Google does it again

AD BLOCKER BY GOOGLE -
will block ads even by Google ! source: https://www.theverge.com/2017/6/1/15726778/chrome-ad-blocker-early-2018-announced-google

literally who cares?

everyone interested in blocking ads has already blocking google's ads for years

>>60706057
Thank you, based Google.

It's Embrace, extend, and exterminate.

>>60706190
You forgot to thank based Google.

So google is soduku itself?

>>60706079
/thread

>>60706363
You mean seppuku? jesus fuck you're ignorant... and on a japanese anime forum

Lol, botnet is crumbling, Better Ads Coalition my ass. Even grandmas running ublock now, yet they are trying to act to be in a position to negotiate.

Short alphabet, this ride will get ugly

>>60706382
I meant sudoku, sorry.

>>60706079
content blocking is growing 30% per year

>>60706382
>not knowing seppuku is spelled sudoku on 4chan

Nufag

File: Untitled.png (44KB, 546x451px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 546x451px

>>60706057
idgaf

>>60706190
This, they'll go the AdBlock Plus way.

>>60706057
Dont worry they WILL find a way to monetise you and ad firms

In fact they already know how they are going to do it because is a top (((company))) and dont do half assed decisions

An in browser subscription to get rid of all ads would be a neat idea. Pay once per month to have a fully ad free web experience. The company behind the subscription then pays out each website you do visit.

>>60706723
thats Brave

and build in ad costs to the internet connections, like they did with piracy and data storage. And people think wannacry is ransomware baka flimflamalam

non sequitur

>>60706057
To be fair, how many companies do they have ads with? Didn't dozens drop out after the YouTube controversy.

>>60706059
>early 2018

A little late.

>The company told CNBC that it will allow publishers to participate in a new program called Funding Choices.
>Under the program, when a user with a third-party ad blocker enabled visits a participating site using Chrome,
>they will see a prompt that asks them to either turn off their ad blocker, or "pay for a pass that removes all ads on that site through the new Google Contributor.
>"If they choose to pay the fee, Google will take a 10 percent cut.
>If they select neither choice, they won't be able to view the website.

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/06/01/google-confirms-ad-blocker-coming-to-chrome-in-2018.html

>>60707028

This is how the age of free wild west web dies.

Strangled by googles tentacles, fueled by jewgold.

>>60706057
That's just until they fully develop the ad blocking feature on chrome after a while they'll integrate it with the rest of the google services.

That's just a marketing ploy, ofcourse they'll block ads from google at first if they base it on other adblockers which is the smartest thing to do, THEY CAN'T BUILD ALL THE FEATURES AT ONCE ANYWAY.

Youtube wasn't integrated with google at first and look at it now.

>>60706723
Even IE11 supports the easylist and you moron want to pay.
Some of cretins are really asking for it.

>>60706057
No they wont.
>Google will also work with advertisers to help them “improve ads for consumers” and stop them from “blocking all ads, [which] takes a big toll on the content creators, journalists, web developers and videographers who depend on ads to fund their content creation.”
>Google is also working with advertisers on a “customized message to visitors using an ad blocker, inviting them to either enable ads on their site, or pay for a pass that removes all ads on that site through the new Google Contributor.”

>>60707115
>they're working with advertisers
I see so if they AREN'T WORKING with them that means that they will get blocked.
So only google ads will be shown or ads that "work" with google meaning they need to pay google.

It's good for them since they have 50% or more browser market share.
Now BOW to your botnet master.

>>60707083
on the contrary, these are the cracks on the almighty no-one-should-compete-with Google

File: 1276057884684.png (46KB, 344x517px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 344x517px

>>60706057
Still a botnet

>>60706079
But now even people who aren't interested in blocking ads will get ads blocked for free just by using Chrome.

It's win/win because more shitty ad networks will suffer without people having to actively choose to block ads.

>>60707222

The problem is when jewgle starts to implode it's going to take a lot of the infrastructure with it.

>>60706059
>Instead of an ad “blocker,” Google is referring to the feature as an ad “filter,” according to The Wall Street Journal, since it will still allow ads to be displayed on pages that meet the right requirements. The blocker will work on both desktop and mobile.
So basically they're going to block everything except for google adsense.

>>60709133
you know there are people who don't use their services

T.Y.B.G.