Why OS X lack of proper virtualization?

>>60739241
What do you mean? Are you don't like VirtualBox on OSX for some reason?

Have you tried It? It works pretty flawlessly, it's just pointless

macOS works just fine in VirtualBox on a Mac running macOS itself, aside from lacking 3D acceleration.

It's not their fault if virtualization providers like Oracle deliberately provide no support for running an OS elsewhere which is restricted to run on the vendor's devices only. It's not even malevolence, it's just avoiding legal conflict with Apple in the first place.
Googling for the magic commands to emulate a real Mac is your own responsibility.

Winblows have hyper-v and loonix have kvm why isnt a native solution for os x? virtualbox and paralells is 3rd party solutions

>>60739628
Because Apple steals the vast majority of homosex OS code from *BSD.
bhyve is still in its early stages and apple, like the useless fags they are, are probably still trying to figure out how to steal some more code to integrate in the clusterfuck homoxes OS is.

runs fine in Parallels :^)

>>60740238
This, I play games on that shit.

>>60739241

Virtual box works just fine for me

I have also used Parallels, costly but comfy

I use Sierra on my X220 with linux and windows 7 guests on virtualbox. Working damn fine.

>>60739628
>why isnt a native solution for os x

people who seriously want to run virtual machines don't buy macs.