>tfw x86 is still not fucking dead

>>60867592
Who are you quoting?

File: 1495123428921.png (6KB, 204x248px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 204x248px

>>60867603
his feels

>Intel will be dead in your lifetime
Post yfw for that feeling.

File: 1491353905432.png (439KB, 789x720px) Image search: [Google]

439KB, 789x720px

>tfw OP is still not fucking dead

>>60867592
x86 is dead on linux.
>linus haven't fixed the 2k38 bug
>meanwhile smug engineers at BSD already had it working
If you're using x86-only chips, install BSD now

File: XBiB70m.jpg (528KB, 400x1499px) Image search: [Google]

528KB, 400x1499px

>>60867592
x86 is going to outlast your miserable life

>>60867904
Damn, that's a funny comic.

File: 1497038787544.jpg (315KB, 786x800px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 786x800px

>>60867592
>tfw I am still not fucking dead

File: eila.jpg (43KB, 872x480px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 872x480px

>>60867627

>>60867592
x86 is far from dying, one solid proof is that it's being emulated by other architectures instead of improving their own architectures
As much as I hate x86 and all the other CISC-y architectures, it pains me to say x86 is not going to die anytime soon. Not until some other architecture comes with a silicon implementation that could justify the cost of porting their software to the newer architecture. In short a new CPU that fucking wrecks everything in the performance per watt graph

>>60868222
>porting their software to the newer architecture
How much software made since the end of the 90s have been made in ASM?

File: 1489639071588.gif (20KB, 633x758px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 633x758px

>>60867592
Unless it happens tomorrow, I doubt it.

>>60867592
Every time Intel comes close to killing x86, AMD shows up and saves it.

>>60867603
you arent funny

File: good..png (526KB, 625x770px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 625x770px

>>60867627

>>60868982
wtf I hate AMD now!

>>60869052
>gives the consumers what they want for a competitive price
>contributes to open source programs
>somehow the bad guy

>>60868580
Send me your C compiler that will compile shit to work on my brand new chipset that I'm designing.

File: 1488992885129-a.jpg (50KB, 406x364px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 406x364px

>>60869097
>contributes to open source programs
In what timeline?

>>60869117
This timeline: http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/open-source/

File: 96682986d6106941a55989a09240e5697616be3b_hq.jpg (25KB, 500x509px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 500x509px

>>60867627