Which text editor does /g/ use?

File: 1089146.png (22KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 400x400px

>>60825717
Atom

>>60825717
BRACKETS
GET REKT NOOBING SCRUBS

VS Code

>>60825717
kate

cat > code.c

>>60825717
For txt: TextEdit
For Web Development: Nespresso

>>60825749
Brackets automatically detects indentations like a champ

File: sublime-text.png (61KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 800x600px

>>60825717
Sublime Text 3

File: Screenshot_20170609_120833.png (31KB, 640x771px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 640x771px

notepad.exe

>>60825840
Plus the extensions, the live preview, and everything.
And I had thought >>60825844 Sublime spoiled me prior.

My only complaint is that it maxes at two split screens (still one better than most though)

File: ee.png (7KB, 788x462px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 788x462px

>>60825717
eastern european notepad

File: 1477142285835.jpg (90KB, 563x675px) Image search: [Google]

90KB, 563x675px

Vim

>>60825740
You've convinced me:
https://atom.io/packages/activate-power-mode

Vano

I use gedit

nano for really small things

>>60825717
These brain expanding memes are so funny

>>60825740
Speaking of Atom:
>Github makes Atom
>Github makes Electron
>yet when announcing typescript support for Electron, the editor in all their screenshots is actually Visual Studio Code:

https://electron.atom.io/blog/2017/06/01/typescript

Kinda embarrassing .

Notepad++ for single files

IDEs such as Visual Studio for larger projects

VS Code for larger projects when the applicable IDEs are garbage for editing, such as VHDL

>>60825717
>not building a new quantum computer in which to hard-code each text document

cmon you guys

>>60827198
Even they know vscode is superior

Emacs in evil mode for everything that isn't Java. IntelliJ IDEA whenever I have to work with the abomination that is Java.

>>60825717
Emacs

>>60825717
vim

>>60825717
Emacs

>>60825740
OP said text editor, not browser

>>60825717
nano

>>60827647
Emacs is up to two browsers

>>60829381
It has browsers, difference is that you don't need a browser engine to edit text with Emacs, they're just there for what they should be used for, browsing the web. Atom is just a glorified website that you can't open with a normal browser.

Dreamweaver

>>60825717
neovim

File: 1497029243304.jpg (181KB, 1920x1079px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 1920x1079px

>>60825717
Once I make forthmacs using macshax it will be gr8

File: 1484626639520.jpg (561KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

561KB, 1920x1080px

I want something that looks and feels like atom(tree view and syntax highlight) but is written in something quick like c++ and has no bloat. Is such a thing exists?

microsoft word 2007

>>60825717
nano for terminal stuff
sublime for other stuff

>>60829699
gedit

nano because im a scrub but when i get a chance i want to learn vi since its the most minimal

File: india.programmers.visa.pajeet.png (205KB, 661x714px) Image search: [Google]

205KB, 661x714px

nano-tiny because I like to be different

>>60829964
>MANUALLY_INITIATED_CRASH
made me reply

>>60825717
Mcedit

>>60825717
vi

spacemacs

>>60829575
an emacs editor with a forth based core would be awesome

>>60825717
vim

File: dicks.png (27KB, 300x57px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 300x57px

phpstorm

>>60825717
Pen and paper

>>60825805
ny migger

>https://lwn.net/Articles/673724/
I'll stick with vim

ed

>>60825717
nano my nigga

fuck vim fuck emacs they bitch nigga shit

Terminal: Nano
GUI: Pluma

Atom is real nice. Npp for dirty edits, though.

>>60825717
Have you tried kate? It's great because it's not a stupid command line tool for idiots who live in the 80s.