RISC V WHEN?

Hopefully soon. I'm tired of poojets and jews.

>>61007812
Never.

File: MuhOCD.png (150KB, 355x245px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 355x245px

>>61007812
> dat bent pin tho..

File: 1496631279846.jpg (46KB, 665x574px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 665x574px

>>61007812
Never; like all dumb meme chip.

>>61007893
>>>/v/
kys nigger

>>61007846
>Never
What makes you think this? There are many manufacturers currently involved including AMD, Nvidia, and IBM.

>>61007850
Expensive GAS.

>>61007812
Soon, and it's beautiful. Companies will have to work on making powerful cores and decent cooling instead of meme features and botnet engines. Thank fuck. God bless the people working on or investing in this.

>>61007812

RISC V is just a meme.

>>61008216
>RISC V is just a meme.
Explain?

>>61007812
Risc-V will be the best fucking thing that has happened in tech in a long ass time.

>>61007812
Now, if you need an overpowered, expensive meme µC.
Lap/desktop processor, probably never.

>>61007812
Quite soon.

Qualcomm is a partner and this can be their means of dropping ARM and save licensing cost on a 30 year old design. The ARM ISA is old and saddled with questionable baggage like the 4 conditional bits in many instructions. Also the need to a steady stream of thumb variants suggest they know they messed up.

RISC-V is based on past experiences.

You can make your own in FPGAs already. Commercially they will come perhaps already next year but this might not be announced. Both Andes Tech and C-Sky have sold designs for years but never announced it until very recently.

>>61007812
It's already here you dingdong

https://www.sifive.com/products/hifive1/

>>61007812
Fuck risc v, where's desktop class ARM CPU? Doesn't anybody want to make money or something?

>>61009156
>tfw you realize Intel was actually winning in the mobile market when they killed off Atom
ARM is strictly inferior to x86, and the only reason it's so prevalent is because Intel literally never took Atom seriously.

>>61009156
Nowhere unless Raspberry counts as desktop

>>61009132
>320MHz
So is 1998 suddenly cool again? BTW its a fucking microcontroller.

>>61010243
There is no difference between a microcontroller and any other CPU.

>>61009132
that cant boot linux you fucking pleb

>>61010306
Demonstrably false.

>>61010344
Is an ARM M0 a microcrontroller? Is an M3? A M4? A M7?
There is no difference aside from kikery trying to rebrand trash from the 80s and 90s as "microcontrollers"

I vomit at the memes like 8053s in modern SoCs.

>32core AMD cpu on mobile coming soon with a real gpu.
Serious note I still have a Zenfone 2 and it runs fine and performs quite well. Intel obviously couldn't compete or follow through but the hardware was kind of there.

>>61010385
Many microcontrollers make a memory bus available for external code and data; those pins may or may not usable for other purposes if external memory is not used. To my mind, the defining distinction is whether a device would typically() be capable of running at least somewhat usefully without an external memory bus. () The 8051 is certainly capable, so it's clearly "microcontroller". An 8031 is the same chip as an 8051, but with the ROM contents unspecified. The lack of useful ROM would make it a microprocessor, but since it's the same chip as the 8051, it could be called a microcontroller.

>>61010406

there was not enough margin. Intel won't compete against people that sell competitive products for pennies. They could not figure out how to make a premium product for the segment.

It is the same reason IBM sold its PC segment to Lenovo.

>>61009156
>desktop class ARM
>needs to be able to run a desktop operating system
>microsoft wants to build ARM version of windows
>microsoft wants to emulate x86 apps so people don't lose out
>jewtel threatens to sue
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2017/06/intel-fires-warning-shots-at-microsoft-claims-x86-emulation-is-a-patent-minefield/

Intel is the cancer killing desktop ARM.