So, now that the dust has settled, what does /g/ think of long-term implications of WannCry and other ransomware?
What's amazing to me is that the ransomware author(s) only managed to extract 55 BTC which is around $122K. That's it. When they're caught, they'll end up in prison for life... for $122K!
Anyway, I think we can all agree that Microsoft suffered the biggest damage from this. They lost a lot of their brand image.
What does /g/ think?
I think fuck the NSA.
>>60668138
Huh? What are you talking about?
>>60668138
>implying the goal wasn't to put BTC in the news again
WannaCry is the only reason why 1 BTC is $2200, so if the criminals were holding a lot of it, they may have made much more than $122k
Literally do not care about garbage like this which will never affect me.
>>60668193
The hacker group has promised monthly releases of similar 0day exploits that can be used for ransomware. It's only a matter of time until shit REALLY hits the fan and BTC shoots even higher.
Nothing will change. It's cheaper to get crippling malware than it is to upgrade the infrastructure.
>>60668193
>bitcoin shills literally have to write ransomware to try to keep cuck bitcoin relevant against alpha ethereum
classic
>>60668489
>implying
CIA will probably assist microsoft in patching the currently-unpatched exploits.
>>60668138
>Anyway, I think we can all agree that Microsoft suffered the biggest damage from this. They lost a lot of their brand image.
Normies have the memory span of skyrim NPC, they already forgot about "le epic haxxor attack", mostly because nobody uses a fucking wincuck computer anymore,
>/g/entlemen are too autistic to fall for this
>Elderly use tablets
>normalfags use their goyphones
>"computer" users usually go for macs
>Only ones left are stupid faggots running servers on windows
>>60668926
You also forget where this was literally nothing. It affected like 2 users of a Windows 7. That was three versions ago.
>>60668138
>Anyway, I think we can all agree that Microsoft suffered the biggest damage from this. They lost a lot of their brand image.
Didn't a few people die in the UK when their socialist hospitals got fucked up?
>>60669448
Does it even matter? It's not like they're white.
>>60668138
>what does /g/ think of long-term implications of WannCry and other ransomware?
Nothing.
>>60669448
>UK hospitals
They were hypothetically already dead.
>>60669448
Link?
>>60668138
>$300
Why? That's fucking idiotic. That's way too fucking high. They should have lowered it, then they'd probably have made way more.
>>60668193
>WannaCry is the only reason why 1 BTC is $2200, so if the criminals were holding a lot of it, they may have made much more than $122k
interesting conspiracy theory. proofs?
Maybe some sysadmins will get their shit upgraded, other than that, probably nothing.
Win7+ users were fine.