AMD releases intel killer CPU! Specs out!

What's it like genuinely being retarded?

>>61007278
>week old article based on fake geekbenchresult that was removed and discredited the day it was posted

Shills getting pretty desperate up in here.

>>61007402
Gonna need a way to pay off that compressor + new house

God, I fucking hate this influx of retards from r/amd

>>61007278
i bet my massive stock of 1 intel stock that its the tripfag

>>61007459
So says the arsonist from pcmr

File: chrome_2017-06-21_09-39-34.png (29KB, 775x525px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 775x525px

>>61007467
Get on the moon rocket, son

File: Mysterious Merchant.gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

>>61007459

intel is so massively butthurt that instead of annc anything remotely close to a cpu
they are going to annc that they will sponsor the olympics!
no wonder they need an olympic pool to cool down that tokamak they created

File: Bomb has been delid.jpg (43KB, 679x367px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 679x367px

>>61007278
>AMD is trying to re-enter the server market segment, Intel continues to deliver 20+ years of uninterrupted data center innovations while maintaining broad ecosystem investments. Xeon CPU architecture is proven and battle tested, delivering outstanding performance on a wide range of workloads and specifically designed to maximize data center performance, capabilities, reliability, and manageability. With next-generation Xeon Scalable processors, Intel expects to continue offering the highest core and system performance versus AMD. AMD’s approach of stitching together 4 desktop die in a processor is expected to lead to inconsistent performance and other deployment complexities in the data center.

REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

File: fecfd7229cb4cf7ac80d0a77ed823436d21406ef4424268faecba6f52014b110.gif (127KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 600x600px

>>61007574

File: 1396454086671.jpg (68KB, 894x894px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 894x894px

>>61007278
>get eternally BTFO in last thread
>make new thread in hope of different outcome

Stop shitposting about Intel you stupid fucks.
AMD is shit and overhyped.
I can't wait for new Intel CPUs to come out and see you guys crying.
LMAO, enjoy your stupid stocks while you still can.

>>61007362
/thread

File: 1496358981591.png (784KB, 899x899px) Image search: [Google]

784KB, 899x899px

>>61007459

File: 1494767421045.jpg (43KB, 630x630px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 630x630px

>>61007647
>JUST WAIT(TM)!

You shills do realize that AMD purposefully puts these results up and takes them down immediately to make you shill them, right?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
Don't be a goy, don't shill for the corporate, either Intel or AMD.

>>61007764
Why would amd post a benchmark that puts threadripper's multithreaded performance at 1700 levels?

File: 1497835428568.jpg (864KB, 1906x1536px) Image search: [Google]

864KB, 1906x1536px

>>61007647
They did just come out. And there wasn't a whole lot of crying. More like laughing.

>>61007779
To make people keep talking about it and make the community unconsciously advertise AMD products by keeping these threads on the first page. Keep in mind this exact same thing happens with other brands such as Xiaomi, Huawei, 1+, Apple, Google, Intel, Samsung and so on.

For the Pajeet who was claiming there were no benchmarks in the last thread

https://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/AMD-Epyc-legt-los-3748615.html?artikelseite=2

>>61007459
Shoo shoo Intel

>>61007362
lel

>>61007362
LMAO

A fucking sandy bridge can get that ST score

The MT score alludes to only 6 cores (albeit at 99.9% efficiency). It's probably 8 cores and highly inefficient.