Stop using Firefox

GR#6 : The quality of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-quality images and informative comments.

Thank you for your post, Pajeet. 5 Rupees have been deposited into your account. You may withdraw money once you have a balance of 1,000,000 Rupees so please carry on writing more quality posts like this one.

FF57 is looking good though.

>>60647892
lol

>You will anyway, once FF 57 hits
Why would I?

>>60648023
because they remove every half useful extension and leave only the shitty ones

Recently changed to waterfox and brave. Fuck Firecucks

https://people-mozilla.org/~shorlander/projects/photon/Mockups/linux.html

i like it, fuck off google shill

>>60647813
>implying they won't take it back when they see they lost 90% of the market share they had
>implying there won't be tons of FF56 forks

>>60647813
>gorhill porting over all extensions
Why would FF 57 change anything? uMatric and uBlock are literally the only extensions you need. And this is a technology board, and as such there is no alternative to Firefox/its derivatives unless you're a shill or a spewing Windblows user.

>>60648233
whats the difference between it and FF, now that FF i 64bit is 64bit, as well

>>60648216
All my extensions have chrome versions, so it wouldn't be hard to port them. The only thing I would miss is tree style tabs.

>vimperator will be kill in november
fuck. is de-googled chromium a meme?

I already switched to Pale Moon

>stop using firefox now
>because in the future you're going to lose firefox specific addons
...
>Lose firefox addons now because you'll lose them in the future
That is 100%, grade-A fucking retarded logic. I'll just not update until the shit that I use is supported.

>>60648655
>That is 100%, grade-A fucking retarded logic.
No, it's not.

>>60648216
>>60647813
See pic rel. Which of these will break with FF57?

File: addons.png (60KB, 1042x658px)

60KB, 1042x658px

>>60648216
>>60647813
>>60648749
My retarded ass forgot pic

I'm still using Firefox 43, should I upgrade to 56? I'm not going to 57 because I use a bunch of old addons.

>>60648788
enjoy your security holes

>>60648655
I have absolutely no idea what you're trying to say here.

>>60648788
Switch to Pale Moon, or at the very least, Firefox ESR

60648856
I don't give meaningful replies to namefags

File: fennec.jpg (20KB, 458x283px)

20KB, 458x283px

Is fennec kill? They have not released nothing futher than 53

Am I safe if I use nightly?

>>60648856
Thanks, I'll check them out.

>>60648291
>not blocking javascript

File: 01412934.jpg (46KB, 350x280px)

46KB, 350x280px

>>60648766
>plebbit
>youtube2mp3

>>60647853
>5 Rupees
Overpaid. This will be reported to the Google HQ

would firefox 57 at least be as fast as chrome?

>tfw every browser but firefox is garbage, firefox will be garbage soon, and palemoon doesn't support any of my addons/extensions

Maybe people will port their shit over to palemoon when update 57 hits.

File: Screenshot.png (110KB, 1280x1024px)

110KB, 1280x1024px

>>60647813
>2017
>Not using Lynx as main browser except for sites like 4chan due to captcha
>BAKA

File: addons.png (28KB, 574x442px)

28KB, 574x442px

r8 my addons brehs

>>60648966
uMatric can block all scripts, no? It defaults to allow first party. And you can't post on 4chan without javascript

>>60649232
>downloading youtube as MP4

I don't understand man

>>60649232
>no uMatrix
>letting tracking scripts, cookies, frames to pillage your browser

File: stupid bitch.jpg (334KB, 1280x804px)

334KB, 1280x804px

>>60647813
What would I use instead? It's not like I'd be able to move to Pale Moon since they fucked up and pretty much all the addons I want are broken now which would put me in a similar situation to Firefox after killing old addons, and meme tier browsers like Qutebrowser offer less features than Pale Moon with the few addons that it still supports while using more resources.

>tumbling down tumbling down tumbling down

>>60649275
Not him but is having noscript over umatrix ok

>>60649275
uBlock does all of that anon...

