Docker

>>60635682
yes

you can EASILY build a career with docker.

it's the software equivalent of a VM

>>60635743
>it's the software equivalent of a VM

VMs are software too, pajeet

Just loaded docker on my xponology, what's the hottest docker you advice?

>>60635682
Learn it. Every job interview ive done in the past year has asked if I know it. Its simple once you get your head around it.

It's a meme and will be gone in a year or two imo.

>>60635682
the only thing I've used docker for was to install paintschainer to autocolor hentai lineart locally/offline

as an idea, it's okay -- bam, everything is preconfigured in a vm and will basically work the same anywhere
fuck-huge overhead though

>>60635682
It's a per application sandbox with vm-like behavior?

>>60636648

Pretty much, it was written with Linux in mind to use namespaces and control groups in the kernel to be able to achieve sandbox/VM behavior so you can run other distributions applications. While intended as a sandbox per application originally, people realized that because containers use the host computer's Linux kernel and because it segregates itself very well, it could be for most applications a lower overhead VM. This means that if you aren't doing anything that involves the kernel, then you can throw out your VM and use Docker instead. If using anything like systemd init stuff or drivers, then you should keep using a VM.

For other platforms, Docker uses lightweight hypervisors on Windows and Macs to achieve the same thing as above.

>>60636821
Thank you. Seems a bit limited in use, but from a security and deployment perspective it seems pretty valuable.

>>60637498
It's worthless for security. Docker containers never were and never will be intended to be secure.

>>60635743
>software equivalent
what do you think virtual means?

>>60637614
dirty cow will completely destroy the system that u run docker on

>>60638618
dirty cow is patched (but that doesn't mean there isn't any other exploits that we dont know about)