>he doesn't use the two must have of browser extensions

Why would I use NoScript when uBlock and uMatrix together accomplish the same thing but better?

missing requestpolicy

File: Untitled.png (2KB, 57x28px) Image search: [Google]

2KB, 57x28px

>>60711281

>still using noscript when umatrix exists

>>60711387

>use noscript
>visit site
>nothing is working
>check blocked scripts
>there are hundreds
>say fuck it and just temporarily allow all of them
>site is still broken
>a hundred more blocked scripts appear
>allow them as well
>i can finally browse the site

So whats the point of using this shit if i have to allow every script anyways?

inb4 i can allow the select script thats fucking the site up but then i have to spend 5 minutes finding it.

>>60711387
Didn't know about uMatrix. Is it gud?

File: Screen Shot 2017-06-02 at 12.37.08 PM.png (65KB, 524x494px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 524x494px

>>60711420
It's amazing

>>60711420
yes, if you're willing to learn how it works.

>must of
>of
Off yourself. Brainlet normies OUT

>>60711413
>visit shit site
>allow all scripts because you're fucking retarded
>get malware
Top.

>>60711465
dear redditor, they are called normalfags, not 'normies'.

>>60711477
> js
> malware

>>60711500
I bet you run xbap applications off the Internet.

>>60711429
Sorry, that looks too autistic. I like one button to turn my adblock on and off.

>>60711591
>I'm Retarded: The Post

>>60711591
Too complex for you pea brain.

>>60711429
Just install umatrix. What am I in for?
What's the best way to optimise it?

>>60711290
/thread

>>60711413
with umatrix you can whitelist domains, for each site. usually when shit goes wrong, it's just a cdn.

>>60711308
I used to use noscript with requestpolicy, but switched to umatrix and ublock. Do I still need requestpolicy?

>>60712141
if you understood what umatrix and requestpolicy both do, you would know the answer to that

File: trusteer.jpg (7KB, 396x99px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 396x99px

>>60711281
>Not using Trusteer Rapport

You guys seriously turn js completely off? Is there any website working without it?

>>60712204
makes us think

>>60711290
>why would I use NoScript
Becase I do t want to have to go through and configure every website again if I switch to umatrix.

>>60712220
I'll read into NoScript and stuff later. But i mean, almost every library and package for front ent dev today uses it somehow. Isnt every site broken like this?

>>60712204
You can enable individual scripts as necessary to not completely break websites you need.

I use Scriptweeder, don't think there's a uBlock alternative.

>>60712258
Ok, I get it now, you just configure every site you frequent by yourself.
Oh well, makes sense but for me it would be too much bothering.

>>60712273
Most of them suffer some degree of breakage, but access content for news sites and etc isnt usually an issue.

File: umatrix.png (31KB, 524x384px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 524x384px

>>60711429
Here's mine

>>60711281
I stopped using noscript it just broke too many websites and I'm willing to take the risk

>>60712408
>Modern websites breaks when you disable javascript
color me surprised