AYYYYYY

DOA.

File: 30030604225l.jpg (37KB, 800x320px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 800x320px

>>60659971

Remember

>>60659971
I'm pretty mad I bought a i7 6700K a year ago.

>>60659971
There's like 8 threads on this shit right now. Come on already.

>>60659971
>6 cores for more than the price of the 8 core R7 1700
>8 cores for more than the 1800X
>10+ core models that will be massively undercut by Threadripper and Epyc
>which won't suffer from major thermal issues because they're soldered
Intel is cruising for a bruising
>IT'S ANNUDAH SHOAH

>>60659971
>Core i7-7820X: 8C/16T, $599
>Core i7-7800x: 6C/12T, $389

these sound nice but feelsbadman that i don't get the i9. 1k is too much for a cpu imotbhfam

>>60660017
>There's like 8 threads on this shit right now.

can you read? there are up to 36 threads now

File: 1483587203666.png (17KB, 328x215px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 328x215px

>>60660033
Alright, you got me there.

>>60659971
suddenly Intel can do this too

File: donald-trump-shrug-1024x551.jpg (101KB, 1024x551px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 1024x551px

2,000$ and i have to delid it?

doa

>>60660024
stop trying to meme you retarded sales person

File: 1476916724958.jpg (20KB, 590x421px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 590x421px

>>60659971
>Core i7-7820X: 8C/16T, $599
>450W TDP
>Core i7-7800x: 6C/12T, $389
>300W TDP

ayyyyyyyyyy

>>60660594
Lol yeah that's stupid as fuck, not regretting building my 1800x rig now

Not to mention the cheapest mobo for Intels new platform is probably gonna be around 300$

>>60660024
>these sound nice

>>60659971
>Core i7-7820X: 8C/16T, $599
the only one im interested in and if you cant OC all 8 cores to at least 4 ghz then its trash.

File: 1495068148387.png (51KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 512x512px

>18 core chip
>Not for servers (delid and no ECC)
>Not for gaming (mediocre clocks and excessive cores)
Is this supposed to be better than Xeons at raw computational performance (i.e. for scientific research and shit)? I'm not familiar with the current Xeon line up, mostly because their naming scheme is fucked up.

>>60660950
not worth it at ALL hahaha

>>60659971
I am retarded, but can you even overclock this? (if you want to burn down some buildings for example)

>>60660967
>thermal jizz
No. Don't even try.

>>60660594
>450W
what the fuck
I though FX 9590 TDP was bad

>>60659971
>Those prices
Is Intel even trying any more?

>>60659971
AMD and Intel are going full retard with all these cores meme cpus.

We don't need more than 6 cores. We've thank amd for pulling this cores bullshit.

http://wccftech.com/intel-skylake-x-core-i9-7920x-7900x-7820x-7800x-x299-leaked/
>>60660594
What? They seem to vary between 140 and 165W

>>60661059
Intel rates TDP at base clocks

>>60661029
Would you tell my VMs that I don't need that many cores?
Maybe they will run faster on my 4 core i7 if they know that more cores are useless.

>>60660952
They're binned rejected Xeons. Their primary purpose is extracting more shekels from dumb goys. The 18 core is going to run at like 2.8 GHz base, lol.

>>60660950
>>60660967
Want to OC? Hope you're ready to DELID your shiny new $600+ CPU.

https://www.overclock3d.net/news/cpu_mainboard/intel_s_skylake-x_and_kaby_lake-x_cpus_will_not_be_soldered/1

>>60660950
1800X at $480 plus a $125 mobo is still a better deal. X299 mobos going to start at $275-$300 for a halfway decent one.

>>60661022
Was they?

>>60661248
>halfway decent one
If you buy anything but the cheapest asus/gigabyte/msi board available you got memed out of your hard earned shekels.

File: notsoldered.jpg (122KB, 1024x536px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 1024x536px

>>60659971
HAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

>>60661302
With the TDP on those things, I wouldn't be surprised if buying a cheap X299 caused some melting sockets and magic smoke to escape.

File: 1495812218308.png (944KB, 1228x1502px) Image search: [Google]

944KB, 1228x1502px

>>60661029
Gas yourself :^)

>>60661302
Lol yeah i bet those rgb lights, free more sata and USB ports are worth it.

Not to mention the fact that msi is probably the best when it comes to memory support

>>60661173
>uses vms
You're just autistic.

>>60661029
Yes, I know. Do these stupid goyim not understand that the human eye can't feel more than 4 cores!?!?!?!?

File: anime_brian_krzanich_placates_th.png (660KB, 698x840px) Image search: [Google]

660KB, 698x840px

>>60661222
Don't forge the liquid cooling!

http://www.tomshardware.com/news/intel-x-series-skylake-x-kaby-lake-x-x299-basin-falls-core-i9,34545.html

>The LGA2066 socket is compatible with LGA2011 cooling solutions, which is a plus. However, Intel now recommends water cooling as the minimum cooling option, which will add more cost to the overall solution.


>However, Intel now recommends water cooling as the minimum cooling option,
>minimum cooling option
>minimum


Looking real Bulldozer there, Intel

>>60661302
>>60661341
Never mind i misread that, fuck I'm tired

File: intel ceo JUST.jpg (119KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 1000x1000px

>>60661350
>buy this expensive liquid cooling setup to make up for the solder we skimped out on!