File: umatrix.png (28KB, 527x389px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 527x389px

>>60649262
>And you can't post on 4chan without javascript
You can, and yes, I know I'm an enormous faggot for allowing images and CSS by default instead of going full autism mode and blacklisting everything by default.

Why are they killing their extensions?

>>60649269
there are some good classical music pieces on youtube that are hard to find anywhere else (for free). If there was a youtube to flac I knew about I'd use that.

File: 1484379314350.jpg (50KB, 342x342px)

50KB, 342x342px

>>60649388
>this is how casual /g/ has become

>>60649415
It's quick and dirty and that's all I care for.

What are add-ons installed by normies that are a waste of time?

HOW AM I GOING TO SURVIVE WITHOUT VIMPERATOR??
HOLD ME /g/

60649447
ironic shitposting is still shitposting

>>60649275
at the expense of being called a turbo casual the only sites I go to outside of private browsing is 4chinz, exhentai, and youtube. Pretty much everything else is done in private browsing

File: 1454489251027.gif (2MB, 500x371px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x371px

>he doesnt have decentraleyes installed
>he doesnt have privacy badger installed

>>60648233
does brave have treestyletabs?

File: 2ed5fb9d554644b4989c6691dc35d5d8.jpg (317KB, 640x643px)

317KB, 640x643px

I already switched over to Chrome.

>>60647813
Waterfox will maintain compatibility with normal add ons
Stop being a cuck

>>60649360
because they think making their browser more like chrome to the point that it runs the same extensions as chrome, that they'll get more marketshare.

File: firecuck.png (53KB, 584x221px)

53KB, 584x221px

>>60647813
I've got a couple more updates until I have to jump ship to waterfox or palemoon

>>60649343
How? Captcha won't load for me. Don't tell me you have a pass?

File: 164897987.jpg (105KB, 500x423px)

105KB, 500x423px

>>60648800
>enjoy your security holes
LOL
this has got to be the BIGGEST SCAM of the century, fuck off you shill

>>60649343
but how can I rice 4chan if I block everything????

>>60649477
>botnet badger
ishygddt

>>60649530
You dont trust the EFF?

>>60649343
legacy captcha does not load you ruseman

>>60649540
theres something shady about privacy badger so i dont use it

>>60649562
what's shady about it?

File: captcha.png (144KB, 299x452px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 299x452px

>>60649509
No, I'm not stupid

>>60649526
4chan X

>>60649545
Who needs legacy captcha when you have the least botnet captcha of them all: non-javascript captcha

>>60649581
Posting windows don't open without scripts. You're full of shit

>>60649499
>using an adware infested browser
>calling others "cuck"

>>60647813
I'm on pale moon senpai.

>>60649581
Or just stop being poor and get a pass.
1.60 a month for not having to deal with this stupid shit.
I mean honestly, how many hours daily do you spend here?

>using pale moon and waterfox
>not paying attention to your online fingerprint

gj

>>60649660
elaborate

>>60649581
>getting an extension to replace a built in extension that you blocked because of your autism
no thanks.

>>60649656
>05/29/17(Mon)15:11:02 No.60649540
Why don't you have a pass?

File: neo-chanology.jpg (509KB, 1242x1480px)

509KB, 1242x1480px

>>60649656
>seriously giving Hiroyuki money after he stood by and allowed neo-chanology cancer to bring in fuck tons of redditors and run 4chan into the ground

>>60649721
I do.

>>60649677
>using obscure browser with unpopular addons
>exponentially lessens the chance that anyone else out there is using the same setup
>your browser fingerprint is now much easier to uniquely identify you with, easier to view and track browsing habits

You hide behind a VPN for "privacy", yet then youll be braindead and use a unique browser that can be tracked independently of your IP address.
If you give a fuck about your privacy, you dont use em

>>60649755
>thinking I don't spoof my user agent
wew

File: 1495296095521.jpg (219KB, 1024x827px)

219KB, 1024x827px

>>60649741
as long as the cancerous plebbitors stick to /pol/ and generate ad revenue gookmoot won't do a damn thing

>>60649741
I don't browser /v/eddit and /pol/eddit, why should it concern me?

