this is the sample
James A. Donald wrote:
> Furthermore, it cannot be made to work, as in the
> proposed system the work of tracking who owns what coins
> is paid for by seigniorage, which requires inflation.
If you're having trouble with the inflation issue, it's easy to tweak it for \
transaction fees instead. It's as simple as this: let the output value from any \
transaction be 1 cent less than the input value. Either the client software \
automatically writes transactions for 1 cent more than the intended payment value, or \
it could come out of the payee's side. The incentive value when a node finds a \
proof-of-work for a block could be the total of the fees in the block.
Satoshi Nakamoto
As I said before 0.27 btc for (now 19 emails) between Satoshi and other individuals between 2008 and 2009 , bonus a few chats that I found interesting.
Also I think you know who James A. Donald is...
well I could go lower than 0.27 but yeah... depends
I'm a gigantic faggot btw
What the fuck is this shit