What went right?

>>60953313
Nothing. They fucked up.

File: humanity vs skylake x.jpg (755KB, 1356x668px) Image search: [Google]

755KB, 1356x668px

>>60953313
>What went right?
The fire. THE FIRE RISES.

>>60953313
140 Watts TDP... that shit it's going to burn...

>>60953323
>>60953371
>>60953442
ITT people who can't afford an i9

>>60953477
But i can afford it, and i'll buy Threadripper.

>>60953477
0 effort see me after class

File: 1496686124814.jpg (84KB, 640x429px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 640x429px

>>60953371
THE FIRE RISES

how low clocked are the 18 cores going to have to be?

anything above 2.8 ghz is going to be melting steel

>>60953523
2.7 base clock and probably some ~2.9 all-core turbo. I wonder if we need a doomguy for the case of someone OCing it to 4 niggahurtz.

>>60953313
Everything.

I wonder if it can run Crysis.

>>60953371
The person doing that is an idiot.

I'd rather have the natural gas release burn off instead of it pooling in the valley suffocating animals.

>>60953485
Same here.

>>60953477
Enjoy your cut down Xeon water boiler.

Bigger number therefore better! Can't wait for the double digits, then we're be getting into the true performance before they rebrand it with a smaller number!

>>60953323
Dont be an asshole.
Apparently, the chips can scale very well to near 5.0 ghz, but unfortunally its held by thermal jizz.

Also, on this release intel is increasing L2 / reducing L3 while changing bingbus to meshbus. If these things will do good only time will tell.

>>60953854
>scale very well
While pulling over 300watts of pure holohoax through the socket. No, anon, clocking something to the moon is never the answer.

>>60953648
And now you have a forest fire, congratulations

Where the fuck are the reviews for Skylake-X? So far I've only seen two, one from Hexus and the other from Bit-tech (which I've never even heard of).

>>60953313
Well, at the very least, you CAN overclock it to 4.6Ghz, even if it means 100°C under a 240mm AIO.

The box looks nice.

>>60953313
>>60953323
/thread

>>60953477
i bet people can afford an i9
but they cant afford cern level of helium to cool it down
or a tokamak reactor to sustain its energy

File: 1461226259654.gif (370KB, 206x176px) Image search: [Google]

370KB, 206x176px

>>60954054
>even if it means 100°C under a 240mm AIO

>>60953313
Everything, it's really the best way to start a fire.

>>60954777
Kekd

>>60953371
That's a big chip

>>60953313
AMD

File: 1364036300946.jpg (128KB, 676x437px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 676x437px

>>60953313
>alright we need to explore new markets, anyone has any ideas?
>how about ISIS?
>that's genius
>introducing i9
>over 9000MW power in a single chip

>>60955897
4 U

>>60953494
DELID THIS

File: 1497287287786.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>60953494

>>60953313
Not a damn thing.

>>60953313
housefires

Nothing.

It is a pretty good lighter

>>60953987
>can melt steel beams
I fuckin lol'd hard

File: Mysterious Merchant.gif (4KB, 452x523px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 452x523px

>>60953477
PLS BUY INTELS. I WORK AT INTEL>

File: 62f.jpg (36KB, 630x630px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 630x630px

>>60954777
kek'd and checked

File: Screenshot_20170618-134239.png (906KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

906KB, 2048x1536px

>>60953313
Nothing. It all went wrong.

>>60953477
Intel expects better effort than this, Goldstein. No shekels for you

>>60957106
>not using legacy captcha

File: intel fans enjoying skylake-x.jpg (263KB, 1600x851px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 1600x851px

>>60955028

>>60953313
Not gonna lie, former Intel buyer here. This is fucking hilarious watching them crash and burn. But in all seriousness we can't let these guys start selling RAID unlock codes.

File: NM06k3d.png (123KB, 828x488px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 828x488px

>>60958088

File: Jewripper.jpg (190KB, 1919x1080px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 1919x1080px

>>60955897
You call that a big chip?

>>60956236
>8.9 million died
>not 3.5

>>60953442
Meanwhile, AMD's 8-core EPYC is 155-170W at 2.9GHz
And who was the housefire again?

>>60960732
>8 memory channels and 128 PCI-E lanes
It's like you're not even trying anymore, beawesome. Put your trip back on.

File: Screenshot_2017-06-18-19-54-57.png (82KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 1280x720px

>>60960732
moron

File: D6AW8QL[1].png (93KB, 755x818px) Image search: [Google]

93KB, 755x818px

>>60962244
>>60960761
>>60960732
It's like someone is lying on the internet.
Why would someone do that.
Just outright lie like that!?

>>60960342
The image predates 970.
It could be updated though.

File: 1392100729337.png (73KB, 744x1340px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 744x1340px

>>60960732

>>60962281
>mfw I want a 7551P but it will probably cost over $3000 without even counting motherboard pr RDIMM costs

>>60962335
>>2000USD
Sub $2k according to that.
Though maybe give $500 wiggle room for retailers and whatnot.
RAM prices is where you'll get fucked though.

>>60962335
The 7501 should be under $3000

File: be_the_change_you_want_to_see_in_the_world.jpg (46KB, 590x525px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 590x525px

>>60953313
> tfw the jews built their own ovens this time

>>60953871
All measures of 300W was the system not the cpu only asshat.
Anyway, dont expect 18 cores to hit 5ghz. Apparently 10 cores sweet spot is around 4.5-4.7, good but unfortunally fucked by tim jizz. Also monstrous pricing.