>>60661342
Newsflash guys, virtual machines are of no use and in fact autistic.

>>60661350
They'd mean custom loops as well. Not some hackenstien AIO mount.
Bubble bubble, boil and trouble.
>explodingwaterheater.gif

File: oOXDJDU.jpg (181KB, 358x500px) Image search: [Google]

181KB, 358x500px

>>60661396
>Intel right now

>>60661022
They don't need to try if your only competition is eating crayons on the corner.

File: AMD-EPYC-CPU-740x416.jpg (26KB, 740x416px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 740x416px

>>60661550
Well they better start trying, because this sure as hell isn't a "eating crayons in the corner" effort.

File: 1485294233709.jpg (1MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3840x2160px

>>60661550

File: nipples.jpg (20KB, 111x211px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 111x211px

>>60661385
>virtual machines are of no use

File: Intel-Core-X-CPU-Skylake-X-and-Kaby-Lake-X-X299-HEDT-Platform-Launch_Coolers[1].jpg (607KB, 4000x2250px) Image search: [Google]

607KB, 4000x2250px

>>60661396
They are selling $100 Intel branded AIOs.

>>60659971
>Core i9-7980XE: 18C/36T, $1,999
>Core i9-7960X: 16C/32T, $1,699
>Core i9-7940X: 14C/28T, $1,399
>Core i9-7920X: 12C/24T, $1,199
>Core i9-7900X: 10C/20T, $999
^
+$400 / 2 cores
>Core i7-7820X: 8C/16T, $599 <-- These have
>Core i7-7800x: 6C/12T, $389 <-- competition

The jewry knows no bounds

>>60660011
This

Nice tripple dubs btw

File: 1337031544649.jpg (34KB, 288x499px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 288x499px

>for a great VR experience

>>60660594
>Core i7-7820X: 8C/16T, $599
>450W TDP
Wrong. It's 140W
>Core i7-7800x: 6C/12T, $389
>300W TDP
Wrong. It's also 140W

>18 core cpu
>actually has 19 cores
>1 additional core you can't disable and can't modify

What's going on here?

>>60661677
The current 10c/20t cpu is like $1600. A big drop.

Then again the people who buys the 6950X probably shits out money.

>>60661677
All of them have competition, dude. AMD is revealing more details on Threadripper within a few hours.

So can I throw my GPU in the trash when I get my hand on all these cores?

>>60661677
Are you retarded? The 7820X is $700 cheaper than the equivalent 6950X at launch. They replace a 10C CPU with a 16C one at the same price point. This is a massive price cut whether you like Intel or not.

>>60661741

Its the other way around - GPGPU is a future Intel is very worried about.

>>60661758
>GPGPU
Shit for anything but basic number crunching.

>>60661769

Right now it is, the thing is GPGPU is working towards being good enough to eliminate the need for what you could call desktop class cpus.

>>60661758
This, I think Intel is actually more worried about competition from Nvidia than AMD.

>>60661746
It's still gimped in comparison though, isn't it?

>>60659971
why pay 400 for 6core, when you can pay 230?

>>60661782
>the thing is GPGPU is working towards
ML memes.

>>60661805
So that you actually get a quality product and not bulldozer 2.0

>>60661825
but it all tested and it works fine 1600 is best buy right now for normal home use/gaming

File: 1494052174535.png (2MB, 973x6115px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 973x6115px

>>60661836

The 1600 is anamazing chip.

>>60661836
And intel will easily take at least 4.4Ghz, just like 6800 does. Probably even better, since it is an update.

File: 14958486810732.jpg (55KB, 500x437px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 500x437px

Soon memes will not be memes anymore with that fire hazard being released.

File: 1496160101122.png (261KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

261KB, 1280x720px

>>60661854
lmao that 6 core is not getting anywhere close to 4.4 GHz on all cores. Not without a delid job and watercooling.

>Tfw their is a chance that AMD will drop their prices even more

200€ 1600X when?

>>60661875
>IT CAN'T BE
Cause 90% of 6800 didn't, right?

>>60661877
Never, AMD wants these margins.

>>60661825
>bulldozer 2.0
Zen is not Bulldozer. Ryzen is not FX. IPC between Ryzen and Kaby Lake are near identical.

http://www.zolkorn.com/en/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-vs-intel-core-i7-7700k-mhz-by-mhz-core-by-core-en/view-all/

>>60659971
>pic shows i5 X
>doesn't post prixes or specs
WHat about the i5 X series?

>>60661854
the fact is 1600 easily does 100fps in any game is mostly gpu bound, intel might have like 10% do to the fact amd cores are glued together, but paying more than double for 10% more? Are you serious? (remember x299 cost like 2x more atleast than am4)

>>60661888
6800K was soldered, for one thing. 4.4 GHz is silicon lottery tier even on there. 4.2 GHz much more typical.
>>60661908
>buying a 4c/4t for a HEDT platform
lel.
>>60661920
He's a fanboy, what did you expect?

>>60661890
didnt they commented they are getting like 80%+ die success, thats indication they might drop prices once threadripper is officially on sale

>>60661187
>They're binned rejected Xeons
i dont think so, unless intel is taking their new cache layout into Xeon waters

>>60661937
We'll see how that goes once more about Threadripper is revealed in a couple of hours.

>>60661934
I thought the i5 X series was 4c/8t

File: wGzegMV.png (252KB, 723x890px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 723x890px

>>60661825
LMAO go away you bootyblasted shekelchaser

>>60661961
see
>>60661875

It's 4c/4t.

