point

File: hedtlol2.png (67KB, 1427x575px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1427x575px

>>61032470
>Marketshare doesn't matter!

>>61032501
Motherboards are not some amazing new invention or technology.

BTW the cheapest on PC part picker is apparently this which is $260 free shipping. https://pcpartpicker.com/product/pGQRsY/asus-tuf-x299-mark-2-atx-lga2066-motherboard-tuf-x299-mark-2

Nobody's mentioning IO bandwidth, but when they do I'm sure that incucks will say that doesn't matter either.

>>61032892
Someone already mentioned PCIe lanes.

poor intlel faggots, they just can't handle a superior AMD product, it's like their hugbox has been turned upside down.

>>61019647
>Ok, then an AMD FX-9590 at 8.4Ghz. Demolishes anything for 140 dollars.
does it? why has no one showed any bench results, just verified suicide runs displaying a single core clocked past 8ghz

>>61032501
>this is the first motherboard!
>this has no features locked!
>there isn't competition!
oh wait none of that is true..

>>61032501
holy shit intel fags are so stupid

>>61020271
My 2600k ran 1.15v at 4.4ghz back in the day.

My mobo for some reason won't use anything but 1.3v now idk why.

>>61019172
QUICK GET THE I9, GET THE I9 WHERE'S THE INTERN WITH THE I9!