which one has less botnet here or is overall better?

File: 18362657_405719893145335_51220694_o.jpg (72KB, 1440x1440px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1440x1440px

>>60664602
>STD
fucking winfags

>>60664602

the ones without STDs

>>60664602
Ltsb if not, enterprise/education

>>60664602
It's pretty much been proven it's all the same.

>>60664602
Enterprise LTSB if you absolutely have to use Windows

>>60664749
seconded

>KMS

>STD
Windows is a disease

lol people willingly install STD

>>60664602
>using a version from some torrent site
Well, you're clearly installing a botnet anyway you go.

File: 1473746373851.jpg (34KB, 500x436px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x436px

>>60664602
>STD

>>60664602
Windows Server 2016

File: mdasdasd.png (141KB, 359x351px) Image search: [Google]

141KB, 359x351px

>>60664602
>even Microsoft confirms windows to be a STD

>>60664602
>Downloads windows 10 crack disc
>thinks for some reason the cracker didnt botnet all of them evenly

The fuck is wrong with Standard Installation?

>>60668501
They intentionally leave out usefull features from the "standard installation".
For example, in windows 7 home editon you completly lack the ability to bridge an ethernet connection. You have to get professional or above to get that "ability" (note, it might be home premium and above, but either way its bullshit)

>>60664602
For domestic use, Enterprise 2016 if you can get a key or don't give a shit about KMS spoofing; otherwise, Professional with a cheap key.