Does pic related respect the freedom and community of its users?
My beard ain't long enough for emacs.
>1GB for a text editor
>Electron
don't touch it
>>61013683
its shit, vscode is better.. just switched to it after using atom for years.
this fucking piece of shit editor (atom) cant even show symbols for javascript files or find definitions..
>>61013683
its a fucking botnet
>1GB text editor
>>61013683
Sublime and Emacs are the only good fully programmable Text Editors
bloated as hell
>>61013761
vim?
>>61013683
VSCode > Atom
Just use VSCode.
>Not using vim with plugins already
>>61013683
freedom and community are mutually exclusive
emacs is the only "free" editor because autism
atom has a lot of shitheads you can shitpost with all day long but it's performance is poop and there are arbitrary limits such as only being about to open files < 1GB
honestly get on the neovim bandwagon
neovim.io
Am I missing something? Why all the Sublime fucking?
>>61014495
There was a thread about how Atom is shit so now someone posted this thread to be contrarian
>>>61014507
Op here. I didn't see that thread. I don't lurk, but only come to this place when I have a thread of my own to post. The reason I'm here today is
>to intelligent to complete the emacs tutorial
>>61013683
just use vim
ecmacs sucks
sublime sucks
atom sucks
vs sucks
vim rulez
fuck u boys im the best
>>61013749
This
>>61013749
This. Switched to vscode after a decade of vim. Intellisense, source code navigation and debugging is really well done in vscode and the vim plugin is pretty good now.
>>61014698
this
>>61014698
>>61014698
Man up you pussies. Use vi.
>electron
>sjwhub
>1GB text editor
>>61013683
>installer doesn't ask where to install and picks C:\%user%\AppData\Local\atom
>doesn't even ask for a confirmation
>>61015338
>needing to see a screenful of text at any given moment
use ed
>>61016971
>doesn't ask to confirm uninstall
>>61014597
you wont use the shortcuts shown in the tutorial, find a quick reference and memorize the ones you already used in your previous editor.
>>61016994
This, its the standard for a reason