Thread replies: 14
Thread images: 7
Thread images: 7
File: DB2B1HkXkAEL3XZ.jpg (2MB, 2048x2048px) Image search:
[Google]
2MB, 2048x2048px
will digital art ever replace physical art?
>>
File: IMG_20170507_162706.jpg (99KB, 1023x919px) Image search:
[Google]
99KB, 1023x919px
no it wont
>>
File: 1490117139480.jpg (215KB, 500x514px) Image search:
[Google]
215KB, 500x514px
/sqt/
>>
No. Digital art is too perfect. It will always lack the small 'mistakes' most art has. You can look at a painting and see where the artist may have smudged the painting a tiny bit, you may notice a small scratch. In digital art however - this doesn't exist. It is removed with a single command. It lacks the heart and soul most art has.
>>
File: IMG_1516.png (248KB, 1132x1000px) Image search:
[Google]
248KB, 1132x1000px
With time and more neets than maybe
https://youtu.be/KAExa9P7hME
>>
File: 1498081745258.png (69KB, 402x366px) Image search:
[Google]
69KB, 402x366px
>>61018731
>>61018999
samefag
>>
>>61018731
thanks for the rad pape, friendo
>>
Digital art > physical "art"
>>
>>61019118
Nope fag, replies
>>
File: Screen Shot 2017-06-21 at 9.28.18 PM.png (112KB, 701x333px) Image search:
[Google]
112KB, 701x333px
>>61019118
OP, and I prefer going to galleries
>>
>>61018731
Not if digital art insists I live in Moonside.
>>
>>61018936
/memegenerator/
>>
>>61018731
Na, people buy art because it's unique. No one will spend big money on something that is replicated.
>>
>>61019177
its settled then aha jk yr opinion is facile
>>61018731
more DOPE jumpoffs like this pls
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Mk39x3xgUI
Thread posts: 14
Thread images: 7
Thread images: 7