>>60649768
>he doesnt understand that the user agent is a small portion of his browser fingerprint

Jesus christ /g/

>>60649788
>spoof user agent to some normie browser
>don't install botnet plugins like flash
>not let random scripts read my shit
what's the problem lad

>>60649755
>>using obscure browser with unpopular addons
>>exponentially lessens the chance that anyone else out there is using the same setup
And how can the site you're going to identify anything from those addons if you don't have javascript enabled?

>inb4 but javascript is required for most sites
Fingerprint with javascript enabled has advanced to the point where you would need standard hardware in addition to the same browser, browser configuration, and OS as a significant amount of people in order to not be uniquely identified.

>>60649788
Fingerprinting seems like the least invasive and easy technique to implement for firms interesting in tracking/ advertisements, but I know very little about it.

Is there anything a user can do to prevent clear fingerprinting aside from middle bell curve browser set-ups?

>>60649818
If you want to discuss this in depth then make a thread about it. There's too much information on the subject to summarize within a couple posts.

>>60649360
Because the old addon model is a maintenance nightmare and it's getting in the way of fixing the internals of firefox. If they tried to keep the addons working they'd probably just break at various points in the future and piss everyone off, instead they've decided to cut to the chase and just do one breakage and give everyone the heads up well ahead of time so they can work on porting their addons to the new addon framework.

>>60649231

if you use links2 in graphics mode you can still post.

>>60649447
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/vimium-ff/

>>60649847
>/g/ thread seeking advice from fingerprinting-knowledgeable firefox users
Yeah nah. I'll just research it on my own.

>>60649847
>Because the old addon model is a maintenance nightmare
yes, and?

>>60647813
sup with 57? I guess I'm safe with my 52.1 till then (year?).

>>60648453
I use vimium in chrome, it works well enough for me.

File: read his shirt.png (522KB, 662x960px)

522KB, 662x960px

>>60648766
>download extension
>https meme
>anti cookies
>youtube mp3

Not even talking about plebbit. I guess I got finally trolled on 4chan.

>>60650041
vimium is adequate for basic browsing, but vimperator went a lot further and added a lot more commands and customization options.

I'd probably check out cVim or vrome before vimium, but that's just my preference.

>>60649849
Thanks, I've forgotten hat one exists

>>60650061
Of all the things you could complain about ton that list, you pick 3 addons that are totally reasonable to have.

>>60648766
>>60650061
I have youtube-dl and use it, that was quicker when I was making a shitty quality cd for some ball breaker.

>"Oh you're good with computers? Can you make me a cd?"
It's a family friend so I had to

The other extensions are useful

File: yeah.jpg (142KB, 1295x948px)

142KB, 1295x948px

Get on my level.

So, how much of this shit will stop working on 57? Although I'm using FF just for tests.

>>60650166
quickjava looks pretty interesting

>>60650166
Pretty much all of that. Gorhill will port ublock origin over before 57 so that will remain. Adblock plus is dead and the devs are going to port the chromium version before 57. The rest are probably dead.

File: kys.png (12KB, 246x200px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 246x200px

>>60650135
Well, I see he picked https and cooks. So you think that at least one of them is reasonable to use.

>>60650224
What's wrong with downthemall?

File: kekfrog.gif (778KB, 153x165px)

778KB, 153x165px

>>60649232
>4chan Media Downloader
that's some tricky extension you got there

>>60650166
>Adblock plus
Has bugs blocking it
>Anti-aliasing tuner
Dead
>Classic theme restorer
Dead
>Distill web monitor
Dead, but there's a chrome version, so it's likely it may be ported back.
>Element hiding helper
Don't know. Maybe dead.
>FireFTP
Dead
>FlashGot
Dead
>friGate
Don't know.
>HistoryBlock
Dead
>Noscript
Has bugs blocking it
>QuickJava
Dead
>Speed dial
Dead
>Tab mix plus
Dead
>Ublock origin
Has bugs blocking it
>Video adblock
Don't know.