>>60661961
they planned to call it i7 4/4, but literally got called out on it by everyone once it got leaked and rebranded it back to i5

>>60661961
There's only one i5-x and it's 4c/4t. The other "Kaby Lake X" s the i7-7740X which is 4c/8t.

>>60659971
I think the really funny part is they don't support ECC

Whats stopping AMD from releasing 32core threadripper? the socket is literally the same as there epyc line

File: good goy.png (604KB, 800x523px) Image search: [Google]

604KB, 800x523px

>>60662007
>buy xeons if you want that, goy

>>60662032
>intel releases 18core monster for 2k
>amd drops the hammer and releases 32core for 2k
Intel would literally be done

>>60661875
4 cores?
What the fuck?
I hate intel now.

File: 1481996232699.gif (387KB, 382x379px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 382x379px

>>60659971
>140w
>160w

>>60662007
Threadripper fully supports ECC which is even more funny.

>>60661664
>propelyne glycol

vape lyfe

>>60659971
Hmm if I had to spend more money I guess either i7 7820X or 7900X would be my choices but I don't need to worry about intel CPUs for a long long time. Don't see why /g/ need this many threads about the pricing, performance, and news updates. Anyways not my problem to worry about this thread is mostly for users who are gonna have to worry about this stuff now.

>>60662069

Ryzen supports ECC but no AM4 motherboard validates any ECC kit.

>>60662073
are you retarded its discussion board about technology obviously there will be many threads discussing cpu wars that will finally start after 10years of hiatus

>>60662090
But TR4 mobos are supposed to be validated for ECC.

>>60661875
Is there a column for this chart to show which processors have to be delidded?

>>60662095

They will be - my main point is ryzen isn't cut down in any real way compared to what we know of threadripper. If someone made an ECC supporting AM4 board tomorrow you could make some rather cheap and relatively potent mini servers. IIRC Intel actively disables ECC support on their mainstream sockets.

So what sort of computer work would I be doing that would warrant one of these processors?

>>60662062
>However, Intel now recommends water cooling as the minimum cooling option, which will add more cost to the overall solution.

File: alljizzed.png (42KB, 1039x311px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 1039x311px

>>60662120
All of them. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCv7hF7kepU

>>60661698
It's the gimp core

File: time to delid.png (327KB, 1508x720px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 1508x720px

>>60662120
>>60662157

>>60662136
3D rendering, high end video encoding, compiling, etc.

Anything that requires a massive parallel workload or heavy separate workloads at the same time.

>>60661698
NSA core mah mayne

>>60661698
It's the NSA backdoor.

Not joking or being ironic.

>>60662190

Anything massively parallel is gpu territory.

>>60662182
kek. saved.

We are living in the housefire era? Yay or Nay?

>>60662157
They won't spare a nickel for solder but I need to put a $200 watercooler on it to keep my house from burning down?

>>60662182
>6/12 slowest of them all
>same TDP as 8/16
>8/16 costs twice of 6/12
just in case you were insterested in mainstream 6/12 let fuck it up

>>60662216
Yup. Get used to it goy, it's the Intel way.

File: 5646490+_6544bb4a7aae771ecdff9e559b084bf2.jpg (14KB, 441x411px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 441x411px

So can we agree that Intel just publicly took a shit on the face of everyone who bought a 6900K? lul

>>60662217

Don't forget the gimped ram support.

>>60659971
DELID THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

File: hedtlol.png (67KB, 1585x559px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 1585x559px

>>60662216
Or you could just get, Threadripper which is AMD's HEDT platform. 16 cores @ 3.6 GHz, lower TDP than Intel. It's gonna be pretty nice. Zen scales amazingly well.
>>60662233
Yes .. all 10 of them.

>>60662235
Oh shit you are right. They cannot be more obvious with making it shit on purpose.

File: 1496109703711.png (2MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1200px

Delid this

>>60662136
Getting that #1 spot on 3DMark. There are people who bought 4 Titan XPs just for this.

guys I'm not too good in hardware
are intel raped amd or wot?

>not having INT_MAX+1 cores
>not having LONG_MAX+1 threads
into the trash it goes

>>60662277
Other way around. Especially when it comes to architecture scaling. Intel's ringbus garbage can't scale for shit. AMD's Zen is designed from the ground up to scale.

>>60662277
intel was always better than amd.

>tfw own a soldered 8C/16T cpu

Feels good

>>60662292
t.butthurt shilltel fanboy

>>60660011
>$300 6700k a year ago
>cheaper mobo as well

Why are you mad exactly? Seems like it has served its purpose for the year at least. What do you need more cores for suddenly?

>>60662292
DELID THIS

>>60659971
>Core i7-7820X: 8C/16T, $599
>Core i7-7800x: 6C/12T, $389
How exactly is this supposed to compete with the 1800X or the 1600X?

>>60662313
>>60662331
if intel is worse than amd, why does the united states military standardize on intel chips?

every missle we make, every smart bomb, every guidance system is literally intel inside.

>>60662344
>rad-hardened 286 inside

I'm convinced. Get me a retro PC, stat!

File: who.gif (10KB, 600x694px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 600x694px

>>60662344
guess who tells you to build this bombs?

>>60662291
what do you mean with "scale" ? .-.

>>60662375
Oy vey the goyin know.

