>2017 >non-replaceable DDR3 RAM

mac books haven't had replacable ram in half a decade, my chink friend

>>60937106
Yea but why the fuck are they still using DDR3?

File: grapes_narrowweb__200x263.jpg (10KB, 200x263px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 200x263px

THEY GOT YA BY THE BALLS

>>60937110
ddr4 is a fad

one of the few intelligent things that apple does.

Most laptops use DDR3 because it saves money. Also the MBP doesn't just use DDR3 it uses something called LPDDR3 which is more special than a normal laptop.

Honestly you're pathetic /g/, if you can't afford it just fucking stop talking about it instead of bashing it all day.

>>60937089
>>60937110
DDR3 at the time is cheaper since skylake still has the DDR3 memory controller Apple saved a few dollars by giving users slower RAM, it's not like they will need the faster speed anyway

>>60937114
>implying macfags have balls

>>60937138
That's the Kabylake model, there is no reason for the 2017 MBP to be using DDR3.

>>60937137
my laptop has 1.3v ddr3 it's not special

>>60937160
Apple doesn't use DDR3 they use something called LPDDR3, its their proprietary RAM that is 100 times more durable than normal ram and runs cooler.

>>60937149
Might still be cheaper for them to use DDR3 from both a cost for the memory itself and not having to engineer a new motherboard since kabylake can just be a drop in replacement for the existing board design

>>60937173
2/10 bait

>>60937189
That's just lazy though...

Do you guys run like really intense programs that you need cutting edge everything?

>>60937353
Probably not considering the average use case of a MacBook, but for the price you pay you'd think there would be a bit more cutting edge technology than just the front part of the unibody that lacerates your wrist over time.

File: Screenshot_3.png (25KB, 330x141px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 330x141px

>>60937089
>2017

File: cook_hero.png (359KB, 575x657px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 575x657px

>>60937149
>there is no reason for the 2017 MBP to be using DDR3.

gotta save a few cents anon

After all it is still server quality ram

>>60937137
Nope, Apple marketing chief Phil Schiller says it's to save battery life.

>The MacBook Pro uses 16GB of very fast LPDDR memory, up to 2133MHz. To support 32GB of memory would require using DDR memory that is not low power and also require a different design of the logic board which might reduce space for batteries. Both factors would reduce battery life.

https://www.macrumors.com/2017/04/03/ddr5-ram/

>>60937089
DDR3L memory has lower power consumption than DDR4
and applel is using 21233MT/s memory anyway. No reason to use DDR4.

>>60940800
>have one of the shittiest battery life
>use pajeet-tier poorfag ram to save up battery life
>it's still bad as fuck even compared to some 100$ chinese laptop

>>60941038
>pajeet tier poorfag memory

>>60941038
>2133MT/s DDR3L CL11 memory
>literally the highest SO-DIMM option
>better than DDR4 in power consumption and not noticeable slower
>pajeet-tier poorfag ram
?????????

>>60937173
>>60937137
>apple uses """"""""""""""""""""""""""special"""""""""""""""""""""""""" ram
>literally off the shelf DDR3LP
>>>/facebook/

>>60937089
why do you need so much ram you stupid faggot? what page on 4chan you go to that can use so much ram?

>>60941485
To make your laptop future-proof.

>>60937089
I want to know what he is looking at.