>>60649777
>wahhh impressionable retards aren't voting democrat, it's all RUINED
They could vote for the right party because they believe aliens told them to for all I care. Reasons do not matter, the result is the same.

>>60650380
makes downloading threads on /e/ and /s/ easier but it just dumps the images into the download folder. at least it works

>>60650423
>QuickJava
>Dead
Damn that's sad.

>>60650491
Note that when I say dead, for some of those it just means the extension is yet to be rewritten for webextensions. It could be that the extension is perfectly compatible and a new version is to be released soon, depending on whether the developer wants to deal with that shit or not.

>>60649579
>its not open source
>they didnt want to release it on firefox mobile
>they wanted to release a fork of firefox or chrome with privacy badger embedded
>you couldn't modify it

Other things i dont remember anymore

>>60649777
Why does /pol/ deserve to suffer the mass immigration of foreigners?

>>60650589
The functionality in quickjava exists in firefox in the preferences it just doesn't have a way to easily flip the switches from the toolbar. I'm sure making an equivalent would be very easy if Mozilla exposed those options through the APIs

>>60650606
>its not open source
>you couldn't modify it
It's licensed under the GPL you double nigger.

>>60650633
Another alternative is using a blocker extension like umatrix to block the content you do not want. It's actually a better alternative than globally allowing or denying content

>>60650624
because when /pol/ is disturbed they sperg out and shit up other boards

>>60650653
But they didnt want to release privacy badger on firefox mobile so they could release their own firefox/chrome fork with privacy badger embedded in it

>tfw you realize the eff wanted to release the brave browser before the brave browser

>>60647813
i plan on staying on nightly v54 for quite some time (probably till 2019)
come at me!

>>60650794
Hopefully palememe gets the attention firefox once had and be at the top like firefox once was

>>60650166
>>60648766
my firefox got unbearable laggy after just adding a few extensions, can't imagine having this many

>>60648766
Are there any good alternatives to down them all? I use it nearly daily and if the update to 57 breaks it I'll be out of luck, as far as I know

>>60651770
As far as I'm aware of nope. Downthemall will die when XUL is dropped since the Dev can't port it.

>>60647813
I use GNUzilla IceCat.

>>60651782
Damn. Looks like I'll be switching to one of the open forks.

>>60649343
How? I got the captcha to load but when I solve it and try to post it says the captcha malfuntioned or I failed. I'm using 4chanx.

>>60647813
I will use Firefox 56 for the rest of my life.

File: tired2.jpg (57KB, 482x549px)

57KB, 482x549px

But my tree-style tabs...

>chrome is botnet
>chromium is botnet as well
>firefox is neutering itself
>vivaldi is dead lmao
>opera is chink botnet
>explorer is shit and botnet
>edge is shit, botnet, and has no extensions
what broswer is a man supposed to shitpost with now?

>>60647813
I already have, I dropped Firefox around the time the retarded version numbering started.

>>60653766
Darth-Vader Web-Browser v0.5.3 hybrid FINAL

>>60649755
I've honestly never understood why so much information is exposed to any website I visit. I get sending the browser type because we live in a cucked world where sites still have to deliver content based on the renderer, but why the fuck are my extensions exposed? Plug ins are a bit more understandable, but why not just have the website deliver the data and let your browser tell you you don't have the right plug in.

>>60653777
I can't shitpost with a TIE fighter

>>60649755
I mean you're right, but the common normiefag browser setups are objectively bad and give up your privacy wholesale in different ways.

>>60648788
upgrade to at least 47, past that they added the gay forced extension signing

>>60654000
Is it the browser that's purposefully doing this or just the sites?

