SPEC updates it's CPU benchmark for the first time in 11 years

File: 1490449916731.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>60993534

>>60993534
And EPYC launches today.

It happens, when a branch predictor becomes too smart for a certain task, it's pretty much what happened with CPU-z and ryzen, difference is SPEC is used for datacenter and anyone buying datacenter hardware looks at SPEC scores, while nobody cares about CPU-z and their pathetic damage control.

>>60993534
Thank fuck, finally we can look at some real standard benchmarks instead of 3D gaymen oriented shitmarks.

File: IMG_0804.jpg (68KB, 900x505px) Image search: [Google]

68KB, 900x505px

>>60993770
>SPEC is used for datacenter
That's interesting, Pajeet, but being over 18 I recall that SPEC has been a typical benchmark for all classes of processors for decades.

Neat shilljob though, got any other grand pronouncements for us?

>May have caused Intel scores to be inflated by 5-10%
Oh shit
https://videocardz.com/70266/amd-epyc-7000-series-specs-and-performance-leaked

So..
RIP Intel?

>>60994554
What are you trying here? It's mainly used for datacenter, it's rarely used benchmark for gaymer or consumer crap.
When have you actually seen a consumer CPU review running SPECint?

>>60994606
>mainly used for datacenter
It's a cross architecture benchmark suite, and it has been used for DECADES to benchmark everything out there.

You claimed it's "mainly used for datacenter," prove it.

Also I can tell you're a poo in loo, Pajeet.

>>60995323
Yeah, now show me anything but server CPUs being benchmarked in SPEC in the last few years.
Oh yeah, from more than 2 sites.

>>60993534
delid dis

>>60993770
>>60994554
>>60994606
>>60995323
>>60995347
What the fuck are you faggots even arguing about?

>>60995411
Shut up filthy nigger