Dead editor, thanks CIA. Should I submit to the botnet of the

>>60972071
>Visual Studio Code
>Atom
Oh well, if you don't mind waiting two hours for the JS to settle on startup, go for it

>>60972171
I mostly use Vim. If I know I'm going to be programming for 2+ hours anyways, I'll use a heavier editor. That being said, I absolutely fucking hate both of them, VS Code a tiny bit less but fuck Microsoft. Feel free to suggest any alternatives that are not using this JS Electron Chrome whatthefuckever bullshit.

For the past month, I've just used Geany. Might stick with that. It's fast, it's simple, it has features.

what's going on with CIA??

>>60972188
Just continue to fucking use Sublime. What's the problem with it being dead? The only thing it doesn't have is support to font ligatures

>>60972071
>botnet of the superior Visual Studio Code
Isn't VS code open source?

>>60972071
what the hell are you talking about

>>60972203
You can get Sublime Text 3 for free thanks to the CIA leaks.

>>60972290
Last update almost a year ago and every workplace is suggesting the use of Atom. Is there a serious IDE on the works comparable to Sublime/VSCode/Atom?

>>60972071
>I'd rather use a modern editor
what does atom have that vim doesn't?

>>60972734
Believe me when I say I'm not a fanboy of Jetbrains. WebStorm and PHPStorm both feel janky. That said, IntelliJ with all the plugins installed from the other two works way better.

Also, when writing Go applications, Gogland (presently in early access) is fantastic.

So, if you're looking for a true IDE, those work. Otherwise, I'm keen on Atom (to an extent), am exploring VSCode, still use Sublime3, and VIM+Tmux is always a reliable pro-tool.

>>60972734
https://www.sublimetext.com/3dev

>>60972279
so is chromium, it is still a botnet

>>60972071
Why not use kate?

>>60972279
not really. The source is public but it is bound to some gay ass shit microsoft patents and licenses.

Atom is shittier and ran by nu-males but at least it's MIT licensed.

Sublime is dead? Why?

jetbrains ide for bigger projects that require fancy features like easy refactoring and advanced debugging
vscode for any other programming
vim/emacs for editing text files

this will work great for a lot of people, but there are exceptions (C/C++ for example)

is there an CLI editor that isn't nano, vim, or emacs

>>60974374
It's not.

>>60974551
ed?

>>60974551
neovim

>>60974263
only if you download the binaries, they are not opensource, or use the Microsoft store,
if you compile from Arch just use visual-studio-code-oss and download the packages manually and install them

>>60973305
Thanks. I switched to Kate.

>>60972071
fuck you User #524297

>>60974263
Nigger VS Code is MIT licensed too.

>>60973305
>>60974922
kate is actually quite good
the split screens of it works better than any other text editor

>>60972188
Why not np++?

>>60979187
Loonix.

File: 1497795640408.jpg (364KB, 1280x1184px) Image search: [Google]

364KB, 1280x1184px

VSCode with VsVim plugin

>>60979153
Convenient time to switch too! I'm a long time Geany user and I just switched to KDE earlier today. Kate supports the global menu and theming better than Geany and it's quite similiar in many ways.

>>60979222
I used kate 2 years ago or so
anyone know how to get the identical theme of sublime text default on it?
only reason I used sublime was the snytax highlighting

File: 1497905755425.jpg (152KB, 625x626px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 625x626px

>>60972071

>>60979620
Just looking for a new text editor. I've learned to provoke others in order to get answers. Threads just die otherwise.