Are Jumboframes on 1GbE BS?

>>60860690
jumpgrams are anywhere with ipv6 and an mtu of over ~1500. I'd have to look up the exact number. It doesn't matter, you shouldn't need them. Whatever host you send a jumpgram to will probably need to fragment it to send it past the next link anyways

>>60860690
No, but your ISP doesn't support it anyway, so it's only going to benefit you for local file transfers.

>>60860690
No, they are not BS. It's a pretty simple common sense thing to allow and use, same as HDD block sizes got bigger with the much bigger drives and so on.

But as >>60860940 indicated, most ISPs will not support them.

>>60860690
Yes and it has to be the same across every piece of equipment so it's more effort and potentially more harm than it is good.

>>60860940
Its for a server I have running that serves large video files for editing stations.

Should I enable it at 9000?

>>60860940
And even then not all devices play nice with it

>>60860690
You run a home file server without them?

>>60862812
If you can configure all the NICs and shit inbetween to play nice with such, go right ahead, it can significantly help file transfers.

>>60862838
It’s for work. Editing.

>>60862850
There’s multiple machines connected via a single cisco switch. Some are iMacs some are windows.

It seems when I enable it it works nice for a bit then troublesome and people complain it’s gotten slower. So I just leave It disabled.