best browser.

nope

>>60971341
worst thread.

best botnet*

These fucking chrome normalfags need to get the fuck off this board

>>60971341
more or less agreed, posting from chromium
no idea how the mozilla plebs can stand the lag

>>60971518
>firefox
>lags
It's not 2014 anymore

Vivaldi

dat firefox 54 the new wave senpai

>Bookmark management is aids
>Tab management is aids
>History management is aids
>Ugly fonts (on Windows at least)
>Shitty keyboard shortcuts
>Privacy issues
>Consumes twice as much RAM as firefox
>No proper tree style tabs
>Annoying as fuck download bar
>Can't remember last download location for each site
>Little to no customization

>>60972056
so much this

it sucks
but still better than anything else :(

>>60972056
>No tree style tabs
Thank fucking god

>>60971518
corelet detected

>>60971341
>2017
>still impossible to force pop-ups into new tabs without extensions

>>60972056
what do you recommend then

>>60973013
Brave

File: Canary.png (29KB, 256x256px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 256x256px

>>60971341
Wrong.

>>60973013
There's no good browsers nowadays. The only bearable ones are Firefox, Chromium and their forks.

If you want to use Chrome use Nik's no-sync Chromium builds (Windows only) or Iridium (multiplatform).

File: Clipboard01.gif (16KB, 722x219px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 722x219px

>>60971341

Ever wondered why edge feels so much smoother than chrome.

File: IMG_4295.png (70KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 384x384px

>>60973131
>There's no good browsers anymo--
Opera

>>60973358
Closed source Chromium reskin with Chinese botnet.

Brave is a good choice?

>>60973136
goto chrome://flags
set "Force hardware acceleration" to yes

Done.

>>60973448
>ctrl+f
>"Force hardware acceleration"
>0 of 0

wew

>>60972056
Why are you describing firefox?

>>60971341
B O T N E T
O
T
N
E
T

I just tested a query that returned a large amount of rows in an HTML table

Chrome finished loading it in 13.77 seconds
Firefox finished loading it in 7.33 seconds

hmm...

File: evil_chrome.png (19KB, 288x288px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 288x288px

>>60973089
Wrong again.

File: trump.jpg (92KB, 1100x619px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 1100x619px

if by best you mean best at consuming resources and battery life

bros i need help, for some reason Chrome can't download a fucking 2.5mb csv file but Firefox can

what the fuck is going on

>>60971341
I moved back to chrome, I get higher cpu usage on firefox on my laptop these days

>>60976376

https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24610694/export-html-table-to-csv-in-google-chrome-browser

File: Mobile Browser Benchmarks.png (258KB, 2828x1708px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 2828x1708px

>>60971341
Chrome is even btfo'd on Google's own OS.
Reminder that Brave is the best android browser.
Tested on the most representative device, galaxy s5 updated to touchwiz 6.0.1. (Considering how Touchwiz is the most popular ROM and android v6 is the most used android version).

>>60971341
Worst browser

>>60973136
Firefox is getting servo, the GPU usage will go much more higher

>>60977116
>soon™

>>60971341
iridium > chromium > everything else > your shitpost

>>60971864
it still leaks

>>60977116
and if I want it to go easy on my resources?

>>60978851
How? I use my firefox browser for over 8h at a time and no memory leaks occur.

>>60971341
>open 4chan, youtube and twitter
>2 GB of RAM
>uBlock alone is 100 MB

>>60971518
Chrome lags more than firefox. Do you think it is 2014?

V I V A L D I
I
V
A
LA VIDA LOCA
I used Chrome, Firefox, Otter Browser, Opera and Vivaldi and last two I found the best suited to my tastes. It's a shame Otter has issues with some sites.