Give me one reason why you aren't using something like Google Authenticator to do Multi-Factor Authentication on any site/service that allows it.
So you're using a password manager, big ducking whoop, what if someone gets to it? They can pretty much take over your whole online life.
MFA is the way to go.
>>60861215
My online "life" is worthless, let them take it.
>using a password manager
Why would you implying I'm a gullible and naïve moron? That's quite rude
>>60861285
>>60861215
nice samefag fail, kike
>>60861285
Fair enough, but for any service that in any way affects your finances(has your card info) and any "root" service like your main email account you HAVE to have MFA.
It's just irresponsible to not do it. It adds maybe 20 seconds to login time but makes you much more secure.
>>60861293
I did not want to insult you, I just see it being recommended a lot on /g/ as a sort of all-encompassing solution for on-line security.
>>60861285
>>60861215
ahahahahahaha fucking fail
kill yourself Shill
>>60861306
You gotta samefag sometimes. This is important.
You ought to use MFA at least for your main email and any service that has your bank info.
>>60861322
I'm not shilling I'm educating, Google Authenticator is just an example, use any form of MFA you want, SMS, email, hardware token, but use multi-factor auth.
>>60861215
I only don't use 2FA when the website doesn't give me it as an option
>>60861215
>what if someone gets to it?
>what if someone comes to your house, puts a gun to your head and makes you unlock all of your accounts?
Both scenarios are equally likely, password managers are the more privacy friendly option.
>>60861215
>>60861285
>>60861307
Lmao, worst samefag ever.