>>60662389
Basically, the more cores Intel adds, the lower the clockspeed and higher the TDP, cooling becomes a big issue, and the yields suck.

The more cores AMD adds, the clockspeeds stays basically the same, the TDP scales linearly, cooling isn't as much of an issue, and the yields remain very high (80%+)

>>60662389

MOAR BINGBUS. Basically AMD has a far superior fabric which makes their MCM approach considerably morre viable than bolting more and more cores onto a single die and praying yields aren't anything other than horrendous.

>>60662344
The new military bombs constist of undelided i9's.

Product segmentation to the max. I bet almost all Jewtel customers will rather buy Skylake-SP for HEDT usage than this shit.

> But Skylake-SP is server chip

Who cares? There will 100% sure be some nice ATX boards for Skylake-SP.

>But Skylake-SP SKU's will be more expensive

No, the price is going to be almost the same.

Skylake-X is just for stupid gaymers.

File: 1S assravager.jpg (321KB, 1128x1051px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 1128x1051px

>>60662467
No. They will buy this.

>>60662477
da faq is this meme motherboard?

>>60662493
It's 1S EPYC board prototype.

>>60661687
Was waiting for somebody to notice this. That pitch makes no sense.

>>60662463
>The new military bombs constist of undelided i9's.
every explosion needs an initiator

>>60662477
I said "Jewtel" customers aka those fuckers/OEM's who get chips basically for free. For all the others, Naples is (likely) the best solution.

OK, maybe some HFT guys will prefer higher singe-core performance where Skylake-SP might have advantage due to higher clocks.

>>60662344
Because Intel is a 'murrican company.

Don't delude yourself. Those bombs would perform as good (or bad, depending if you fired or received them) with an AMD Snapdragon or Allwinner chip. They were using CPUs in the 80s to do those calculations.

>>60662598
>due to higher clocks.
Im-fucking-possible.

>>60662341
>True monolithic high frequency cores
vs.
>2 CPUs glued together with an interconnected shitfest that requires you to be lucky that your application is specially optimized for your snowflake architecture
I'll take the real thing any day

>>60662606
>Because Intel is a 'murrican company.
so is AMD

File: 1489510222325.png (1MB, 1361x810px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1361x810px

>>60662620
You earned it, bro.

File: LRM_EXPORT_20170516_205055.jpg (352KB, 398x837px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 398x837px

>>60662620
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHA

>>60662620
140+TDP monolithic

File: 106f9bc0f474e0d201dc7fc4bc344a9e.jpg (293KB, 1250x1429px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 1250x1429px

>>60660011
I went from a core2duo to a 6700k
I am incredibly happy save for the (although allegedly inert because no remote IP management) botnet features

upgrading from my nvidia 950 when I feel the need to, probably late volta or early gen after that, when I have learned enough to make use of gpu processing for other stuff than shitty casual games

>>60660594
>>Core i7-7820X: 8C/16T, $599
>>450W TDP
Jesus fuck the the r7 1700 is only like $329 and it's 65w tdp

>>60662620
>>>True monolithic high frequency cores
add more bingbus!!! :DDDD

>>60662620
this
fuck half-assed ayymdpoojet garbage

>>60662620
>True monolithic high frequency cores
Rrrrrright who the fuck needs scalable coherent interconnects. MAKE MORE BINGBUS :---DDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

>>60662615
>Skylake-SP with:
>4C/8T
>4.5 GHz
>180W TDP

Possible? Yes. Likely? Don't know. But the HFT fags would love that.

>>60661664
That shit is worth 60$ at most

File: Intel_Antitrust_Wide.png (223KB, 760x427px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 760x427px

>>60662697
I'd incline to agree with you .. for the right price.

File: IDs0Woh.gif (122KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 250x250px

>>60660952
There is a market called "high end/performance workstation". Rendering, compiling, 3D modeling, etc.

>>60662217
there is a mainstream 6/12 already on the market and you can get for something like 200?

>>60662389
basically amd glues its cpus together to make 1 big cpu, because of this it can scale large number of cores without increase in heat, basically heat remains the same since amd just glues extra cpu and same thing with mhz. Intel has 1 big cpu and more cores it adds, more heat it generates and lower the mhz it gets or its uses insane amount of W and generates insane amount of heat.

File: 1373025886404.jpg (29KB, 365x512px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 365x512px

>>60661875
>actually releasing an i5 4c/4t for enthusiast boards
>as well as and 4C/8T i7 for almost $100 more
what the fuck is this, jewtel?

also this
>recommended water cooling as minimum
we've reached the peak of jewry

File: AHAHAHAHHA.png (3MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1920x1080px

>>60662697
LOL

>>60662344
intel is owned by jews and usa goverment is owned by jews, so you put 2 + 2 together and you get answer good goy

File: 1fx2km.jpg (76KB, 888x499px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 888x499px

>>60662620
>>60662697
>MOAR COARZ!
>MOAR BINGBUS!
>MOAR NIGGAHURTZ!
>MOAR JIGGAWATZ!
>MOAR TDP!

>>60662852
>>recommended water cooling as minimum
Didn't the FX-9000 CPU's recommend water cooling too?

>>60662902
Yea.

>>60662902
I don't think so, but they didn't ship the CPU with a stock cooler, implying for the consumer to buy an aftermarket one.
but there were like only two FX9000s anyway, complete flops. Noone in their right mind bought that abomination.

