hy

python is a lisp flavored bash
hy is a lisp flavored python
can we go more retarded?

>>60848670
>python
>lisp flavored
wat

>>60848670
>functions are objects
>therefore lisp

File: 1482170812547.jpg (114KB, 350x420px) Image search: [Google]

114KB, 350x420px

>>60847732

>>60850483
can you elaborate? or are you just going to spill the bullsoykaf?

>>60850483
I'm curious about your experience as well.

>>60847732
>http://docs.hylang.org/en/stable/
am i to understand it executes lisp in a python environment?

>>60847732
hy life

>>60847732
Is it like Scala for Python?

Looks interesting

>>60847732
>language to language compiler meme
>source: meh tier language
>target: meh tier environment
Good idea, anon.

>>60853520
What could be better than Lisp?

>>60853818
C, Perl, Bash, COBOL, MUMPS, RPG, PHP, JS and VBA. For example, until I find more cancer.
In particular if by Lisp you mean not CL which is the only Lisp I barely accept.

>>60854072
Scheme.

>>60854079
Hell no, there is a reason that CL as a successor isn't hipster-minimalistic and that's because Steele learned from his mistakes.

>>60854115
Do you honestly prefer native Python? I noticed it was missing from your massive list. If not, why not use Hy?

>Hy
>Functional Python
>Python

>>60854153
I don't prefer any of them. That's the point, why - assuming I'd be forced to use the Python environment for some reason - would I go through the trouble and compile some shit tier language into another? That's really like CoffeScript to JS, a.k.a. without actual net gain.
Why would I compile Perl to VB?

>>60854231
Fair enough.

File: Screenshot_2016-12-16_13-00-24.png (341KB, 553x1063px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 553x1063px

>>60847732

 #! /usr/bin/env hy
(print "I was going to code in Python syntax, but then I got Hy.")