File: 1315303241785.png (67KB, 563x818px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 563x818px

>>60650932

Firefox has been running slow for me lately. I've been trying Chromium portable and it's pretty fast at least compared to Firefox. It sucks but I don't even have a lot of addons.

>>60651804
>IceCat
Great, let me just download that for wind- oh wait it's irrelevant shit you have to compile yourself every time there's a fucking update

Also probably tries to block non-stallman approved extensions, meaning it has the same issue as FF57

>>60654082
>>60650932
>people are still lying about firefox being slow in 2017

>>60653770
And you switched to chome, yeah?

>>60649158
The folks at palemoon are supposedly working on a new browser.
Using Vivaldi myself. May not suit your firefox needs, but for me it's leagues ahead of chrome and the other competition

File: jdimsa.png (24KB, 462x140px)

24KB, 462x140px

>>60654124

depends on your browsing habits

>>60650932
you're either a poorfag or a liar tbqh, i've got a 6 year old computer with 28 firefox tabs open and 11 extensions, one of which is greasemonkey (with 5 scripts) and it runs great

>>60654448

>mfw plebs use chrome

fermi.bat

>>60654032
Both, the default configs are anti-privacy but there are configuration options hidden away.

>>60649279
Are this "bitch" a man? I mean, those knees... And nose.
Anyway, post more please.

>>60649415
>being so """special"""

>>60654026
I am going to attempt to update to ESR 52. Apparently ESR still lets you use unsigned addons.

>>60649755
>>60649768
>>60649660
>never having sex

>step away from computer for an hour
>lock it
>Firefox starts using 30% more memory and starts shitting out after I come back
what is this

>>60648553
tried it, too far off for me my guy
try waterfox

>>60647813
fuck off google shill

>>60649279
Out of curiosity, what features are you missing in qutebrowser?

Just use Vivaldi

>>60654140
To Chrome when it came out, used it for a few months and switched to Opera.

>>60647813
i actually can't wait for 57 it looks great

>>60649388
>shitty m4a to flac
lol

>>60649620
he's not you're just an idiot

am i the only one using firefox because it's the only major free browser that's configurable and doesn't download hidden blobs post installation and not because of addons, are you niggers really 12

>>60655643
what does being 12 and addons have in common?
>not using tracking blocking addons
p leb

File: 1423356092861.png (111KB, 300x333px)

111KB, 300x333px

>ctrl-f
>seamonkey
>0 results

What's a browser that will still support current firefox addons?

>>60649482
>>60648318
>>60649482
>2000+17
>treestyletabs
>not using Tab Tree
wtf neo /g/

File: NP0OtE.png (7KB, 1207x264px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 1207x264px

>>60648749
>>60648766

>>60648317
There really isn't one anymore. Waterfox is just a meme now

>>60656502
Ublock origin has a webextension verson though

>>60647813
FF 57 is actually when I move _to_ Firefox, as it will become faster, and to escape the Google botnet.

File: 1494833181309.png (12KB, 420x420px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 420x420px

Every time there is this thread I always wonder if there are really going to be that many disabled extensions. Nobody seems to be able to name more than two addons than won't be ported. Still, the only rational option if you miss XUL addons that much is moving to Palemoon. Moving to Chromium is dumb as fuck in any case.

File: addons.png (28KB, 443x262px)

28KB, 443x262px

>>60649232
Private tab is one of the best addons.

Does anyone know a good css injector which works with 57+?

>>60656731
>Moving to Chromium is dumb as fuck in any case.

You'd be dumb as fuck NOT to move to chromium I think you mean.

What about truely ungoogled chrome - iridium browser? Am I the only one using it?

>>60656848
I use ungoogled-chromium too but I can understand people avoiding it since it's rarely updated and you lose a lot of addons and customizability that Firefox has

Should i update from internet explorer??

>>60648766
>faggot gene detected

I stopped when they fired that dude for supporting traditional marriage

File: 1494020192088.jpg (28KB, 600x600px)

28KB, 600x600px

>>60656817
>isn't faster than Firefox
>is a botnet
>UI is uncustomizable
>rapes your ram with three tabs open

But at least it makes you eligible for the title of best goy.