>>60662902
and it was piece of trash? So i guess we have made 180, intel is fucked once amd releases zen2 on 7nm, its gg game over

File: 6ee.jpg (52KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 600x600px

>>60661698
>What's going on here?
I wouldn't worry about it too much goy.

>>60660018
>IT'S ANNUDAH SHOAH
I hope so. I can't wait.

>>60659971
I bought a 7700k 2 months ago :(

>>60661350
I kekd
We fx9k now

Intel's solution was moar cores and moar jiggawatts

File: 1463656994019.jpg (101KB, 500x501px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 500x501px

>>60661417
I lol'd

It's liked amd and Intel switched places. It's bulldozer 2 electric bugaloo

>>60659971
pefect cooling solution for i9
http://www.sweclockers.com/galleri/13375-husradiator-till-vattenkyld-prestanda-pc

File: single socket holocaust.jpg (28KB, 550x550px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 550x550px

>>60663167
You mean NetBurst: Return of the King?

>>60663202
GEG, moar bibeline bls

>>60660003
Really, it wasn't just shitposting.
Oh fucking wow.

I could understand for the small dies, but look at that motherfucking die - it could handle solder.
Fuck You intel.

>>60663291
>it could handle solder.
ANYTHING could handle solder, even 113mm^2 Clarksdale 2cores. :^)

>the 6c/12t is only 100$ pricier than ryzen plus a more exp- i mean more feature rich- motherboard
lmao shintel housefires

>>60663312
You forgot Intel™ TIM™ Jizz™ for Genuine Delidding Expirience.

>>60663312
Lmao they gimped the lanes on the 6 and 8 cores, though.

>>60663305
I guess this is how Intel solves the problem of Sandy Bridge for the future, use shit thermal paste under the lid so CPUs really do go bad after 3-4 years.

Thanks a fucking truckload Intel.

>>60662244
Kek
>>60662277
Intel is feeling the heat from amd (and their r&d lab kek)

Intel's pricing is literally fuck you. Their fanboys are so retarded they'll accept this blatant price gouging. A 4 thread i7 is unacceptable in this day & age.

>>60663339
You're welcome. Now pay up, goy. That jizz TIM isn't gonna replace itself.

>>60663337
Out of all the things to criticize on these PoSs why do so many people use the lanes?

Wasn't it proven that even pascal cards can barely saturate PCIe2.0 x8? Who even uses SLI anymore lol Waste of money just like these overpriced panic reactions to Ryzen

>>60663366
Most hilarious part is that AMD with their peanuts R&D budget constanly delivers fucking innovation: from fucking X86-64 to new memory types.

>>60663366
4930K to Ryzen9 soon here.
I was on the fence on X299 or X390 - This thread made my mind up.

File: 1370868270595.jpg (149KB, 700x398px) Image search: [Google]

149KB, 700x398px

>>60659971
>DelidHEDTGate

>>60663415
Just wait, Intel is gonna have issues with 10nm.
So we'll see a refresh series.

With soldered TIM. 4790K redux.

>>60663452
When? After 7nm Zen2?

>>60663452
>soldered TIM

>soldered
>TIM
Please pick one. My autism is poking me.

According to various gaming benchmarks the i7 7700k still outperforms the Ryzen 7 1700X. Wouldn't that mean that for gaming the new I7's and I9's will definitely beat the Ryzen's in gaming. There are already some games that will get their framerate bottlenecked by an 7700k so if it was for gaming would Ryzen ever be a good option because the Ryzen 7 1700X costs as much as the i7-7700K. I understand Ryzen may be better in tasks that heavily make use of multithreading but except for video editing I can't seem to think of any other ways to use it as a consumer.

File: global nuclear annihilation.jpg (690KB, 1081x1447px) Image search: [Google]

690KB, 1081x1447px

>>60663202
not so fast

>>60663392
Yeah, it's amazing what they have come up with on a peanuts budget. I'm actually excited about cpus again. Feels good that amd can go toe to toe with Intel all while offering a way better price.
>>60663408
We live in a great time to build a new pc.

Their infinity fabric seems to work well with their zen core of they can basically jam two cpus together with epyc. All while being reasonable in heat and power consumption. I think Intel was caught off guard

>>60660950
They turbo beyond 4G so I'd imagine with proper cooling and delid it'll be a breeze.

>>60663510
>According to various gaming benchmarks the i7 7700k still outperforms the Ryzen 7 1700X
Not in RoTR anymore lmao.

>>60663533
Eeuh yes it does

>>60663549
Lmao no they patched it like several hours ago.

>>60663474
solder is still a TIM.

File: nise-river-spirit-nami-by-dniseb.jpg (465KB, 1201x2013px) Image search: [Google]

465KB, 1201x2013px

>>60663392
clearly intel isnt failing because it isnt spending enough on feminism.
i bet if the company had more women, they would have new ideas!
they should drop antoher 300million on women in tech initiatives.

>>60663604
Now the most hilarious part ever: AMD's CEO is a woman.

File: 1441953259232.jpg (63KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 600x600px

>28 PCI lanes

holy shit intel is panicking

>>60663604
Intel is going to need to spend half its net payroll on women for feminism. It's only fair, right?

File: 1495652190059.jpg (47KB, 720x713px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 720x713px

>>60663623
see?!
amd do good
amd has woman
therefore having woman makes do good

flawless logic!

