Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: pan1478341987.jpg (20KB, 630x420px)
20KB, 630x420px
Is Google capable of at least imitating some basic ai, or they just throw unlimited computing power at problems and hope some montecarlo performs better than bruteforcing, or at least no one will will call them out?
I mean, this is the wikipage of the supposedly best human player no one heard of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Sedol , color me unimpressed.
Could DeepMind produce e.g. a fundamentally different chess engine that at least put up fight against modern engines? I don't think so.
>but muh GAI singualrity
so what is the best way to profit from the ML meme? Drive up hype and sell high?
>>
I licked a negro once
>>
>>60943812
How did it taste?
>>
>>60943812
eww
>>
Apply ai to some process that has traditionally been done by human brain. Make it more efficient that way.
Find out problems that were too difficult for humans to solve but ai can do.
There should be lot of opportunities out there since just a few year ago the industry didn't exist. For 99.9% we are still in the non-ai world.
Or find out a way to collect data. Data seems to be the most valuable when applying ai. Google and some of its competitors give away their research and tools for free because they know they win with data in the end. What not to do is to try to make a better proprietary version of tensorflow.
>>
File: 1494262909612.jpg (55KB, 500x333px) Image search:
[Google]
55KB, 500x333px
>>60941465
Chess is a fucking joke compared to go.
No other algorithm on earth has come close to beating even a low tier professional go player before.
>>
>>60941465
If Jewggle is so good at AI why do we have to identify cars and signs for them.
>>
>>60944271
t. google shill
no one plays go, computers beating humans is old news, try competing with other engines
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2