>>60656939
What the fuck are you, a conservative?

File: 452(2).png (598KB, 600x878px)

598KB, 600x878px

>>60651782
But how will I mass download smut with ease

>>60656971
it doesn't matter, they literally fired him for having an opinion, he just donated some money

File: mozilla-Human-Aid-Internet-For_Africa.jpg (414KB, 1415x1272px)

414KB, 1415x1272px

>>60649360
>Why are they killing their extensions?

Go to about:support in your current Firefox and see if you have "Multiprocess Windows" enabled or not.

Having quite a few extensions enabled will force it to be "disabled". Oddly this is mostly not because the extensions block it but because Firefox will just block any extension which somehow tells Firefox that it will work fine with this. Why, for example, will the Memory Restart plugin block it? There's no technical reason but the Mozilla corporation seems to think that just blocking everything that's not updated the last month is the way to go.

Perhaps they should stick with being a humanitarian aid organization like their homepage https://www.mozilla.org/ make it look like they are and let someone fork Firefox and make it a good browser again.

>>60656996
He stepped down voluntarily, the company didn't force him in any way and even asked him to stay. Stop lying, Pajeet.

>>60657026
>An organized campaign to demonize him and his entire company because of a personal choice he made outside of work
>voluntary

The job lynch mob is cancer

>>60657066
Sounds like he was an asshole who deserved it. Justice was done.

>>60657026
>plz quit or we fire you ;) but hey it's your call!

>>60657075
>Oh no he holds an opinion I don't like, lets take away his livelihood because we can't just go out and execute dissenters anymore.

>>60657006
>let someone fork Firefox
are you retarded or something? you CAN fork FF,
fork it yourself and fuck off

>>60657092
Fuck that, it was his choice to have fucked up opinions and he took the consequences.

>>60657128
Yeah, thoughtcrime is serious shit, doesn't matter if it's only relegated to his private life, he should lose all means of supporting himself until we're legally allowed to drag animals like him behind our cars.

>>60657151
Next time he'll get in line and take some responsibility and not be a cunt.

>>60657066
The lynch mob was organized by Google and their pajeets, it wasn't internal to Mozilla.

>>60656646
>>>60647813(OP)
>FF 57 is actually when I move _to_ Firefox, as it will become faster, and to escape the Google botnet.

There is nothing new in FF 57 related to speed that isn't already there in the current versions. The only change is that now the new rendering system is disabled if you have legacy extensions. If you don't have any extensions then there's no change. As of FF 57 it just force disables legacy ones and everyone gets the "Quantum Compositor engine".

There is, however, the issue of the new user interface
https://www.neowin.net/news/mozilla-is-working-on-a-new-ui-for-firefox-57
which will clearly be another huge step backwards.

I guess Mozilla really wants to push all their users away from Firefox so they can focus on being a humanitarian aid organization. Their website is already re-designed for their new purpose.

>>60657202
Doesn't matter, it's a farce to call his resignation voluntary when there's that amount of pressure and vitriol against him and his company. Regardless of weather that effort is grassroots, manufactured or any mix of the two.

>>60647813
Nah. I'll stop using firefox when qutebrowser gets an umatrix equivalent. Until then I'll stay on ff 45 + pentadactyl.

>>60655839
it has a lot to do as according to many posts here that's firefox's only worth
>tracking blocking addons
such as?

>>60656817
you're doing it wrong pajet

>>60657237
that tiny bit of clarification does matter if true

>>60656646
How are they escaping the botnet in that release?