>>60663510
We're talking about HEDT CPUs here, not gaymen, though, ironically, AMD's Threadripper CPUs might have better gaymen performance than the already released Ryzen's IF they have the faster infinity fabric of EPYC.

>>60663639
That's... the same number of lanes in low-end Broadwell-E. Literally nothing changed.

Whoops, I mean:
>IDS HABBENING!!!

>>60663604
>>60663653
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOIhX2vuTGY

>>60663559
Looks like Intel's check cleared.
>>60663639
Intel is panicking but moar pci lanes isn't their tell.
>>60663672
When is thread ripper being released? I can't wait to see its performance.

>>60663690

was broadwell-e marketed as a gaymer chip?

you cant SLI/crossfire with anything that costs less than 1000 bucks from intel

File: euGQ16A.png (394KB, 603x632px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 603x632px

>>60663665
>Pornhub
Let's be real here, has anyone ever intentionally visited Pornhub? I'm sure most of their traffic is 13 year olds Googling "internet porn".

File: hahah.png (265KB, 366x440px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 366x440px

>>60663653
>>60663707
>a tech companies ability to compete is based entirely on its ability to employ enlightenment philosophy
>intel begins starts to adopt counter enlightenment continental philosophy
>begins to fail miserably

its almost as if, meritocracy is successful for a reason.

File: humongous.png (222KB, 647x343px) Image search: [Google]

222KB, 647x343px

It's that time again.

Intel's diverse marketing team will have their hands full to find ways to bribe- I mean, persuade- their customers- I mean, clients- to devote to Intel. Just like the good old days of Pentium 4. Except they were less diverse back then.

>>60663604
>>60663653
>>60663776
Sad but true

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA7X6emZLTA

So they're overpriced Xeons with autism? Does the X stand for Xeon? Do the goyim know about this?

>>60663750
>When is thread ripper being released?
In ~5 hours.

File: 1404778006209.gif (154KB, 423x316px) Image search: [Google]

154KB, 423x316px

>>60659971
>Core i7-7800X = 28 PCIe lanes
>AMD Threadripper = 64 PCIe lanes

gg intel

File: Intel-Broadwell-E_Feature-List.jpg (95KB, 960x540px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 960x540px

>>60663752
>was broadwell-e marketed as a gaymer chip?
I dunno bro. You tell me.
>you cant SLI/crossfire with anything that costs less than 1000 bucks from intel
Uh, the Z270 splits lanes exactly like the X370.

Your comments got dumber, if that's even possible. At a certain point in life, you cut your losses and hang yourself. If you haven't crossed that boundary, you're rapidly approaching it.

>>60663858
Nice!

>>60662641
>>60662641
:'D

>>60663388
>Wasn't it proven that even pascal cards can barely saturate PCIe2.0 x8?
No, because it's incorrect.

>>60663752
>you cant SLI/crossfire with anything that costs less than 1000 bucks from intel
Yeah, you can, even on their mainstream shit.

>>60662062
its okay when intel does it

>>60663949
cache is not only about capacity, retard

>>60659971
>Core i7-7820X: 8C/16T, $599
Aaaand they fucked up. AMD won, it's over. Fuck yourself Intel kikes, you had the chance to not mess this up but you did.

>>60664052
It's not even soldered, anon.

I think I'll celebrate Intel's new lineup by buying another 1700.

Delid dis thread

>>60664064
Who cares anon. They could have priced it at 400 bucks and nobody would have said a thing. But pricing it 250 bucks over what AMD has to offer with probably just minimal performance gains is pure kikery.

>>60660011
Shit so did I but I'm going to shoot for the 7920X

File: 1491166649444.jpg (66KB, 568x612px) Image search: [Google]

66KB, 568x612px

>Core i9-7980XE: 18C/36T
>18 fucking cores
>36 fucking threads

And they're not AMD cores so they're actually meaningful.

AMD will never recover

>>60664149
You can buy 10 complete FX-8320e machines for the price of that.

>>60664041
>>60663949
to be fair, larger non-shared caches per core has got to be a pain in the ass for cache coherence implementation, execution must keep going during it

File: d98.jpg (28KB, 600x640px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 600x640px

>>60664149

>>60661029
What is Xeon ? You're probably one of those punk bitches who thinks 8GB RAM is all you need and 16GB is a meme.

>>60664110
did you expect someting else from jewtel?

>>60664110
If you look at it that way the 1800X is priced $150 over what AMD has to offer. Looking at base clock, that's probably the chip you should be comparing the 7820X to.

>>60664149
And it's still more expensive than 32-core Ryzen will be. Intel has worse core # and IPC.

File: int.jpg (185KB, 778x960px) Image search: [Google]

185KB, 778x960px

What the fuck happened lads

>>60659971
I guess Core i9 + Nvidia TITAN + 16 GiB of memory is the official autistic build of /g/

File: 1471476523613.jpg (85KB, 523x355px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 523x355px

>>60664149

>>60664209
Yes, I would have expected some decency and respect for AMD. I truly thought better of them, guess I was wrong.
>>60664235
The problem is that Intel has no other 8 core option and most people will buy the 1700 anyway.

>>60664052
And only 28 PCIe lanes too, while the Broadlel $600 price point wasn't so castrated.

File: 1346099729146.jpg (8KB, 175x175px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 175x175px

>>60664237
And worse SMT. All they have going for them is dem MHz.

