Post your output of the 'lsblk' (with -f flag if you want) command. Also, general storage thread.
Pro tier:
- LVM
- Encryption
- Storage pools
Shit tier:
- Swap files
- Optical drives
- Windows partitions
I'll start:sda
├─sda1 xfs
└─sda2 crypto_LUKS
└─luks-f70e5344-435d-4648-886b-41e941d61e11 LVM2_member
├─centos-swap swap
├─centos-root xfs
└─centos-home xfs
sdb crypto_LUKS
└─cache_drive ext4
sdc crypto_LUKS
└─WXP1H645RL2T zfs_member
sdd crypto_LUKS
└─WX31DA43K309 zfs_member
sde crypto_LUKS
└─WX11DA40H76R zfs_member
sdf crypto_LUKS
└─WX31DA43KV4K zfs_member
Ubuntu laptop normie reporting in. At least I ticked the encrypt box during install.loop0 7:0 0 2G 0 loop
└─cryptswap1 253:0 0 2G 0 crypt [SWAP]
sda 8:0 0 489.1G 0 disk
├─sda1 8:1 0 450M 0 part
├─sda2 8:2 0 100M 0 part /boot/efi
├─sda3 8:3 0 16M 0 part
├─sda4 8:4 0 402.6G 0 part
└─sda5 8:5 0 86G 0 part /
sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:0 0 931.5G 0 disk
└─sda1 8:1 0 931.5G 0 part /Volumes/ExA
>>60712197
>lsblk
'lsblk' is not recognized as an internal or external command, operable program or batch file.
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:0 0 1.8T 0 disk
├─sda1 8:1 0 18.6G 0 part
│ └─md0 9:0 0 18.6G 0 raid1 /
├─sda2 8:2 0 1.9G 0 part [SWAP]
└─sda3 8:3 0 1.8T 0 part
└─sda3 253:3 0 1.8T 0 crypt /mnt/a
sdb 8:16 0 1.8T 0 disk
└─sdb1 8:17 0 1.8T 0 part
└─sdb1 253:0 0 1.8T 0 crypt /mnt/c
sdc 8:32 0 1.8T 0 disk
├─sdc1 8:33 0 18.6G 0 part
│ └─md0 9:0 0 18.6G 0 raid1 /
├─sdc2 8:34 0 1.9G 0 part [SWAP]
└─sdc3 8:35 0 1.8T 0 part
└─sdc3 253:2 0 1.8T 0 crypt /mnt/b
sdd 8:48 0 3.7T 0 disk
└─sdd 253:1 0 3.7T 0 crypt /mnt/d
loop0 7:0 0 41G 0 loop /mnt/d/bookbak/3
loop1 7:1 0 191.8G 0 loop /mnt/d/bookbak/2
The loops are windows ntfs partition dump files, I suppose that's minus points for the luks partitions above?
>>60712843
Wow. Tanya aged badly.
>>60712256
>Encrypted swap, but everything else is plaintext.
NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT
sda
├─sda1 ntfs System Reserved F2366243366208C5
└─sda2 ntfs 888067A08067940A
sdb
├─sdb1 ext4 d0e35ccd-1e50-4b04-ad27-2003610fa35a /
├─sdb2 swap ee53a7d7-71f3-4025-a8b2-2a7f83edbc48 [SWAP]
└─sdb3 ntfs DEC614E4C614BF29
sr0
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
loop0 7:0 0 96M 0 loop
loop1 7:1 0 2G 0 loop
loop2 7:2 0 2G 0 loop
loop3 7:3 0 2G 0 loop /
mmcblk0 179:0 0 14.6G 0 disk
|-mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p3 179:3 0 1M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p4 179:4 0 1M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p5 179:5 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p6 179:6 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p7 179:7 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p8 179:8 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p9 179:9 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p10 179:10 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p11 179:11 0 4K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p12 179:12 0 1.5M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p13 179:13 0 1.5M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p14 179:14 0 1M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p15 179:15 0 1K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p16 179:16 0 8K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p17 179:17 0 10M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p18 179:18 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p19 179:19 0 64M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p20 179:20 0 32K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p21 179:21 0 64M 1 part
|-mmcblk0p22 179:22 0 1.5M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p23 179:23 0 16K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p24 179:24 0 32M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p25 179:25 0 1.5G 0 part
|-mmcblk0p26 179:26 0 32M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p27 179:27 0 64M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p28 179:28 0 32M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p29 179:29 0 150M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p30 179:30 0 512K 0 part
`-mmcblk0p31 179:31 0 12.4G 0 part
mmcblk0rpmb 179:32 0 4M 0 disk
>>60712971
>the more partitions, the more we can pretend its a real computer
Android NAND partitioning scheme.
not gonna bother setting up lvm and a new initramfs when this works just fine
>>60713021
It is a real computer you nigger. I have a full Arch environment on it.
>>60712971
Why so many partitions, senpai?
>>60713036
okay ive set up lvm just for this thread
>>60714506
yay, now you can conveniently resize in real time!
Rate meNAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
sda 8:0 0 298.1G 0 disk
├─sda1 8:1 0 294.1G 0 part /
├─sda2 8:2 0 1K 0 part
└─sda5 8:5 0 4G 0 part [SWAP]
sdb 8:16 0 465.8G 0 disk
└─sdb1 8:17 0 465.8G 0 part /mnt/discoteste
sdc 8:32 0 232.9G 0 disk
└─sdc1 8:33 0 232.9G 0 part
>>60714849
> disco teste
>>60714891
What are you extrapolating from that? Go ahead, I wanna laugh.
>>60712197
mksh: lsblk: not found
also
>shit tier
lincucks