This score seems really, really, really off. Really gets the noggin joggin.
>>60884868
Fake, those multi-core scores are 1700-level
>>60885265
That's what I was confused about. No way those multicore scores are right.
>>60884868
>>60885265
the only benchmark nowadays that isn't biased towards intel is cinebench tho
wccfturd, right? it's wccfturd.
>>60885597
I spent 3 minutes on that gif. Tempted to spend more.
ran my overclocked 3930k for comparison
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3104625
i'd buy the single core score but multicore is either bullshit or their stuff scales like ass?
cinebench scores and timed compiles when
>the link to the leaked benchmark on wccfshit is a 404
https://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/3097893
>>60885621
It's definitely bullshit. 1800X can pull better multicore scores on Geekbench v4. http://browser.primatelabs.com/v4/cpu/search?dir=desc&q=%221800x%22&sort=multicore_score
>>60884868
gotta be fake, multicore is way too close to my 1600
https://browser.geekbench.com/v4/cpu/3104872
Geekbench is generally garbage.