FUCK FIREFOX

File: fastfox.png (14KB, 537x212px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 537x212px

works on my machine

File: 1490816042538.png (25KB, 1584x275px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 1584x275px

>>61008366
Don't get it why so mad

>>61008398
>violentmonkey

why this over greasemonkey

>>61008398
>Expire History by Days

Didn't know that existed, thanks anon

>>61008366
ahahhahah... got fucked by SJWs yet again...

AHHAHAHA

extensions.legacy.enabled;true

>>61008366
Pale moon 27.3.0 doesn't have this problem.

>>61008423
np get this response every time I post my addon list. It's really convenient.
>>61008416
Greasemonkey isn't webext yet. plus 4.0 version is month away. And they are looking into using some violentmonkey code.
https://github.com/greasemonkey/greasemonkey/issues/2275

>>61008366
>Firefox

Fucking kek, what is this, 2003?

>>61008533
10 rupees have been deposited to you Google Play account Pajeet,

>>61008546
>Getting paid to point out the retards

BIG MONEY BIG PRIZES

I LOVE IT

What version of Firefox and on what OS is this?

>>61008366
But they still werk™

>>61008668
Not him but I'm shown "legacy" for my 3 addons on Firefox Nightly on Ubuntu 17.

>>61008779
Oh, so it's probably a Nightly thing then. Nothing on version 54.0 on Gentoo.

File: file.png (80KB, 2306x945px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 2306x945px

What did he mean by this?

File: 1490440585728.jpg (666KB, 1266x1027px) Image search: [Google]

666KB, 1266x1027px

>nightly
as in bunch of experimental features that'll smooth out upon official release

>>61008366
Man, what a bunch of useless addons.

"Simplified the download button and download status panel"

These fucking clowns think that multi-processes and THIS justify an entire numbered release?

Is there a way to restore the download information functionality? What fucking dicks these guys are.

>>61008431
what does that even mean

>>61008431
>old man yells at cloud

File: good.png (19KB, 212x552px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 212x552px

Ok at least they fixed the ugly and retarded menu they introduced a while ago, for a smaller and easier to use version.

File: 1485203908548.png (33KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 1024x768px

>>61010158

>>61010391
Thanks, man. I wish I knew the fucking justification. It's a literal removal of features.

>>61010391
Is this what PajeetScript looks like? How disgusting.

>>61010428
Because UI/UX designers are art school dropouts that think "less is more" is a law.