>>60664041

Intel is a memory company masquerading as a chip designer.

File: 1491875849697.png (84KB, 653x726px) Image search: [Google]

84KB, 653x726px

>>60664149
I can't wait to see your face when Intel confirms the 2.8ghz base clocks of that abortion and AMD announces 16c/32t Threadripper at 3.6/4.0ghz

>>60664293
>memory company
If only. Their only original memory design is Optane and it's a fucking failure. Compared to AMD:
>GDDR3(ATi)/5, HBM
that actually work.

>>60664276
>Intel has no other 8 core option
I know. The 7820X is the chip in this new lineup that I have the most hopes for. All the many core crazyness seems rushed and like a panicked response. But I hope Intel didn't sleep so much in class that this CPU is also that.

>>60659971
>X
>VR
>Core i(n+2)

More meaningless buzzwords please Intel, I'm this close to cumming.

>>60664316

>If only.

Think smaller - their L1 and L2 cache designs are stupidly good and nobody can match it.

>>60664149
Ryzen cores are real cores dumbfuck

File: .png (6KB, 568x238px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 568x238px

With the pricing comparison to previous deals it seems like they'll probably give us Intel shills the 7820X for the same price. Not sure if it would make sense to sell it and get a Threadripper instead. At least we'll know after AMD's keynote tonight.

>>60664322
>All the many core crazyness seems rushed and like a panicked response
Yeah, those chips seem like rebranded xeons to me. Benchmarks will tell, hopefully there is at least some reasoning behind the price.

>>60664351
>L2
HOL UP. Zen's L2 is better. Their L1 is godsent though.

File: 1359910388735.gif (444KB, 332x331px) Image search: [Google]

444KB, 332x331px

this is just server grade processors repackaged for suckers who totally need 16 fucking cores

File: amd.jpg (63KB, 800x208px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 800x208px

>>60664237
>typical AMDrone coremind

Listen, dumbass, the number of AMD cores means jack shit when their 8C/16T flagship gets BTFO by some old overclocked i7.

>>60664237
I don't know how much a 32-core Epyc CPU will be, but given that it's not available outside of the server market, it's idle speculation.
>worse IPC
I can only assume this is the rumor that doesn't leave the echo chamber.

>>60664398
Why are you even in a HEDT thread if you don't care about cores? Oh, right, you're a retarded /v/ dicklicker that only cares about muh clocks 4 cores.

>>60664398
>btfo
>see
>>60664248
>>60664183

File: Twice the threads, twice the shitposting powa.png (41KB, 919x677px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 919x677px

>>60664390

>>60664398

check out the new ryzen tomb raider benchmarks

a few tweaks and you get an extra 30-40% FPS

File: 1487730850625.jpg (20KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 480x360px

>>60664398
>>60664149
>got ripped off $1000 for some bitchlake CPU
>sees THESE intel i9 specs
>pulls down trousers 1 year early in anticipation of kike dick
you cucks are too much xD

>>60664421
that's a 8 core CPU, and you still have only 9% utilization on whatever you are running right now

File: my sides.png (173KB, 640x400px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 640x400px

>>60663528
>actually recommending DELID

>>60664421
That's only 8 cores, you might actually come close to utilizing all of them once a month or something.

>>60664462
What's wrong with delidding if you don't fuck it up?

>>60663520
And yet the expensivest I9 with 18 cores will have a core speed of 2 ghz or something.Wouldn't be surprised if it were 1.8 lol.Fucking bricked Xeons

File: 1481744513695.png (349KB, 716x2588px) Image search: [Google]

349KB, 716x2588px

>>60664398
LMAO

>>60664240

This is the only thing they can do now.
Clockspeeds have hit a wall, just like the entire process of making things smaller.
Until we get an entirely new material to make CPUs out of, or until we move to photonic CPUs or something, we're going to keep on seeing moar cores to improve the performance.
Well at least the companies out there will have to start focusing on proper multicore support from now on.

>>60664322
>panicked response
Panicked to what exactly? They don't really make multi year multi billion dollar investments in a knee jerk fashion.

It's really the only logical way to go. Moar gigahertz wasn't going to pay off forever.

>>60664491
It's rumored to have 2.7ghz base clock.

>>60664483
Your warranty and the chance of fucking up.

>>60659971
Meanwhile I'm still rocking my 2600k, pretty happy with it

>>60664483
Intel shouldn't jew out on soldering. It's just cost cutting that the consumer has to pay. Sure you can delid, but you're also voiding your warranty at the same time and that is unacceptable for a newly bought chip.

>>60664483
The fact that you have to do it in the first place?
The fact that you have to do it because Intel are a bunch of cheap-asses?
The fact that if you do fuck it up, your shiny new $600+ CPU is now a drink coaster?

Apparently it is way harder to delid these new i9's, watch the video from the guy shucking the delid tool. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cCv7hF7kepU

>>60664365
>hopefully there is at least some reasoning behind the price.
AHAHAHA this is Intel we're talking about. It's price gouging. That's their reasoning.

File: Core_i666.png (2MB, 1920x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1200px

>>60664522
But it's hilarious that they did!

File: images.jpg (11KB, 309x163px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 309x163px

>>60664529

>>60664506
>Panicked to what exactly?
SKL-X is like half a year too early, anon. Same with Coffee Lake.