>>60656460
what the hell is this shit, you cant even collapse a tree. if you cant theres no point in a tree because your shit clutters up anyways.
kys

>>60649388
>coverting a lossy format to lossless
bless your heart

>>60657244
FWIW the functionality of blocking request types per-domain (without an uMatrix-like UI yet, though) should come in a few weeks to months:

https://github.com/qutebrowser/qutebrowser/issues/2626

>>60654986
How is it too far off? Looks just like an older version of Firefox. Works with the old extensions, you can theme it FTDeepDark just use this too:

https://userstyles.org/styles/135791/pale-moon-27-address-status-bar-fix

>>60657006
>what is palememe

Hey /g/, i am /pol/.
>it's da JOOs
am i right?

>>60654113
You can get it precompiled from the trisquel and parabola repos.
Also just a side note, you probably shouldn't be using windows. Its a massive surveillance engine similar to that described in nineteen eighty four

>>60658383
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8FYYCI8MW8

>>60656502
Are you memeing me?

>>60657230
Photon is better than Australis imo.

>>60649388
Nigga just lurk /mu/ for a week holy fuck

>>60648317
Cooler logo. Still furshit but not as obvious.

>>60650932
Git gud hardware

>>60649432
you're better off downloading it in 192kb/s mp3, there is no point in downloading past that point.

>>60648855
He's asking why the fuck he would lose his extensions now instead of losing them some time in the future you illiterate fucktard.

https://www.ghacks.net/2016/08/14/override-firefox-add-on-signing-requirement/

You're welcome. Enjoy the complete customizability of Firefox while it lasts and tell the motherfuckers who think extension signing is required to fuck off

>>60648453
Cyberfox is dying this year too.

Feels bad, bros.

>>60659091
This doesn't do anything about XUL

>>60656805
It really is a fantastic extension
>>60658921
I tried getting everything from /classical/ but they're on mega meaning it won't download anything larger than 2GB without their shittier extension which when enabled prevents mega from loading for me.

>>60659286
Use mega downloader, bro

>>60648216
>>60648256
>>60648788
>>60648888
>>60648995
>>60649360
>>60649508
>>60649980
>>60649898
>>60650061
>>60650446
>>60650624
>>60656939
>>60657230
>>60657244
>>60659091
>every half useful extension
>using old as fuck releases
>not understanding firefox release cadence
>not even knowing what uMatrix does
>killing extensions
>recommending vimium for replacing vimperator even when vimfx misses many vimperator features but still manages to be better
>https is a meme
>/pol/acks who think everything is to do with politics
>mozilla will become a humanitarian aid organisation (this one defies logic even further)
>still defending unsigned extensions
every fucking time firefox is brought up on this board the spergs come out of the wood work. can't fucking believe these are the people i share a board with.
>waah waah why dont mozilla act like a megacorp
for exactly the same reasons they don't engage in explicit botnettery like google or microsoft. as a non profit its in their mission to fight for the health, independence and freedom of the web and its users. i'm not going to defend brendan kike or those who campaigned to have him sacked either. but eich was still spooked.
there is literally ONE extension that is actually useful that doesn't have a WebExtension equivalent and that's self-destructing cookies, and that's a good candidate for mainlining anyway. everything else is either shit, useless, or out of date and unmaintained.

>>60650423
>Classic theme restorer - Dead
>Noscript - Has bugs blocking it
>Ublock origin - Has bugs blocking it

Seriously? Fuck, those three are all i actually care about

File: 1335125795575.jpg (25KB, 202x164px)

25KB, 202x164px

>>60659551

>>60659674
noscript is crap and its author is a shady bastard. use umatrix instead.
gorhill has over a month to get ublock ready for webextensions

File: file.png (29KB, 742x647px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 742x647px

T-thanks!

>>60659801
>uBlock
>Legacy

Isn't it already aviable on Chrome?

>>60659940
The version on AMO still uses the original APIs. The webextensions version hasn't been brought over to AMO yet. When it comes over people on the legacy version should be converted to the webextensions version automatically.

is there a quick way to see which of my extensions are fucked?

multiprocess has an addon that checks compatibility

File: asdasdasda.png (77KB, 1434x789px)

77KB, 1434x789px

I'm going to miss Self Destructing Cookies

Longtime Firefox and clone user here.

