Is there anything that's open source and as fast as old uTorrent?

File: btclient_guide.png (1MB, 1500x2670px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1500x2670px

>>60988555

>>60988555
transmission

>>60988571
/thread

>>60988555

>and as fast as old uTorrent?

I was about to suggest rtorrent but you didn't ask for something faster.

>>60988573
only if it's on mac
linux version is like it's retarded cousin, missing features.
windows version resembles transmission, except it's buggy and slow

>>60988665

wut?

>>60988571
How is KTorrent? Nobody ever seems to mention it.

>>60988571
any other guides like this?

>>60988571
>winfags wish
>What is VM

>>60989321
>what is VM
A performance loss. Also
>having to run a VM for something
>thinking this is acceptable
Lel

File: 1490527472287.jpg (21KB, 427x427px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 427x427px

>>60988571
>he sneaks a pony in there

>>60989351
>>A performance loss
>for a fucking torrent client

>>having to run a VM for something
>>thinking this is acceptable
>thinking MS current bullshit is acceptable

>>60989386
Why would you rape your PC by forcing it to run 2 operating systems just so the second one can run a fucking torrent client? You're basically removing any benefit of a fast and light client by having to reserve 4-8GB of storage, 1-2GB RAM and have your processor suffer too. That's more retarded than running µTorrent in WINE.

>>60988571
Does any of those have search engine like qbittorrent?