Is this the most significant book of our time? My University

so we need to reject the knowledge held in the book to avoid jewish subversion

File: images.jpg (21KB, 476x693px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 476x693px

>>60714655
No, this book is more rigorous than CLRS

>>60714655
Its a good book overall, but no.

That said this should have full implementation in every language's standard library.

File: cover.jpg (42KB, 830x562px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 830x562px

>>60714655
>most significant
No, this is.

>>60714655
>Also three of the four authors happen to be Jews. Pure coincidence I guess.

Computer Science is *the* Jewish science. Look up all the great theory papers of the last 60 years and your (((echo))) detector will go wild.

File: badgoy.gif (1MB, 294x216px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 294x216px

back to /pol, nerd

>>60714655
>Is this the most significant book of our time?

By counting citations in CS papers? Yes.

File: hanamaru.jpg (151KB, 900x800px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 900x800px

No, SICP is.

>>60714847

Who is the semen canister?

File: SICP_cover.jpg (51KB, 400x579px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 400x579px

>>60714882

(((Hal Abelson)))
(((Gerald Sussman)))
(((Julie Sussman)))

You're proving OP's point. All three are Jewish.

>>60714882
>some deprecated introductory CS book
>_the_ standard reference work for fundamental algorithms
yeah I can see why /g/ gravitates towards the first one

>>60714655
Algorithmic reasoning is for autists and brainlets.

>>60715033
>some deprecated introductory CS book

Do you even (((Scheme))) bro?

>>60714884
>semen canister
Why do I like this wording so much?

>>60715108
I don't use deprecated dialects of deprecated language families.

>>60714655
Drumpf

>>60714655

no the traditional Dijkstranian curriculum embodied in textbooks like that one in CS ignores the majority of issues in computing, one of which being that 90% of graduates will never reuse the methodologies taught in that book