>>60659971
Oy vey someone needs to pay for Intel diversity programs and that someone is you


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XA7X6emZLTA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_QzPj1wuWc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOIhX2vuTGY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xwZqXGdzHw

>>60664529
>all those bits in the way

Looks like Intel is working on it. To stop the delidding, I mean. ;^)

>>60664507
2. something ghz on a GAYming cpu in 2017.
=]]]]]] Wtf why did intel succumb to the old Amd ways.And they actually incurage Deliding like nigga just put better jizz in there.

>>60662780
And the same market greatly benefits from features like ECC.

>>60664627
Features that Threadripper has.

>>60664585
>all those bits in the way
Yeah, pretty much. It looks much more difficult to delid without a tool and even that's possible to fuck it up if you put it in the wrong way. Nobody should have to put up with this shit in 2017, especially on a "premium" product.

When will intel stop using using toothpaste as their termal paste?When they get out the i11 with 36/72 or when they finally achieve 7nm?

>>60664656
>i11 with 36/72
Never because 1.7% yields/

>>60664483
>buy 2000$ CPU
>have to reapply thermal paste yourself and void your warranty so that you don't burn to death

File: toothpaste inside.jpg (31KB, 630x372px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 630x372px

>>60664656
Never. Toothpaste forever!

>>60664676
Like if it was toothpaste with petroleum jelly but no you gotta Jew until the last penny.

>>60664670
Heat isn't even an issue anymore since CPU's will just throttle if they get too hot. The problem is that it's just wasted performance.

>>60659971
>still not soldered

>>60664648
AMD HEDT supports ECC in a way that doesn't rely on board partners to implement it?

>>60664744
Board partners validated their boards for ECC.

File: i7930.jpg (43KB, 328x241px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 328x241px

>>60660011
I'm pretty mad I bought a i7 930 seven years ago.

>>60659971
>Core i9-7980XE: 18C/36T, $1,999

INTEL INSIDE
KIDNEY OUTSIDE

File: 1483586224021.webm (1MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1280x720px

>>60664208
>not having 128gb of ram

>>60664744
Better than not supporting it at all.

>>60664755
>3.5
Oh, Linux. AMD had no drivers back then.

>>60662620
>>True monolithic high frequency cores
Wasn't this the exact same argument of AMD Fanboys back in the Phenom days?

>A-At l-least it's a real q-quadcore n-not two glued d-dualcores
>let's ignore the fact that it was just a terrible processor at its time.

>>60664515
I'd probably lump warranty in the same category as "fucking it up".

>>60664522
>>60664529
To be clear, my post was in response to RECOMMENDING delidding as something that can benefit you, not that it isn't fucking stupid that you have to do it.

File: IMG_7114.jpg (175KB, 414x615px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 414x615px

>>60661825
Well good luck with having to take more dick for cash in order to buy your new chip from jewtel lol.
:3

>>60664398
Only benchmarks showing the 7700k besting the 1800x and day 1 Intel famboys have saved to their fap folder

>>60659971
>18 cores
>36 threads
I haven't really followed CPU tech lately but why the fuck would you need that many cores? Are the single core processing speeds atleast fastest around?

>>60664947
> Are the single core processing speeds atleast fastest around?
No, 16/32 Threadripper will have higher clocks thus higher singlethreaded perf.

>>60664754
>Board partners validated their boards for ECC.
That's good, but not what I asked about.
Is there any information on a Threadripper motherboard that has ECC support beyond "validation"?
>>60664761
Features that are never implemented don't matter. If boards can't implement ECC here, nobody cares that the CPU or chipset can support it.

File: 109.gif (3MB, 200x200px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 200x200px

>>60664409

I care about actual performance, not just numbers. Who's the /v/irgin again?

>>60664418

Meaningless. Performs worse in real life.

>>60664435

If only it could do that in ALL games not just one. A shitty one in particular.

>>60664447

Yeah but the thing with Intel is you can anticipate it to be good 1 year in advance and unlike AMD it WILL be good.

>>60664955
>Is there any information on a Threadripper motherboard that has ECC support beyond "validation"?
Gigabyte lists ECC DIMMs support as one of the board features.

File: Gigabyte-X399-AORUS-Gaming-7-AMD-Ryzen-Threadripper-Motherboard_8.jpg (82KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 800x534px

>>60664966
So it does.
That's fantastic. No reason why ECC can't come into the desktop market. And for home servers and NAS it's long overdue.

>>60665002
>64 lanes
OH GOD YES FUCK YES I WANT TO PUT MY DICK IN IT.

>>60660011
Why? I also have a 6700k and is exactly what I needed. I'm not upgrading because these company's say 4 cores is dead.
Only thing that's ever pushed it is rendering, packaging/compiling

>>60664756
Well done.

File: 1491910851789.png (234KB, 882x758px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 882x758px

>>60664960
Nice try you anally cratered shekelchaser :^)

>>60665250

No I think you're the one trying here.

>>60664960
Might I consider that you kill yourself, tripfag?

File: lisa_su_smug.png (123KB, 240x286px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 240x286px

>>60665267

>>60665370

I'm not the one on SUICIDE WATCH

File: 1494767421045.jpg (43KB, 630x630px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 630x630px

>>60665512
:^)

>>60662273
Nice new meme

>>60662197
Can you elaborate?

File: me.png (14KB, 232x265px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 232x265px

>>60662926
I did
and

its alright

>>60659971
What a joke.
I hope none of you buy into this scam.