>>60953313
Single core performance is extremely high
Ability to overclock pask 4.7ghz

But its a fucking housefire that requires a custom water-cooling loop.

File: i9way.png (36KB, 756x719px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 756x719px

Gaming performance I guess

>Not bad for thermal throttle on lightly threaded applications

File: 1497630843815.png (36KB, 756x719px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 756x719px

>>60963515
I'm surprised that a 10 core even preforms this well.

File: ButmyOC.png (20KB, 625x349px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 625x349px

>>60962914
>system load is at most 30w

It pulls nearly 350w when OCed

>>60963534
I'm surprised that 1600 is doing that well.

>>60962909
sick burn

>>60953313
pretty much everything

>>60962909
Screen'd

>>60953477
I can afford an i9 but I can't afford a new house every time it decides to utilize turboboost.

>>60963537

This is one of the greatest shitshow cpu launches of all time

Bravo intel

>>60953477
Yeah, I'm going to need a lot of cash to build a new house after the housefire that this shit will cause.

>>60953313
it doubles as a nuclear reactor

>>60963607

Too bad it can't power itself

>>60953477
Agreed. If you can afford it, the i9 is more than recommended. Scared of it catching on fire? Just buy two then!

>>60963691
>Just buy two then!
To be sure it catches fire?

>>60960311
Where's the smaller, more believable version of this?

File: 1494800447801.png (174KB, 558x592px) Image search: [Google]

174KB, 558x592px

>>60953313
Nothing

File: epyc.jpg (44KB, 957x539px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 957x539px

>>60963793
Got you covered.

>>60953477
I can afford it. For the same price however I can also afford a variety of other devices for my setup or three-four new guns I want or a luxurious vacation to another country.

Or a multitude of things really. Imagine 2500 dollars worth of magic cards.

The point is its just fucking retarded to pay this much for a chip which is stillborn and had to be delidded to not cause a house fire.

Fuck off shill.

File: Kikeripper.jpg (200KB, 1919x1080px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1919x1080px

>>60963793

>>60953485
This desu. Or just a dual xeon build instead but probably thread ripper since Intel it's fucking cancer right now.


There is literally no reason to own an i9 its all negative.

>>60963701
Underrated post.

>>60962914
>Also monstrous pricing
This is actually the worst part, $1000 for 44 PCIe lanes, shit is ridiculous. I don't even know who these CPUs are meant for. Who the fuck is Intel Walletripper for? Threadripper is probably going to be a much better deal for actual workstation use, so what's left, gaming? Who the fuck wants to buy a $1000 CPU for gaming, even if 32 PCIe lanes are needed for 2 graphics cards the CPU price is still ridiculous, you could get that for $600 previously and Threadripper is probably going to have a model <$1000 with 64 lanes.

I have no idea who is even supposed to buy Skylel-X Walletripper edition at this point.

File: 1497748013882.jpg (154KB, 1024x864px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 1024x864px

>>60953987
I'm dying right now at this thread this shit is beyond funny

>>60963873
this
>500$ mobo
>200$ in ram
>1000$ cpu
>300$ in cooling min
>120$ for 1200w psu

and for what? near 10% performance gains compared to a 300$ Ryzen 1700 OCed?

>>60964183

>truth

>>60963914
The interesting part, if you consider gaming, is that ryzen is already performing somewhat up to par, thanks to intel mediocre performance increase in single thread last years.
For games that require brutal Single thread performance, yes intel is superior, but bottom of barrel is, ryzen is showing to be enough, even for high frame rates. For optimized games, ryzen is getting superior, im sick of seeing my BF1 almost all time topping 100% cpu.

I have an 7700K, 5ghz, its a fantastic rig for gaming, 1440P 144hz, however, if i just install vmware, even not using any VM together, i find stutters. I want to use several VMs for work, and i dont want to maintain 2 computers here.

From my perspective i would get an intel 8 cores, but with this bullshit of capped pci lanes + tim jizz, +price, i dont want pay 1000$ for a cpu. Where i live, taxes make the cpu almost 2000$. For probably some tax schemes, the most costly ryzen came here at 600$, 1800x, which is a nice price. If TR is here in the same way, i will probably jump red.

In the end, the possibility of OC 4.5 X 4.0, if confirmed, on a TR, i wouldnt care and would get either 10 or 12 core TR.

>>60963914
Intel has all sorts of virtualization and enterprise features that AMD does not

>>60964614

like paying for raid

intel is the best

>>60963537
sorry i would say 300W. Still, its drawing a lot, and its considerable due to ST performance.

>>60963515
Total war engine is a shit no matter what you throw at it. I have on 7700K with 1080SLI, on attila this shit barely maintains 80fps.
Some game engines like this War engine and bethesda horrible gamebyro are both abominations that should be scrapped.

Again, no matter, the core count shift is going to make IPC less relevant, as developers will need to adapt to it.

OVERCLOCKED I9 CAN'T MELT STEEL BE.. Wait, maybe it can.

>>60964614
That is one of the things that are worring me. I want to run vmware, but it seen AMD support still is not the best to date.

At least, it seen, infinte fabric seen to be better on TR than on ryzen according to rumors.