>2133MHz >2133MT/s ?????? which one is correct, gee?

>>60940860
MT/s I think.
The clock itself rus at about 1066MHz, but since it's DDR, as in Double Data Rate, it can transfer data at 2133MT/s, or millions of transfers per second.
They just call it MHz anyway because easier.

>>60941031
are you implying microsaft is lying once again?
first MB instead of MiB, now MHz instead of MT/s. Really makes you think.

>>60941101
Yeah, well, everyone does it. It's not really lying. MiB and MB are really close together (and are clearly stated in storage devices). MiB is larger anyway.
MB is base 1000 and MiB is base 1024, so it makes more sense in computing anyway (but is of course, non IS).
As for memory speeds, you can easily deduce it from context. Nobody is making 4000+MT/s memory, so you know what MHz srands for in that case. It's just a technicality even, as you could call a data transfer a cycle and MHz would be valid.

>>60941183
This.

>>60941101
>microsaft is lying once again
Yeah, it's "microsaft" that's manufacturing ram, you fucking mongoloid retard.

>>60941183
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gskill-trident-z-ddr4-4000-memory,4362.html
??????????

>>60942823
RAM makers call 2133MT/s sticks PC3-17000 or PC3L-17000, not "2133MHz" you retarded stupid nigger.

>>60940860
>give up your knife so Mohammed can kill you easier
RIP UK

>>60944309
Still better than canada