Is Iridium still the best option for not avoiding the Gbotnet?

>>60660101
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/cookie-autodelete/

>>60660178
Wow, thanks.

>>60660050
Nightly marks extensions that are incompatible with 57 as "Legacy" >>60659801

Mozilla is probably going to bring this to the stable versions at some point

you faggot niggers need to use text browsers now fuck off and suck my cock you fucking niggers nigger.

>>60650932
fix your firefox. i use it on hardware from 2003 and it works the same as on modern hardware.

>>60659551
>every fucking time firefox is brought up on this board the spergs come out of the wood work.
have you visited firefox.com recently?

>>60660529
yes i have, what of it?

nobody has answeredif fennec on fdroid is getting dropped. Is still on 53

>>60648453
I would use it but I can't deal with chrome interface. If only they made an unbotneted vivaldi, but that shit is not even open sourced.

>>60649298
ublock isn't as thorough as umatrix.

Jokes on you, I am using Debian Jessie with Firefox ESR 45.9.0. Works without problems.

>>60658097
well, it doesn't handle muh flash vidya. It can't handle the font contrast fix extension etc. I still like it but my tiny laptop didn't enjoy compiling it

>>60649508
I'll use 52 ESR for a while, after this I'll use palemoon because I need a gtk2 browser (thumbnail view patches).

>>60664373
>muh flash vidya

who even cares

any website worth a fuck abandoned flash, what are you reading? Clickbait websites?

>>60653766
firefox 52 esr

>>60664655
comdotgame my guy, I need to fap as well.

I stopped using it the day faggots forced the creator of javascript out of the company.

>>60647813
bump 4 palemoon.

I'm still on FF 42, what do?

>>60649388
>Converting 480p default quality to a lossless flac
>Downloading 10 times the file size with no benefit
And then there's this retard

>>60659785
Isn't it way more than one month? I thought Firefox 57 was the version where support for non-webextensions would be dropped? That's almost half a year from now.

>>60665597
Yep

>>60658767
wat do u meme?

>>60659551
Are you retarded or just completely unaware of the numerous add-ons firefox currently offers?

>>60654124
Mine crashes constantly. I don't have many extensions but I open a lot of tabs. The program has its gay limits even with 32GB of RAM and a top of the line CPU.

>>60649388
Just use Complete Youtube Saver which can directly download just the audio stream without needing to download the entire video nor do any sort of conversion.

File size is smaller, download times are quicker, and quality will be better.

For reference, there are three audio formats on YouTube - Opus, OGG vorbis, and AAC/M4A

Opus = highest quality, lowest compatibility

OGG vorbis = medium quality, medium compatibility

AAC/M4A = lowest quality, highest compatibility

Also note that 720p and higher has higher audio bitrate than 480p and lower.

>>60648318
Tree style tabs works in ff57

>>60647813
nah

>>60665921
fuckin nice. thanks

>>60650166
>two ad blockers
>russian
Checks out.

File: 1494612587988.png (1MB, 576x576px)

1MB, 576x576px

>>60648216

No they don't. They just migrate to an extension standard that works in all browsers and not just in firefox. In the end this should mean that extension developers only have to write one extension to support all browsers. That's actually good for Firefox or am I missing something?

https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2017/02/16/the-road-to-firefox-57-compatibility-milestones/

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Add-ons/WebExtensions

File: 1463063467578.webm (841KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

841KB, 1280x720px

>>60665921
>can download subs with video

Perfect

>>60648766
>fireshot
>not shift+f2
>screenshot --fullpage

It's like you have brain damage

File: 2017-04-11-154831_903x713_scrot.png (182KB, 903x713px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 903x713px

>>60653766
Seamonkey

>>60667539
fuck that. I'm installing ie4.
DHTML > HTML5+Canvas anyway.

>>60664745
So, lord beawesome, what browser do you use?

>>60667676
im using internet explorer, the superior browser