Intels golden age thread Those invited: sandy bridge through

File: 1454197684503.gif (531KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

531KB, 800x450px

>>60885971
>mfw soldered CPU

>>60885971
>haslel
>golden anything

File: 3570k.png (194KB, 1439x947px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 1439x947px

:^)

File: 1373025886404.jpg (29KB, 365x512px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 365x512px

>>60885971
haswell a shit, everything went to shit starting with haswell.

t.3770k owner

No competition and 99% of ppl use their PCs as Facebook machines.. there was no point to innervate it was all about maximizing profits

>>60887114
>innervate
Cledus please leave.

I5 2500k reporting in

4460 just chillin

>1.32V only gives me 4.3GHz on a 2500k
IT'S NOT FUCKING FAIR

>>60887449
jesus fuck you got a terrible one

I get 5.2 with 1.78

>>60887482
>1.78V
RIP

File: 12423525.gif (499KB, 480x228px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 480x228px

>>60887482
>1.78

>>60885971

Previous Gen builds.
-i7 960: Clocked to 4.5GHz on noob settings, might have been able to go further. Preferred to stay at 4GHz for stability and to have a nice clean base clock for the RAM to handle.
-i7 2700k: Bumped up to 4GHz for small boost for barely noticeable boost.

>>60887499
it's been stable for years.

i've been at 5.2 since sometime early 2014

>>60887627
>>60887482
i'm retarded, i was reading out my pll

File: huh.png (66KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 1000x1000px

>>60887482
>1.78

>>60887138
I'm a level34 country and western druid.
Don't tell me what' t' do.

2600k
4.2ghz1.15v
4.6ghz 1.32V
5.0ghz 1.51v

>>60887709
Looks a bit stubborn there towards the end but you can get away with it if you have decent cooling

Also got any temps?

File: 1491214431038.png (42KB, 174x187px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 174x187px

>Mfw Still using a 920
>At Stock Clock

>>60885971
processor : 11
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 44
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU X 980 @ 3.33GHz
stepping : 2


plan to go threadweaver

>>60885971
i7 5600U being used as a desktop.
Usually found in ~$1000 setups, I got it with the laptop for 300.

Broadwell was the last good CPU architecture.

>>60885971
I had a 930, sold it for a 975

>>60885971
6700K reporting in.

>>60888419
>>60888223
Not invited

>>60886090
I dunno, my 4790k @4.7 on air is pretty comfy.

>>60888525
Skylake and Kaby Lake are easily Intel's best recent CPUs.

>inb4 delid this
You're implying enthusiasts don't delid their CPUs anyway so why the fuck are you trying to make a meme out of it?

File: Screenshot from 2017-06-13 15-54-54.png (9KB, 368x59px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 368x59px

>>60885971
Right now, you can get awesome LGA 1366 hardware for really cheap.

I was using a Core2 Quad Q6600 for a really long time, and finally decided to spend a little bit of money to get my compile times down a bit.

I got a machine with two 6 core xeons running at 3.06 GHz, 48GB of RAM, and a bunch of extras for $300USD. Very good decision, I am not sure why people are buying $500 quad core skylake parts that perform the same.

>>60888559
Maybe if you read my post you would understand why you're not invited

3570k @ 4.5 with 1.23V

god a decent chip this time unlike my q9550

File: delid this.png (334KB, 679x702px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 679x702px

>>60888559
>Trying to turn DELID into some sort of "hardcore badge of honor"
>When it's really hilariously stupid horseshit you have to go through soley because Intel are a bunch of cheap-ass bitches

>>60888577
>Sandy Bridge through Haswell
Haswell and Broadwell were complete shit though. Ivy Bridge was borderline shit. Sandy Bridge, Skylake, and Kaby Lake are objectively Intel's best CPU series.

>>60888584
I don't disagree that it's bullshit for Intel to cheap out on the IHS paste, but I do think it's bullshit of you to imply that people on /g/ don't delid their processors in the first place.

>>60888578
3570k @4.2 with 1.2

Not as lucky but might be able to reach higher clocks if I decide to delid

>>60887755
Mid 50s for everything
Custom loop doesn't seem to care about the voltage.

>Double Dubs
checked

File: nJ_yTmVkKyM.jpg (52KB, 507x525px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 507x525px

>>60888605
You are the *autistic screech* of this thread.

This thread is for older generation intel processors, no one asked for your opinion. We were simply discussing our AGING processers not your fresh out of the deliding tool over priced shit cpu.

With that being said you're still not invited no matter how much you shill for the new gen processors.

File: 0.jpg (446KB, 1300x1020px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1300x1020px

HEDT golden age was the X58

Dat 6 core 980x

>>60885971
i7 920 reporting in.

File: linkin star.jpg (122KB, 500x476px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 500x476px

>>60888605
>[...] Skylake, and Kaby Lake are objectively Intel's best CPU series.
You're out of your fucking mind, Intlel shill.

>>60888605
Go fuck your selfie.

>>60887499
>>60887525
>>60887663
why is it bad?

>>60888673
>no one asked for your opinion
do you not know how anonymous imageboards work?

this isn't leddit where you can group-downvote and hide the meanie who dares interrupt your precious circlejerk.

Glad to see lots of nehelams in here. I still think it was a more important jump over core2 than sandy vag was over it.

Anyway still got my old xeon x3470 (replaced i5 750) in my old machine as a spare and test rig as it still pretty much does everything, just hotter.

>>60887391
This

>real engineers went to the moon with slow ass computers
>modern processors can emulate all that shit 500 times over
>/g/ bitches about microimprovements in-between generarions

>>60888819
1.78V would fry that chip instantly.

File: vic.jpg (29KB, 644x425px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 644x425px

>>60888852
Yeah, FUCK people posting on the dedicated technology board of a Chinese finger painting website wanting to see improvements in technology. I was perfectly happy back in prehistoric times, hunting for my dinner with a spear and living in a cave.

Why did things have to change, bros? ;_;

>>60885971
i5-3320M reporting in
>inb4 dual core

I have an 950 and a 3930k. Some of the vidya wont utilize the 6 cores tho, so planning to get a 6600k or 4930k

>>60889022
Not an argument.

>>60886944
3770 and 3770s here, comfy af

>>60888559
Are you fucking high?
The 6700k and 7700k are like 3% faster than the 4790k

They are shit.