>The i3-6100 is still good, fuck you!!!

I own it. It's not.

>>60814183
I have the low-power T version in my NAS.

File: speccy results 2016-09-09.jpg (219KB, 1280x586px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 1280x586px

I still have a Core i7 3770k. Granted it's overclocked to 4.5 GHz and I have a shitton of RAM, but the only real bottleneck I ever seem to run into is the GPU, which I will probably replace this year. There's obviously no such thing as a future-proof PC but when it comes to CPUs you do not need the latest and greatest for gaming and creativity software.

>>60814183
when my computer comes back from the shop how much will I have fucked up?
The Celeron G550 and its Assrock Mobo died after the 1050 Zotac Mini I bought succ'd it to death so I got an i3 4170 to replace it. Will it be decent enough for a couple of years at 768p and possibly
(1600)1200p down the line?

>>60814183

fuck you i only play casual games

I'm still fine with my i7-930 and i3-2100.

i3 6100 was good for its time though.

best cheap low power consumption i could find.

File: 1493235301264.jpg (22KB, 351x351px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 351x351px

>>60817413
>1066MHz

>>60814183
I use 6100 and it offers more than enough performance

Most demanding game I play is Space Engineers and the game only really utilizies one core. The i3 6100 was perfect at the time I assembled my current gaymen pc, though I wish I had known about the i5 6400t processors you can get sort of cheap on ebay.