What are differencies between Antegros and Arch?

Arch is best, Ant-negro is ugly, less efficient, and someone's little project.

Easier install + extra repo

>>60559500
Nice purse, sissy

>>60559582
I guess you made point for arch, don't you?

>>60559628
What does 'made point ' mean

File: dbunkd.jpg (27KB, 800x449px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 800x449px

>>60559500
antergos is based on arch
so
antergos == arch + packages

more accurate:
arch is basiclly a kernel + gnu tools

more down to n00bs:
arch is a linux cli, you only get a command line as OS, like a awesome brand new blank white paper and pencil, world is yours

antergos is a GUI OS based on someone builds on arch as a base

but about what you ask, antergos vs arch, antergos is a """final"" user ready" arch

eventually every rolling release distro is going to "break", aka package x is not yet compatible with y lib or package it used to
but that is just part of the fun

>>60559638
Like, made point, arch has easier install+extra repo

>>60559666
No. Antergos has
I don undastand

>>60559666
....???? what????
as >>60559647 says, antegros is just arch with packages

>>60559729
Dude, you're too retarded to even understand basic english grammar.
Don't get arch stay on debian or ubuntu

>>60559500
Both of them are for amateur schoolkids and never used in production.

>>60559500
>All black meme

>>60559940
>Don't get arch stay on debian or ubuntu
That's what I'm going to do. Using Arch is a silly idea unless you're using Linux just for fun.

>>60559500
Antergos doesn't make you look cool in screenfetch threads.

>>60560061
Anetgros is /fa/ as fuck.

>>60559940
I'm currently using lubuntub and was thinking about switching, antegros seems like pretty good choice, just because /g/ is shilling pure arch.

>>60560407
Because the majority of /g/ are unexperienced schoolkids who can't use Gentoo and install Arch as a half-measure to show their ability to use CLI without automated tools.

>>60559500
cute girl (male)

also checked